• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤知情伦理咨询

Trauma Informed Ethics Consultation.

作者信息

Lanphier Elizabeth, Anani Uchenna E

机构信息

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.

University of Cincinnati College of Medicine.

出版信息

Am J Bioeth. 2022 May;22(5):45-57. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1887963. Epub 2021 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1080/15265161.2021.1887963
PMID:33684027
Abstract

We argue for the addition of trauma informed awareness, training, and skill in clinical ethics consultation by proposing a novel framework for Trauma Informed Ethics Consultation (TIEC). This approach expands on the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities (ASBH) framework for, and key insights from feminist approaches to, ethics consultation, and the literature on trauma informed care (TIC). TIEC keeps ethics consultation in line with the provision of TIC in other clinical settings. Most crucially, TIEC (like TIC) is systematically sensitive to culture, history, difference, power, social exclusion, oppression, and marginalization. By engaging a neonatal intensive care ethics consult example, we define our TIEC approach and illustrate its application. Through TIEC we argue it is the role of ethics consultants to not only hold open moral spaces, but to furnish them in morally habitable ways for all stakeholders involved in the ethics consultation process, including patients, surrogates, and practitioners.

摘要

我们通过提出一种创伤知情伦理咨询(TIEC)的新颖框架,主张在临床伦理咨询中增加创伤知情意识、培训和技能。这种方法扩展了美国生物伦理与人文学会(ASBH)的伦理咨询框架、女性主义伦理咨询方法的关键见解以及创伤知情护理(TIC)的相关文献。TIEC使伦理咨询与其他临床环境中TIC的提供保持一致。最关键的是,TIEC(与TIC一样)对文化、历史、差异、权力、社会排斥、压迫和边缘化具有系统性的敏感性。通过一个新生儿重症监护伦理咨询的例子,我们定义了我们的TIEC方法并说明其应用。通过TIEC,我们认为伦理咨询师的作用不仅是保持开放的道德空间,而且要以道德上适宜居住的方式为参与伦理咨询过程的所有利益相关者提供这些空间,包括患者、代理人和从业者。

相似文献

1
Trauma Informed Ethics Consultation.创伤知情伦理咨询
Am J Bioeth. 2022 May;22(5):45-57. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1887963. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
2
Burying the basilisk of bioethics: What can be resolved, dissolved, and refocused in the ethics expertise debate.埋葬生物伦理学的巨蟒:在伦理学专业知识的争论中,什么是可以解决、消解和重新聚焦的。
Bioethics. 2023 Jul;37(6):515-522. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13044. Epub 2022 May 16.
3
Negotiating the moral order: paradoxes of ethics consultation.协商道德秩序:伦理咨询的悖论
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1995 Jun;5(2):89-112. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0066.
4
Core competencies for health care ethics consultants: in search of professional status in a post-modern world.医疗保健伦理顾问的核心能力:在后现代世界中寻求专业地位。
HEC Forum. 2011 Sep;23(3):129-45. doi: 10.1007/s10730-011-9167-4.
5
Health care ethics consultation: nature, goals, and competencies. A position paper from the Society for Health and Human Values-Society for Bioethics Consultation Task Force on Standards for Bioethics Consultation.医疗保健伦理咨询:性质、目标与能力。健康与人类价值协会 - 生物伦理咨询协会生物伦理咨询标准特别工作组的立场文件。
Ann Intern Med. 2000 Jul 4;133(1):59-69. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-1-200007040-00012.
6
The ASBH Approach to Certify Clinical Ethics Consultants Is Both Premature and Inadequate.美国生物伦理与人文学会认证临床伦理顾问的方法既不成熟又不充分。
J Clin Ethics. 2019 Summer;30(2):109-116.
7
Political and interpersonal aspects of ethics consultation.伦理咨询的政治与人际因素
Theor Med. 1992 Mar;13(1):31-44. doi: 10.1007/BF00489218.
8
Competencies and Milestones for Bioethics Trainees: Beyond ASBH's Healthcare Ethics Certification and Core Competencies.生物伦理学培训生的能力和里程碑:超越 ASBH 的医疗保健伦理认证和核心能力。
J Clin Ethics. 2021 Summer;32(2):127-148.
9
Ethics consultation: the least dangerous profession?伦理咨询:最不危险的职业?
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1993 Fall;2(4):417-26; discussion 426-48. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100004473.
10
The Pitfalls of Proceduralism: An Exploration of the Goods Internal to the Practice of Clinical Ethics Consultation.程序主义的陷阱:临床伦理咨询实践中的内在善之探究
HEC Forum. 2018 Dec;30(4):389-403. doi: 10.1007/s10730-018-9359-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond the Question: Reexamining a Parent's Unusual Request.超越问题:重新审视父母的不寻常要求。
Pediatrics. 2024 Aug 1;154(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2023-064954.
2
Building trust: Leadership reflections on community empowerment and engagement in a large urban initiative.建立信任:领导力对大型城市倡议中社区赋权和参与的反思。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 28;23(1):1252. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15860-z.
3
Maximizing biomedical research impacts through bioethical considerations.通过生物伦理学考虑来最大化生物医学研究的影响。
Dis Model Mech. 2023 Apr 1;16(4). doi: 10.1242/dmm.050046. Epub 2023 Apr 24.