Satharasinghe D M, Jeyasugiththan J, Wanninayake W M N M B, Pallewatte A S
Department of Nuclear Science, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka. Horizon Campus, Malabe, Sri Lanka.
J Radiol Prot. 2021 Mar 8;41(1):R1-R27. doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/abd840.
This study aims to review the existing literature on diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in paediatric computed tomography (CT) procedures and the methodologies for establishing them. A comprehensive literature search was done in the popular databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar under the key words 'p(a)ediatric DRL', 'dose reference level', 'diagnostic reference level' and 'DRL'. Twenty-three articles originating from 15 countries were included. Differences were found in the methods used to establish paediatric CT DRLs across the world, including test subjects, reference phantom size, anatomical regions, modes of data collection and stratification techniques. The majority of the studies were based on retrospective patient surveys. The head, chest and abdomen were the common regions. The volume computed tomography dose index (CTDI) and dose-length product (DLP) were the dosimetric quantities chosen in the majority of publications. However, the size-specific dose estimate was a growing trend in the DRL concept of CT. A 16 cm diameter phantom was used by most of the publications when defining DRLs for head, chest and abdomen. The majority of the DRLs were given based on patient age, and the common age categories for head, chest and abdomen regions were 0-1, 1-5, 5-10 and 10-15 years. The DRL ranges for the head region were 18-68 mGy (CTDI) and 260-1608 mGy cm (DLP). For chest and abdomen regions the variations were 1.0-15.6 mGy, 10-496 mGy cm and 1.8-23 mGy, 65-807 mGy cm, respectively. All these DRLs were established for children aged 0-18 years. The wide range of DRL distributions in chest and abdomen regions can be attributed to the use of two different reference phantom sizes (16 and 32 cm), failure to follow a common methodology and inadequate dose optimisation actions. Therefore, an internationally accepted protocol should be followed when establishing DRLs. Moreover, these DRL variations suggest the importance of establish a national DRL for each country considering advanced techniques and dose reduction methodologies.
本研究旨在回顾有关儿科计算机断层扫描(CT)程序中诊断参考水平(DRLs)的现有文献以及确立这些水平的方法。在诸如PubMed和谷歌学术等知名数据库中,以“儿科DRL”、“剂量参考水平”、“诊断参考水平”和“DRL”为关键词进行了全面的文献检索。纳入了来自15个国家的23篇文章。发现世界各地用于确立儿科CT DRLs的方法存在差异,包括测试对象、参考体模尺寸、解剖区域、数据收集模式和分层技术。大多数研究基于回顾性患者调查。头部、胸部和腹部是常见区域。大多数出版物选择的剂量学量是容积计算机断层扫描剂量指数(CTDI)和剂量长度乘积(DLP)。然而,特定尺寸剂量估计在CT的DRL概念中呈增长趋势。大多数出版物在为头部、胸部和腹部定义DRL时使用直径16 cm的体模。大多数DRL是根据患者年龄给出的,头部、胸部和腹部区域常见的年龄类别为0 - 1岁、1 - 5岁、5 - 10岁和10 - 15岁。头部区域的DRL范围为18 - 68 mGy(CTDI)和260 - 1608 mGy cm(DLP)。胸部和腹部区域的变化分别为1.0 - 15.6 mGy、10 - 496 mGy cm和1.8 - 23 mGy、65 - 807 mGy cm。所有这些DRL都是为0 - 18岁的儿童确立的。胸部和腹部区域DRL分布范围广泛可归因于使用了两种不同的参考体模尺寸(16 cm和32 cm)、未遵循通用方法以及剂量优化措施不足。因此,确立DRL时应遵循国际公认的方案。此外,这些DRL差异表明,考虑到先进技术和剂量降低方法,为每个国家确立国家DRL很重要。