• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乌干达成人计算机断层扫描检查:确定国家诊断参考水平。

Adult Computed Tomography examinations in Uganda: Towards determining the National Diagnostic Reference Levels.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Clinical Epidemiology Unit, School of Medicine, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

出版信息

BMC Med Imaging. 2022 Jun 11;22(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12880-022-00838-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12880-022-00838-x
PMID:35690743
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9188687/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs), typically set at the 75th percentile of the dose distribution from surveys conducted across a broad user base using a specified dose-measurement protocol, are recommended for radiological examinations. There is a need to develop and implement DRLs as a standardisation and optimisation tool for the radiological protection of patients at Computed Tomography (CT) facilities.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted in seven (7) different CT scan facilities in which participants were recruited by systematic random sampling. The study variables were dose length product (DLP) and volume-weighted CTDI (CTDIvol) for the radiation doses for head, chest, abdomen and lumbar spine CT examinations. The DRLs for CTDIvol and DLP were obtained by calculating the 3rd quartiles of the radiation doses per study site by anatomical region. The national diagnostic reference levels were determined by computation of DRLs using the 75th centile of the median values.

RESULTS

A total of 574 patients were examined with an average age of 47.1 years. For CTDIvol estimates; there was a strong positive significant relationship between the CTDIvol and examination mAs (r = 0.9017, p-value < 0.001), and reference mAs (r = 0.0.7708, p-value < 0.001). For DLP estimates; there was a moderate positive significant relationships between DLP and total mAs (r = 0.6812, p-value < 0.001), reference mAs (r = 0.5493, p-value < 0.001). The DRLs were as follows; for head CT scan - the average median CTDIvol was 56.02 mGy and the DLP was 1260.3 mGy.cm; for Chest CT, the CTDI volume was 7.82 mGy and the DLP was 377.0 mGy.cm; for the abdomen CT, the CTDI volume 12.54 mGy and DLP 1418.3 mGy.cm and for the lumbar spine 19.48 mGy and the DLP was 843 mGy.cm, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed the need to optimize the CT scan parameters in order to lower the national DRLs. This can be achieved by extensive training of all the CT scan radiographers on optimizing the CT scan acquisition parameters. Continuous dose audits are also advised with new equipment or after every three years to ensure that values out of range are either justified or further investigated.

摘要

简介

诊断参考水平(DRL)通常设定为在使用特定剂量测量协议对广泛用户群进行的调查中剂量分布的第 75 百分位,建议将其用于放射学检查。需要制定和实施 DRL,作为 CT 设施中患者放射防护的标准化和优化工具。

方法

这是一项在七个不同 CT 扫描设施中进行的回顾性横断面研究,通过系统随机抽样招募参与者。研究变量为头部、胸部、腹部和腰椎 CT 检查的剂量长度乘积(DLP)和体积加权 CTDI(CTDIvol)。通过按解剖区域计算每个研究部位的辐射剂量的第 3 四分位数来获得 CTDIvol 和 DLP 的 DRL。通过计算中位数的 75 百分位来确定国家诊断参考水平。

结果

共有 574 名患者接受了检查,平均年龄为 47.1 岁。对于 CTDIvol 估计值;CTDIvol 与检查 mAs(r=0.9017,p 值<0.001)和参考 mAs(r=0.0.7708,p 值<0.001)之间存在很强的正显著关系。对于 DLP 估计值;DLP 与总 mAs(r=0.6812,p 值<0.001)和参考 mAs(r=0.5493,p 值<0.001)之间存在中度正显著关系。DRLs 如下:头部 CT 扫描的平均中位数 CTDIvol 为 56.02mGy,DLP 为 1260.3mGy.cm;胸部 CT 的 CTDI 体积为 7.82mGy,DLP 为 377.0mGy.cm;腹部 CT 的 CTDI 体积为 12.54mGy,DLP 为 1418.3mGy.cm,腰椎为 19.48mGy,DLP 为 843mGy.cm。

结论

本研究证实需要优化 CT 扫描参数以降低国家 DRL。这可以通过对所有 CT 扫描放射技师进行广泛的培训来实现,以优化 CT 扫描采集参数。还建议进行连续剂量审核,包括新设备或每三年一次,以确保超出范围的值是合理的,或者需要进一步调查。

相似文献

1
Adult Computed Tomography examinations in Uganda: Towards determining the National Diagnostic Reference Levels.乌干达成人计算机断层扫描检查:确定国家诊断参考水平。
BMC Med Imaging. 2022 Jun 11;22(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12880-022-00838-x.
2
Development of size-specific institutional diagnostic reference levels for computed tomography protocols in neck imaging.制定针对颈部成像的计算机断层扫描协议的特定于大小的机构诊断参考水平。
J Radiol Prot. 2020 Mar;40(1):68-82. doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/ab4d00. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
3
ESTABLISHMENT OF REGIONAL DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS IN ADULT COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY FOR FOUR AFRICAN COUNTRIES: A PRELIMINARY SURVEY.四个非洲国家成人计算机断层扫描区域诊断参考水平的建立:一项初步调查。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2022 Jun 9;198(7):414-422. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncac074.
4
Establishment of local diagnostic reference levels for common adult CT examinations: a multicenter survey in Addis Ababa.建立常见成人 CT 检查的局部诊断参考水平:亚的斯亚贝巴的多中心调查。
BMC Med Imaging. 2023 Jan 9;23(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12880-023-00963-1.
5
Diagnostic reference levels for chest computed tomography in children as a function of patient size.儿童胸部 CT 诊断参考水平与患者体型的关系。
Pediatr Radiol. 2022 Jul;52(8):1446-1455. doi: 10.1007/s00247-022-05340-8. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
6
Establishment of local diagnostic reference levels for computed tomography with cloud-based automated dose-tracking software in Türkiye.土耳其应用基于云的自动剂量跟踪软件建立 CT 局部诊断参考水平。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2024 May 13;30(3):205-211. doi: 10.4274/dir.2023.232265. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
7
SURVEY OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY PRACTICE IN UKRAINE AND ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS FOR MOST COMMON CT EXAMINATIONS OF ADULTS.乌克兰计算机断层扫描实践调查及建立成人最常见 CT 检查的国家诊断参考水平。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2023 Jun 23;199(10):1142-1150. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncad157.
8
Establishment of CT diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for a Singapore healthcare cluster.为新加坡一个医疗保健集团建立CT诊断参考水平(DRLs)。
Radiography (Lond). 2023 Jan;29(1):184-189. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2022.11.002. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
9
Size-specific dose estimates of adult, chest computed tomography examinations: Comparison of Chinese and updated 2017 American College of Radiology diagnostic reference levels based on the water-equivalent diameter.基于水当量直径的成人胸部 CT 检查的体模特异性剂量估算:中国和更新的 2017 年美国放射学会诊断参考水平的比较。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 13;16(9):e0257294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257294. eCollection 2021.
10
Typical Diagnostic Reference Levels of Common Indications for Computed Tomography Scans Among Adult Patients in Uganda: a Cross-sectional Study.乌干达成年患者计算机断层扫描常见适应症的典型诊断参考水平:一项横断面研究
Res Sq. 2023 Mar 22:rs.3.rs-2683913. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2683913/v1.

引用本文的文献

1
Recommended National diagnostic reference levels for adult abdomino-pelvic computed tomography examinations in Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚成人腹部盆腔计算机断层扫描检查的国家推荐诊断参考水平。
BMC Med Imaging. 2025 May 19;25(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12880-025-01702-4.
2
Evaluating Radiation Exposures and Establishments of National Diagnostic Reference Levels for Patients Undergoing Chest Computed Tomography Examinations in Ethiopia.评估埃塞俄比亚接受胸部计算机断层扫描检查患者的辐射暴露情况并确定国家诊断参考水平
Radiol Res Pract. 2025 Mar 27;2025:8206399. doi: 10.1155/rrp/8206399. eCollection 2025.
3
Establishment of Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for Head CT Imaging in the Madina Region, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯麦地那地区头部CT成像本地诊断参考水平的建立。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 21;14(24):2882. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14242882.
4
Clinical diagnostic reference levels and image quality metrics for CT in oncology patients.肿瘤患者CT的临床诊断参考水平和图像质量指标
SA J Radiol. 2024 Oct 31;28(1):2960. doi: 10.4102/sajr.v28i1.2960. eCollection 2024.
5
Paediatric computed tomography diagnostic reference levels in Africa: A systematic review.非洲儿科计算机断层扫描诊断参考水平:一项系统评价。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2025 Mar;72(1):139-147. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.824. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
6
Application of Medical Image Navigation Technology in Minimally Invasive Puncture Robot.医学影像导航技术在微创穿刺机器人中的应用。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Aug 16;23(16):7196. doi: 10.3390/s23167196.
7
Establishment of local diagnostic reference levels for common adult CT examinations: a multicenter survey in Addis Ababa.建立常见成人 CT 检查的局部诊断参考水平:亚的斯亚贝巴的多中心调查。
BMC Med Imaging. 2023 Jan 9;23(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12880-023-00963-1.

本文引用的文献

1
High Mortality During the Second Wave of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic in Uganda: Experience From a National Referral COVID-19 Treatment Unit.乌干达2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情第二波期间的高死亡率:一家国家级COVID-19转诊治疗单位的经验
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 18;8(11):ofab530. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab530. eCollection 2021 Nov.
2
Characteristics and outcomes of admitted patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Uganda.乌干达住院感染 SARS-CoV-2 患者的特征和结局。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020 Sep;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000646.
3
Updated Australian diagnostic reference levels for adult CT.澳大利亚成人CT的更新诊断参考水平。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2020 Mar;67(1):5-15. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.372. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
4
Diagnostic reference levels for common computed tomography (CT) examinations: results from the first Nigerian nationwide dose survey.常见计算机断层扫描(CT)检查的诊断参考水平:尼日利亚首次全国剂量调查结果
J Radiol Prot. 2018 Jun;38(2):525-535. doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/aaaaf8. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
5
Using diagnostic reference levels to evaluate the improvement of patient dose optimisation and the influence of recent technologies in radiography and computed tomography.使用诊断参考水平评估放射摄影和计算机断层摄影新技术对患者剂量优化的改进和影响。
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Jan;98:68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
6
ICRP Publication 135: Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical Imaging.国际放射防护委员会第135号出版物:医学成像中的诊断参考水平
Ann ICRP. 2017 Oct;46(1):1-144. doi: 10.1177/0146645317717209.
7
Establishing national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for computed tomography in Egypt.在埃及建立计算机断层扫描的国家诊断参考水平(DRLs)。
Phys Med. 2017 Jul;39:16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.05.050. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
8
Predictors of CT Radiation Dose and Their Effect on Patient Care: A Comprehensive Analysis Using Automated Data.CT辐射剂量的预测因素及其对患者护理的影响:使用自动化数据的综合分析
Radiology. 2017 Jan;282(1):182-193. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016151391. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
9
Effective radiation doses of CT examinations in Japan: a nationwide questionnaire-based study.日本CT检查的有效辐射剂量:一项基于全国问卷调查的研究。
Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1058):20150671. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150671. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
10
Patient doses from CT examinations in Turkey.土耳其CT检查的患者剂量。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2015 Sep-Oct;21(5):428-34. doi: 10.5152/dir.2015.14306.