• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何评估哮喘生物制剂的疗效,以及在没有获益时应采取的措施。

How to Assess Effectiveness of Biologics for Asthma and What Steps to Take When There Is Not Benefit.

机构信息

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Fla.

Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Mar;9(3):1081-1088. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.10.048.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaip.2020.10.048
PMID:33685606
Abstract

Five biologic medications are approved in the United States for the treatment of asthma that is not well controlled with other therapies. All target asthma with elevated type 2 inflammatory markers, such as elevated eosinophils, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, or total and specific IgE. Asthma severity, phenotype, age, biomarkers, treatment goals/outcomes, comorbid conditions, safety, and cost should all help guide the initial biologic choice. In addition, a shared decision-making process with the patient is needed to optimize adherence, with special attention to patient preference regarding outcomes, safety concerns, and medication administration options. After a biologic agent is initiated, sufficient time is needed to monitor efficacy and response. For patients who do not respond favorably, patient-, disease-, and medication-related factors should be considered and remedied, if possible. Persistent suboptimal responders necessitate a reexamination of asthma phenotype, biomarkers, and the suspected immune response pathways. For some patients, a change in biologic therapy or other therapeutic options may be warranted. In this review, we examine the clinical approach for choosing an initial biologic for the treatment of asthma, the assessment of response to biologics, and the process of troubleshooting and adjusting biologic treatment for those patients with suboptimal responses.

摘要

五种生物制剂已获美国批准用于治疗经其他疗法治疗后仍控制不佳的哮喘。所有生物制剂均针对伴有 2 型炎症标志物升高的哮喘,如嗜酸性粒细胞、呼出气一氧化氮分数、总 IgE 和特异性 IgE 升高。哮喘严重程度、表型、年龄、生物标志物、治疗目标/结果、合并症、安全性和成本均应有助于指导初始生物制剂选择。此外,需要与患者进行共同决策过程,以优化治疗的依从性,特别要关注患者对结果、安全性问题和药物管理选择的偏好。开始使用生物制剂后,需要足够的时间来监测疗效和反应。对于反应不佳的患者,应考虑并纠正与患者、疾病和药物相关的因素(如果可能的话)。持续治疗反应欠佳者需要重新检查哮喘表型、生物标志物和疑似免疫反应途径。对于某些患者,可能需要改变生物治疗或其他治疗选择。在这篇综述中,我们探讨了选择初始生物制剂治疗哮喘的临床方法、对生物制剂反应的评估以及对治疗反应不佳患者进行故障排除和调整生物治疗的过程。

相似文献

1
How to Assess Effectiveness of Biologics for Asthma and What Steps to Take When There Is Not Benefit.如何评估哮喘生物制剂的疗效,以及在没有获益时应采取的措施。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Mar;9(3):1081-1088. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.10.048.
2
Safety of Biological Therapies for Severe Asthma: An Analysis of Suspected Adverse Reactions Reported in the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database.重度哮喘生物疗法的安全性:对世界卫生组织药物警戒数据库中报告的疑似不良反应的分析。
BioDrugs. 2024 May;38(3):425-448. doi: 10.1007/s40259-024-00653-6. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
3
Biologics in the treatment of asthma in children and adolescents.生物制剂在儿童和青少年哮喘治疗中的应用
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2023 Mar;151(3):581-589. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.01.002. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
4
Pragmatic Clinical Perspective on Biologics for Severe Refractory Type 2 Asthma.关于生物制剂治疗重度难治性2型哮喘的实用临床观点
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Nov-Dec;8(10):3363-3370. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.06.048. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
5
Choice of biologics in asthma endotypes.哮喘表型的生物制剂选择。
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Feb 1;21(1):79-85. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000708.
6
The Current State of Biologic Therapies for Treatment of Refractory Asthma.生物疗法治疗难治性哮喘的现状。
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2020 Oct;59(2):195-207. doi: 10.1007/s12016-020-08776-8.
7
Efficacy and safety of treatment with biologicals (benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab and reslizumab) for severe eosinophilic asthma. A systematic review for the EAACI Guidelines - recommendations on the use of biologicals in severe asthma.生物制剂(贝那利珠单抗、度普利尤单抗、美泊利单抗、奥马珠单抗和瑞利珠单抗)治疗重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘的疗效和安全性。EAACI指南的系统评价——关于生物制剂在重度哮喘中应用的建议
Allergy. 2020 May;75(5):1023-1042. doi: 10.1111/all.14221. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
8
An Emerging Role for Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Guiding Biological Treatment in Severe Asthma.呼出气一氧化氮在指导严重哮喘生物治疗中的新作用。
Curr Med Chem. 2020;27(42):7159-7167. doi: 10.2174/0929867327666200713184659.
9
Biological treatments for severe asthma: where do we stand?重度哮喘的生物治疗:我们目前的进展如何?
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Dec;18(6):509-518. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000487.
10
Comparative Impact of Asthma Biologics: A Nationwide US Claim-Based Analysis.哮喘生物制剂的比较影响:一项基于全美索赔数据的分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 Jun;12(6):1558-1567. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.02.029. Epub 2024 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Requalification of patients with severe asthma for biological therapy-Practical 'ReQuaBi' rate decision scheme based on the analytical model.重度哮喘患者生物治疗的重新资格认定——基于分析模型的实用“ReQuaBi”率决策方案
Clin Transl Allergy. 2025 May;15(5):e70059. doi: 10.1002/clt2.70059.
2
Sustained Effectiveness of Benralizumab in Naïve and Biologics-Experienced Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Patients: Results from the ANANKE Study.倍利珠单抗在初治及使用过生物制剂的重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者中的持续疗效:ANANKE研究结果
J Asthma Allergy. 2024 Mar 27;17:273-290. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S438981. eCollection 2024.
3
Safety of Biological Therapies for Severe Asthma: An Analysis of Suspected Adverse Reactions Reported in the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database.
重度哮喘生物疗法的安全性:对世界卫生组织药物警戒数据库中报告的疑似不良反应的分析。
BioDrugs. 2024 May;38(3):425-448. doi: 10.1007/s40259-024-00653-6. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
4
Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in a Case of Chronic Urticaria following Omalizumab Therapy.奥马珠单抗治疗后慢性荨麻疹患者的结核病诊断
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Nov 24;12(12):1655. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12121655.
5
Unanswered questions on the use of biologics in pediatric asthma.关于生物制剂在儿童哮喘治疗中应用的未解决问题。
World Allergy Organ J. 2023 Nov 3;16(11):100837. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100837. eCollection 2023 Nov.
6
Risks and safety of biologics: A practical guide for allergists.生物制剂的风险与安全性:过敏症专科医生实用指南。
World Allergy Organ J. 2023 Jan 16;16(1):100737. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2022.100737. eCollection 2023 Jan.
7
Switch patterns in a cohort of individuals with asthma who received omalizumab or mepolizumab therapy.接受奥马珠单抗或美泊利单抗治疗的哮喘患者队列中的转换模式。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Mar;11(3):946-948.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.10.047. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
8
[Eosinophilic dermatoses].[嗜酸性皮肤病]
Dermatologie (Heidelb). 2022 Dec;73(12):965-972. doi: 10.1007/s00105-022-05071-9. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
9
Patient Characteristics Associated With Reactions to Mrgprx2-Activating Drugs in an Electronic Health Record-Linked Biobank.与 Mrgprx2 激活药物反应相关的患者特征的电子健康记录相关生物库。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Feb;11(2):492-499.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.11.001. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
10
Systematic review of monotherapy with biologicals for children and adults with IgE-mediated food allergy.针对 IgE 介导的食物过敏的儿童和成人使用生物制剂进行单药治疗的系统评价。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2022 Sep 27;12(9):e12123. doi: 10.1002/clt2.12123. eCollection 2022 Sep.