HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Ann Fam Med. 2021 Mar-Apr;19(2):110-116. doi: 10.1370/afm.2646.
The aim of this study was to determine what strategies and factors are most important for high performance in the primary care of patients with diabetes.
We performed a mixed-methods, cross-sectional, observational analysis of interviews and characteristics of primary care clinics in Minnesota and bordering areas. We compared strategies, facilitators, and barriers identified by 31 leaders of 17 clinics in high-, middle-, and low-performance quartiles on a standardized composite measure of diabetes outcomes for 416 of 586 primary care clinics. Semistructured interview data were combined with quantitative data regarding clinic performance and a survey of the presence of care management processes.
The interview analysis identified 10 themes providing unique insights into the factors and strategies characterizing the 3 performance groups. The main difference was the degree to which top-performing clinics used patient data to guide proactive and outreach methods to intensify treatment and monitor effect. Top clinics also appeared to view visit-based care management processes as necessary but insufficient, whereas all respondents regarded being part of a large system as mostly helpful.
Top-performing clinic approaches to diabetes care differ from lower-performing clinics primarily by emphasizing data-driven proactive outreach to patients to intensify treatment. Although confirmatory studies are needed, clinical leaders should consider the value of this paradigm shift in approach to care.
本研究旨在确定在糖尿病患者的初级保健中取得优异成绩的最重要策略和因素。
我们对明尼苏达州和周边地区的初级保健诊所进行了混合方法、横断面、观察性分析,对访谈和特征进行了分析。我们比较了 31 位来自 17 个诊所的领导者的策略、促进因素和障碍,这些诊所根据标准化的糖尿病综合结局衡量标准,分为高、中、低绩效四分位数。半结构化访谈数据与关于诊所绩效的定量数据以及护理管理流程调查相结合。
访谈分析确定了 10 个主题,为了解区分 3 个绩效组的特征因素和策略提供了独特的见解。主要区别在于顶级诊所使用患者数据来指导主动和外展方法以加强治疗和监测效果的程度。顶级诊所似乎还认为基于就诊的护理管理流程是必要的,但还不够充分,而所有受访者都认为成为大型系统的一部分主要是有帮助的。
表现最佳的诊所的糖尿病护理方法与表现较差的诊所主要区别在于强调数据驱动的主动接触患者以加强治疗。尽管需要进一步的验证性研究,但临床领导者应该考虑这种方法转变的价值。