Suppr超能文献

基层医疗中糖尿病管理的卓越表现策略及相关因素:一项混合方法研究的启示。

Strategies and Factors Associated With Top Performance in Primary Care for Diabetes: Insights From a Mixed Methods Study.

机构信息

HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

出版信息

Ann Fam Med. 2021 Mar-Apr;19(2):110-116. doi: 10.1370/afm.2646.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine what strategies and factors are most important for high performance in the primary care of patients with diabetes.

METHODS

We performed a mixed-methods, cross-sectional, observational analysis of interviews and characteristics of primary care clinics in Minnesota and bordering areas. We compared strategies, facilitators, and barriers identified by 31 leaders of 17 clinics in high-, middle-, and low-performance quartiles on a standardized composite measure of diabetes outcomes for 416 of 586 primary care clinics. Semistructured interview data were combined with quantitative data regarding clinic performance and a survey of the presence of care management processes.

RESULTS

The interview analysis identified 10 themes providing unique insights into the factors and strategies characterizing the 3 performance groups. The main difference was the degree to which top-performing clinics used patient data to guide proactive and outreach methods to intensify treatment and monitor effect. Top clinics also appeared to view visit-based care management processes as necessary but insufficient, whereas all respondents regarded being part of a large system as mostly helpful.

CONCLUSIONS

Top-performing clinic approaches to diabetes care differ from lower-performing clinics primarily by emphasizing data-driven proactive outreach to patients to intensify treatment. Although confirmatory studies are needed, clinical leaders should consider the value of this paradigm shift in approach to care.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定在糖尿病患者的初级保健中取得优异成绩的最重要策略和因素。

方法

我们对明尼苏达州和周边地区的初级保健诊所进行了混合方法、横断面、观察性分析,对访谈和特征进行了分析。我们比较了 31 位来自 17 个诊所的领导者的策略、促进因素和障碍,这些诊所根据标准化的糖尿病综合结局衡量标准,分为高、中、低绩效四分位数。半结构化访谈数据与关于诊所绩效的定量数据以及护理管理流程调查相结合。

结果

访谈分析确定了 10 个主题,为了解区分 3 个绩效组的特征因素和策略提供了独特的见解。主要区别在于顶级诊所使用患者数据来指导主动和外展方法以加强治疗和监测效果的程度。顶级诊所似乎还认为基于就诊的护理管理流程是必要的,但还不够充分,而所有受访者都认为成为大型系统的一部分主要是有帮助的。

结论

表现最佳的诊所的糖尿病护理方法与表现较差的诊所主要区别在于强调数据驱动的主动接触患者以加强治疗。尽管需要进一步的验证性研究,但临床领导者应该考虑这种方法转变的价值。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Reflections on the Chronic Care Model-23 Years Later.23年后对慢性病照护模式的反思。
Milbank Q. 2019 Sep;97(3):665-668. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12414. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
4
Evaluation of the Cascade of Diabetes Care in the United States, 2005-2016.2005 - 2016年美国糖尿病照护级联评估
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Oct 1;179(10):1376-1385. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2396.
5
Trends in Quality of Care for Patients with CKD in the United States.美国慢性肾脏病患者护理质量的变化趋势。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019 Aug 7;14(8):1142-1150. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00060119. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
7
Public reporting and the evolution of diabetes quality.公共报告与糖尿病质量的演变
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2015 Mar;15(1):127-138. doi: 10.1007/s10754-015-9167-z. Epub 2015 Mar 6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验