• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体间冲突中导致平民伤亡的决策的认知和神经基础。

Cognitive and neural bases of decision-making causing civilian casualties during intergroup conflict.

作者信息

Han Xiaochun, Zhou Shuai, Fahoum Nardine, Wu Taoyu, Gao Tianyu, Shamay-Tsoory Simone, Gelfand Michele J, Wu Xinhuai, Han Shihui

机构信息

School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.

PKU-IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Peking University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Sep;5(9):1214-1225. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01064-1. Epub 2021 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1038/s41562-021-01064-1
PMID:33686202
Abstract

Civilian casualties occur during military attacks. Such 'collateral damage' is prohibited by international laws but increases with substantial consequences when intergroup conflict escalates. Here, we investigate cognitive and neural bases of decision-making processes resulting in civilian harm, using a task that simulates punishment decision-making during intergroup conflict. We test two groups of Chinese participants in a laboratory setting, and members of two ethnic groups (Jewish and Palestinian) in Israel. The results dissociate two psychological constructs, harm preference and harm avoidance, which respectively characterize punishment decision-making related to outgroup combatants and outgroup noncombatants during intergroup conflict. In particular, individuals show decreased avoidance of harming outgroup noncombatants when conflict escalates. Brain imaging (functional magnetic resonance imaging) reveals that decreased harm avoidance is predicted by inhibition of the left middle frontal activity during selection of punishment decisions. Our findings provide insight into the cognitive and neural bases of decision-making involving civilian harm during intergroup conflict.

摘要

平民伤亡发生在军事攻击期间。这种“附带损害”为国际法所禁止,但随着群体间冲突的升级而增加,且后果严重。在此,我们使用一项模拟群体间冲突中惩罚决策的任务,来研究导致平民伤害的决策过程的认知和神经基础。我们在实验室环境中测试了两组中国参与者,以及以色列两个族群(犹太人和巴勒斯坦人)的成员。结果区分了两种心理结构,即伤害偏好和伤害回避,它们分别表征了群体间冲突期间与外群体战斗人员和外群体非战斗人员相关的惩罚决策。特别是,当冲突升级时,个体对伤害外群体非战斗人员的回避减少。脑成像(功能磁共振成像)显示,在选择惩罚决策时,左侧额中回活动受到抑制预示着伤害回避的减少。我们的研究结果为群体间冲突中涉及平民伤害的决策的认知和神经基础提供了见解。

相似文献

1
Cognitive and neural bases of decision-making causing civilian casualties during intergroup conflict.群体间冲突中导致平民伤亡的决策的认知和神经基础。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Sep;5(9):1214-1225. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01064-1. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
2
Intergroup conflict self-perpetuates via meaning: Exposure to intergroup conflict increases meaning and fuels a desire for further conflict.群体间冲突通过意义自我延续:接触群体间冲突会增加意义,并激发进一步冲突的欲望。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Jan;116(1):119-140. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000169. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
3
Social cognition in members of conflict groups: behavioural and neural responses in Arabs, Israelis and South Americans to each other's misfortunes.冲突群体成员的社会认知:阿拉伯人、以色列人和南美人对彼此不幸的行为和神经反应。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Mar 5;367(1589):717-30. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0293.
4
Neural correlations of the influence of self-relevance on moral decision-making involving a trade-off between harm and reward.自我相关性对涉及伤害与奖励权衡的道德决策的影响的神经关联。
Psychophysiology. 2020 Sep;57(9):e13590. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13590. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
5
Examining the Role of the Human Hippocampus in Approach-Avoidance Decision Making Using a Novel Conflict Paradigm and Multivariate Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.使用新型冲突范式和多变量功能磁共振成像研究人类海马体在趋避决策中的作用。
J Neurosci. 2015 Nov 11;35(45):15039-49. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1915-15.2015.
6
Dialogue intervention to youth amidst intractable conflict attenuates stress response to outgroup.对话干预青少年在难以解决的冲突中减弱对外群体的应激反应。
Horm Behav. 2019 Apr;110:68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.02.013. Epub 2019 Mar 9.
7
In-between group membership within intergroup conflicts: The case of Druze in Israel.群体间冲突中的群体成员身份:以以色列德鲁兹人为例。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2024 Oct;63(4):1899-1921. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12760. Epub 2024 May 22.
8
The enemy's gaze: Immersive virtual environments enhance peace promoting attitudes and emotions in violent intergroup conflicts.敌意在眼前:沉浸式虚拟环境增强暴力群体冲突中的和平促进态度和情绪。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 11;14(9):e0222342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222342. eCollection 2019.
9
Adolescents growing up amidst intractable conflict attenuate brain response to pain of outgroup.在棘手冲突中成长的青少年会减弱大脑对群体外疼痛的反应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 29;113(48):13696-13701. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1612903113. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
10
Neural substrates of approach-avoidance conflict decision-making.趋近-回避冲突决策的神经基础。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Feb;36(2):449-62. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22639. Epub 2014 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural Tracking of Race-Related Information During Face Perception.面部感知过程中与种族相关信息的神经追踪
Neurosci Bull. 2025 May 22. doi: 10.1007/s12264-025-01419-y.
2
The paradoxical brain: paradoxes impact conflict perspectives through increased neural alignment.矛盾的大脑:矛盾通过增加神经一致性来影响冲突观点。
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Sep 3;34(9). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae353.
3
The social transmission of empathy relies on observational reinforcement learning.同理心的社会传递依赖于观察强化学习。

本文引用的文献

1
A neurobiological association of revenge propensity during intergroup conflict.群体间冲突期间报复倾向的神经生物学关联。
Elife. 2020 Mar 3;9:e52014. doi: 10.7554/eLife.52014.
2
Oxytocin promotes coordinated out-group attack during intergroup conflict in humans.催产素促进人类群体间冲突期间对外群体的协调攻击。
Elife. 2019 Jan 25;8:e40698. doi: 10.7554/eLife.40698.
3
Neurocognitive Basis of Racial Ingroup Bias in Empathy.共情中内群体种族偏见的神经认知基础。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Feb 27;121(9):e2313073121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2313073121. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
4
Neural representation of perceived race mediates the opposite relationship between subcomponents of self-construals and racial outgroup punishment.感知到的种族的神经表现调节了自我建构的子成分与对外群体惩罚之间的相反关系。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Jun 20;33(13):8759-8772. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad157.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 May;22(5):400-421. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Mar 18.
4
Adolescents growing up amidst intractable conflict attenuate brain response to pain of outgroup.在棘手冲突中成长的青少年会减弱大脑对群体外疼痛的反应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 29;113(48):13696-13701. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1612903113. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
5
Parsing the Behavioral and Brain Mechanisms of Third-Party Punishment.解析第三方惩罚的行为及大脑机制
J Neurosci. 2016 Sep 7;36(36):9420-34. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4499-15.2016.
6
In-group defense, out-group aggression, and coordination failures in intergroup conflict.群体内防御、群体间攻击以及群体间冲突中的协调失败。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Sep 20;113(38):10524-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1605115113. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
7
The Emerging Neuroscience of Third-Party Punishment.第三方惩罚的新兴神经科学
Trends Neurosci. 2016 Aug;39(8):499-501. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2016.06.004.
8
The Human Brainnetome Atlas: A New Brain Atlas Based on Connectional Architecture.人类脑网络组图谱:基于连接结构的新脑图谱。
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Aug;26(8):3508-26. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw157. Epub 2016 May 26.
9
They see us as less than human: Metadehumanization predicts intergroup conflict via reciprocal dehumanization.他们将我们视为低人一等:元非人化通过相互非人化预测群体间冲突。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Mar;110(3):343-70. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000044.
10
A Culture-Behavior-Brain Loop Model of Human Development.文化-行为-大脑环路模型:人类发展的视角
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Nov;19(11):666-676. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.010. Epub 2015 Oct 2.