Brandmayr Federico
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Int J Polit Cult Soc. 2021;34(1):47-68. doi: 10.1007/s10767-019-09346-3. Epub 2019 Dec 21.
Building on recent work in the sociology of intellectual interventions, the study of cultural boundaries of science, and the role of ideas in politics, the article develops a theory of public epistemologies as argumentative tools people use to support or oppose political positions. Two prominent public epistemologies that have recently crystallized in Italian politics are taken as illustrations, with special attention paid to the role of two academics (an economist and an immunologist) turned public intellectuals. The article argues that the rise of populism in Italy has contributed to unusual alignments between political and epistemological positions, which has made questions about science and expert knowledge much more relevant in contesting and supporting political decisions.
基于近期在知识干预社会学、科学的文化边界研究以及观念在政治中的作用等方面的工作,本文提出了一种关于公共认识论的理论,将其视为人们用于支持或反对政治立场的论证工具。文章以意大利政治中最近形成的两种突出的公共认识论为例进行说明,特别关注了两位从学者转变为公共知识分子的人士(一位经济学家和一位免疫学家)所起的作用。文章认为,意大利民粹主义的兴起导致了政治立场与认识论立场之间不同寻常的结盟,这使得关于科学和专家知识的问题在对政治决策的质疑和支持中变得更加重要。