Moreno Gage K, Braun Katarina M, Pray Ian W, Segaloff Hannah E, Lim Ailam, Poulson Keith, Meiman Jonathan, Borcher James, Westergaard Ryan P, Moll Michael K, Friedrich Thomas C, O'Connor David H
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison USA 53711.
Department of Pathobiological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison USA 53711.
medRxiv. 2021 Mar 6:2021.03.03.21252838. doi: 10.1101/2021.03.03.21252838.
High frequency, rapid turnaround SARS-CoV-2 testing continues to be proposed as a way of efficiently identifying and mitigating transmission in congregate settings. However, two SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks occurred among intercollegiate university athletic programs during the fall 2020 semester despite mandatory directly observed daily antigen testing.
During the fall 2020 semester, athletes and staff in both programs were tested daily using Quidel's Sofia SARS Antigen Fluorescent Immunoassay (FIA), with positive antigen results requiring confirmatory testing with real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We used genomic sequencing to investigate transmission dynamics in these two outbreaks.
In Outbreak 1, 32 confirmed cases occurred within a university athletics program after the index patient attended a meeting while infectious despite a negative antigen test on the day of the meeting. Among isolates sequenced from Outbreak 1, 24 (92%) of 26 were closely related, suggesting sustained transmission following an initial introduction event. In Outbreak 2, 12 confirmed cases occurred among athletes from two university programs that faced each other in an athletic competition despite receiving negative antigen test results on the day of the competition. Sequences from both teams were closely related and unique from strains circulating in the community, suggesting transmission during intercollegiate competition.
These findings suggest that antigen testing alone, even when mandated and directly observed, may not be sufficient as an intervention to prevent SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks in congregate settings, and highlights the importance of supplementing serial antigen testing with appropriate mitigation strategies to prevent SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in congregate settings.
High frequency, rapid turnaround SARS-CoV-2 testing continues to be proposed as a way of efficiently identifying and mitigating transmission in congregate settings. However, here we describe two SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks occurred among intercollegiate university athletic programs during the fall 2020 semester.
高频、快速周转的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)检测仍被提议作为一种在聚集场所有效识别和减轻传播的方法。然而,在2020年秋季学期,尽管有强制性的每日直接观察抗原检测,校际大学体育项目中仍发生了两起SARS-CoV-2疫情。
在2020年秋季学期,两个项目中的运动员和工作人员每天使用奎德尔公司的索非亚SARS抗原荧光免疫分析法(FIA)进行检测,抗原检测呈阳性结果需要通过实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)进行确认检测。我们使用基因组测序来调查这两起疫情中的传播动态。
在疫情1中,一名索引患者在具有传染性时参加了一次会议,尽管会议当天抗原检测呈阴性,但在一所大学体育项目中仍出现了32例确诊病例。在疫情1测序的分离株中,26株中有24株(92%)密切相关,表明在最初的引入事件后出现了持续传播。在疫情2中,来自两个在体育比赛中相互对抗的大学项目的运动员中出现了12例确诊病例,尽管比赛当天抗原检测结果为阴性。两个团队的序列密切相关,且与社区中传播的毒株不同,表明在大学校际比赛期间发生了传播。
这些发现表明,仅靠抗原检测,即使是在强制且直接观察的情况下,可能不足以作为预防聚集场所SARS-CoV-2疫情的干预措施,并突出了用适当的缓解策略补充系列抗原检测以预防聚集场所SARS-CoV-2疫情的重要性。
高频、快速周转的SARS-CoV-2检测仍被提议作为一种在聚集场所有效识别和减轻传播的方法。然而,在此我们描述了在2020年秋季学期校际大学体育项目中发生的两起SARS-CoV-2疫情。