• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以能力为导向保障职业权利:专业义务。

Securing occupational rights by addressing capabilities: A professional obligation.

机构信息

Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

Scand J Occup Ther. 2022 Jan;29(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2021.1895308. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1080/11038128.2021.1895308
PMID:33689552
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The World Federation of Occupational Therapists asserts that all occupational therapists are obligated to promote occupational rights, and has highlighted the importance of Amartya Sen's concept of 'capabilities' to the work of securing the occupational rights to which all are equally entitled.

AIMS

To outline the capabilities approach and highlight its relevance and importance for the occupational therapy profession.

MATERIAL & METHODS: Drawing from Sen's work, and that of other scholars who have critiqued and adapted his capabilities approach, this paper describes the foundational components of the capabilities approach and identifies important overlaps with issues of concern to occupational therapy.

RESULTS

Sen's capabilities approach employs a contextualised view of human wellbeing; attending to whether people have the abilities to do the things they would value doing, whether their circumstances actually provide the real opportunities to choose to do what they would value doing.

CONCLUSIONS

The capabilities approach, with its attention to abilities and actions, options and opportunities, empowerment and choice, justice and participation, has clear relevance for occupational therapists.

SIGNIFICANCE

A capabilities perspective provides a valuable framework for occupational therapists striving towards equalising people's opportunities, possibilities and choices - their capabilities - to secure their occupational rights.

摘要

背景

世界作业治疗师联合会声明所有作业治疗师都有义务促进作业权利,并强调阿玛蒂亚·森的“能力”概念对确保所有人都平等享有的作业权利的重要性。

目的

概述能力方法,并强调其对作业治疗专业的相关性和重要性。

材料与方法

本文借鉴森的著作以及其他批判性和适应性采用其能力方法的学者的著作,描述了能力方法的基本组成部分,并确定了与作业治疗关注的问题的重要重叠。

结果

森的能力方法采用了一种关注人类福祉的背景化视角;关注人们是否具备做他们认为有价值的事情的能力,以及他们的环境是否真正提供了选择做他们认为有价值的事情的实际机会。

结论

能力方法关注能力和行动、选择和机会、赋权和选择、正义和参与,对作业治疗师具有明显的相关性。

意义

能力视角为努力实现平等人民的机会、可能性和选择——即他们的能力——以保障他们的作业权利的作业治疗师提供了一个有价值的框架。

相似文献

1
Securing occupational rights by addressing capabilities: A professional obligation.以能力为导向保障职业权利:专业义务。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2022 Jan;29(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2021.1895308. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
2
Quality of life, participation and occupational rights: A capabilities perspective.生活质量、参与和职业权利:一种能力视角。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2015 Apr;62(2):78-85. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12183. Epub 2015 Feb 6.
3
Critical reflections on occupational justice: Toward a rights-based approach to occupational opportunities.对职业正义的批判性反思:迈向基于权利的职业机会方法。
Can J Occup Ther. 2017 Feb;84(1):47-57. doi: 10.1177/0008417416654501. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
4
Well-being and occupational rights: an imperative for critical occupational therapy.福祉与职业权利:批判性职业治疗的当务之急。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2012 Sep;19(5):385-94. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2011.611821. Epub 2011 Sep 12.
5
Capabilities and Choices: Do They Make Sen'se for Understanding Objective and Subjective Well-Being? An Empirical Test of Sen's Capability Framework on German and British Panel Data.能力与选择:它们对理解客观和主观幸福感有意义吗?对德国和英国面板数据进行的森能力框架实证检验
Soc Indic Res. 2013 Feb;110(3):1159-1185. doi: 10.1007/s11205-011-9978-3. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
6
Empowerment and occupation: A new perspective.赋权与职业:一种新视角。
Can J Occup Ther. 2016 Dec;83(5):281-287. doi: 10.1177/0008417416652910. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
7
Towards inclusive occupational therapy: Introducing the CORE approach for inclusive and occupation-focused practice.迈向包容性职业疗法:引入以包容性和职业为重点的CORE方法。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2017 Dec;64(6):429-435. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12394. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
8
Building back better: Imagining an occupational therapy for a post-COVID-19 world.重建更美好:想象一个后 COVID-19 世界的职业治疗。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2021 Oct;68(5):444-453. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12760. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
9
The Concept of Oppression and Occupational Therapy: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis.压迫概念与作业治疗:批判性综合解读。
Can J Occup Ther. 2021 Dec;88(4):407-417. doi: 10.1177/00084174211051168. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
10
Occupation in Natural Environments; Health Equity and Environmental Justice.自然环境中的职业;健康公平与环境正义。
Can J Occup Ther. 2021 Dec;88(4):319-328. doi: 10.1177/00084174211040000. Epub 2021 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence in everyday life is limited by institutional cultures: A photo elicitation interview study with frail older persons in Swedish residential aged care facilities.日常生活中的影响力受机构文化的限制:一项对瑞典老年护理机构中体弱老年人的照片引发式访谈研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 28;20(2):e0319059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319059. eCollection 2025.
2
Mobilizing Critical Occupational Therapy Praxis to Promote Structural Justice, Equity, and Rights.调动关键职业治疗实践以促进结构性正义、公平和权利。
Can J Occup Ther. 2024 Dec;91(4):305-324. doi: 10.1177/00084174241277950. Epub 2024 Oct 10.