NCD Center of Excellence, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Research Center for Infectious Diseases and Substance Use, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2021 Mar 7;15(2):289-296. doi: 10.3855/jidc.12864.
Increased risk of cardiovascular disease in HIV-infected patients was tought to be the cause of multiple mechanistic factors, which changing the HIV care landscape. Antiretroviral therapy (ART), especially protease inhibitors (PI), is one of common HIV treatments that may have some association with this. The mechanism of PI in comparison to other regimens, however, are not clearly understood.
Age-and gender-match HIV-infected patients treated with either boosted-PI-based regimen (boosted-PI group, N=30) or NNRTI-based ART (non-PI group, N = 30) were recruited for this cross-sectional study. Parameters determined cardiovascular risks, inflammation, endothelial function, and bone metabolic function were evaluated.
Compared with non-PI, patients in the boosted-PI group had more evidence of dyslipidemia. No statistical difference in the prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis was found between the two groups. Circulating levels of inflammatory markers, C-reactive protein (CRP) (5.4±9.1 vs. 14.9 ± 19.4 mg/L, p = 0.019) and lectin-liked oxidized lipoprotein receptor-1 (LOX-1) (387 ± 299 vs. 554 ± 324 pg/mL, p = 0.042) were lower in boosted-PI group. Contrastingly, Vascular adhesion molecules-1 (VCAM-1) (160.2 ± 80.0 vs. 147.8 ± 66.3 ng/mL, p = 0.010), and osteoprotegerin (OPG) (153.7 ± 57.1 vs. 126.4 ± 35.8, p = 0.031) were higher. After adjustment in the multivariate analysis, PI treatment is the only independent parameter associated with the changes of CRP, LOX-1, VCAM-1, and OPG. Subgroup analysis showed that ARV treatment effects differed among participant having dyslipidemia.
The major mechanism in which PI-mediated was triggering atherogenesis could be through alteration of lipid metabolism and endothelial function, but no evidence of accelerated pro-inflammatory response was attested.
人们认为,HIV 感染者心血管疾病风险增加是多种机制共同作用的结果,这改变了 HIV 治疗的格局。抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART),特别是蛋白酶抑制剂(PI),是 HIV 的常见治疗方法之一,可能与此有关。然而,PI 与其他方案相比,其作用机制尚不清楚。
本研究纳入了接受强化 PI 为基础方案治疗(强化 PI 组,N=30)或非 PI 为基础 ART 治疗(NNRTI 组,N=30)的年龄和性别匹配的 HIV 感染患者,进行了这项横断面研究。评估了评估心血管风险、炎症、内皮功能和骨代谢功能的参数。
与非 PI 组相比,强化 PI 组患者血脂异常的证据更多。两组之间亚临床动脉粥样硬化的患病率无统计学差异。强化 PI 组循环炎症标志物 C 反应蛋白(CRP)(5.4±9.1 vs. 14.9 ± 19.4 mg/L,p=0.019)和凝集素样氧化型脂蛋白受体-1(LOX-1)(387 ± 299 vs. 554 ± 324 pg/mL,p=0.042)水平较低。相反,血管细胞黏附分子-1(VCAM-1)(160.2 ± 80.0 vs. 147.8 ± 66.3 ng/mL,p=0.010)和骨保护素(OPG)(153.7 ± 57.1 vs. 126.4 ± 35.8,p=0.031)水平较高。在多元分析调整后,PI 治疗是唯一与 CRP、LOX-1、VCAM-1 和 OPG 变化相关的独立参数。亚组分析表明,ARV 治疗效果在血脂异常患者中存在差异。
PI 介导的动脉粥样硬化形成的主要机制可能是通过改变脂质代谢和内皮功能,但没有证据表明促炎反应加速。