• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用气象变量优化罗斯河病毒的预测模型

Optimising predictive modelling of Ross River virus using meteorological variables.

作者信息

Koolhof Iain S, Firestone Simon M, Bettiol Silvana, Charleston Michael, Gibney Katherine B, Neville Peter J, Jardine Andrew, Carver Scott

机构信息

College of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.

School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Mar 9;15(3):e0009252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009252. eCollection 2021 Mar.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0009252
PMID:33690616
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7978384/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Statistical models are regularly used in the forecasting and surveillance of infectious diseases to guide public health. Variable selection assists in determining factors associated with disease transmission, however, often overlooked in this process is the evaluation and suitability of the statistical model used in forecasting disease transmission and outbreaks. Here we aim to evaluate several modelling methods to optimise predictive modelling of Ross River virus (RRV) disease notifications and outbreaks in epidemiological important regions of Victoria and Western Australia.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We developed several statistical methods using meteorological and RRV surveillance data from July 2000 until June 2018 in Victoria and from July 1991 until June 2018 in Western Australia. Models were developed for 11 Local Government Areas (LGAs) in Victoria and seven LGAs in Western Australia. We found generalised additive models and generalised boosted regression models, and generalised additive models and negative binomial models to be the best fit models when predicting RRV outbreaks and notifications, respectively. No association was found with a model's ability to predict RRV notifications in LGAs with greater RRV activity, or for outbreak predictions to have a higher accuracy in LGAs with greater RRV notifications. Moreover, we assessed the use of factor analysis to generate independent variables used in predictive modelling. In the majority of LGAs, this method did not result in better model predictive performance.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We demonstrate that models which are developed and used for predicting disease notifications may not be suitable for predicting disease outbreaks, or vice versa. Furthermore, poor predictive performance in modelling disease transmissions may be the result of inappropriate model selection methods. Our findings provide approaches and methods to facilitate the selection of the best fit statistical model for predicting mosquito-borne disease notifications and outbreaks used for disease surveillance.

摘要

背景

统计模型常用于传染病的预测和监测,以指导公共卫生工作。变量选择有助于确定与疾病传播相关的因素,然而,在此过程中,用于预测疾病传播和暴发的统计模型的评估和适用性常常被忽视。在此,我们旨在评估几种建模方法,以优化对维多利亚州和西澳大利亚州重要流行病学区域的罗斯河病毒(RRV)疾病通报和疫情的预测建模。

方法/主要发现:我们利用2000年7月至2018年6月维多利亚州以及1991年7月至2018年6月西澳大利亚州的气象和RRV监测数据,开发了几种统计方法。针对维多利亚州的11个地方政府区域(LGA)和西澳大利亚州的7个LGA建立了模型。我们发现,广义相加模型和广义增强回归模型分别是预测RRV疫情和通报的最佳拟合模型。未发现模型预测RRV活动较多的LGA中RRV通报的能力,或预测RRV通报较多的LGA中疫情的准确性之间存在关联。此外,我们评估了使用因子分析来生成预测建模中使用的自变量。在大多数LGA中,这种方法并未带来更好的模型预测性能。

结论/意义:我们证明,开发用于预测疾病通报的模型可能不适用于预测疾病暴发,反之亦然。此外,在疾病传播建模中预测性能不佳可能是模型选择方法不当的结果。我们的研究结果提供了方法和途径,以促进选择最适合的统计模型来预测用于疾病监测的蚊媒疾病通报和暴发。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe06/7978384/6bd21cc8b58a/pntd.0009252.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe06/7978384/924c79da7fb5/pntd.0009252.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe06/7978384/08f2a9ded46d/pntd.0009252.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe06/7978384/1454b3f62f4b/pntd.0009252.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe06/7978384/6bd21cc8b58a/pntd.0009252.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe06/7978384/924c79da7fb5/pntd.0009252.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe06/7978384/08f2a9ded46d/pntd.0009252.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe06/7978384/1454b3f62f4b/pntd.0009252.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe06/7978384/6bd21cc8b58a/pntd.0009252.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimising predictive modelling of Ross River virus using meteorological variables.利用气象变量优化罗斯河病毒的预测模型
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Mar 9;15(3):e0009252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009252. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
The forecasting of dynamical Ross River virus outbreaks: Victoria, Australia.动力性罗斯河病毒爆发的预测:澳大利亚维多利亚州。
Epidemics. 2020 Mar;30:100377. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2019.100377. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
3
Predictive modelling of Ross River virus notifications in southeastern Australia.澳大利亚东南部罗斯河病毒通报的预测模型
Epidemiol Infect. 2017 Feb;145(3):440-450. doi: 10.1017/S0950268816002594. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
4
Predictive modelling of Ross River virus using climate data in the Darling Downs.达令唐斯地区气候数据的罗斯河病毒预测模型。
Epidemiol Infect. 2023 Mar 14;151:e55. doi: 10.1017/S0950268823000365.
5
Flooding and Arboviral Disease: Predicting Ross River Virus Disease Outbreaks Across Inland Regions of South-Eastern Australia.洪水与虫媒病毒病:预测澳大利亚东南部内陆地区的罗斯河病毒病疫情
J Med Entomol. 2020 Jan 9;57(1):241-251. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjz120.
6
Fine-temporal forecasting of outbreak probability and severity: Ross River virus in Western Australia.疫情发生概率和严重程度的精细时间预测:西澳大利亚州的罗斯河病毒
Epidemiol Infect. 2017 Oct;145(14):2949-2960. doi: 10.1017/S095026881700190X. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
7
Epidemiological models for predicting Ross River virus in Australia: A systematic review.预测澳大利亚罗斯河病毒的流行病学模型:系统评价。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Sep 24;14(9):e0008621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008621. eCollection 2020 Sep.
8
Analysis and prediction of Ross River virus transmission in New South Wales, Australia.澳大利亚新南威尔士州罗斯河病毒传播的分析与预测
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2014 Jun;14(6):422-38. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2012.1284. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
9
Predictive indicators for Ross River virus infection in the Darwin area of tropical northern Australia, using long-term mosquito trapping data.利用长期蚊虫诱捕数据预测澳大利亚北部热带地区达尔文市罗斯河病毒感染的指标
Trop Med Int Health. 2008 Jul;13(7):943-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02095.x. Epub 2008 May 13.
10
Ross River virus and Barmah Forest virus infections: a review of history, ecology, and predictive models, with implications for tropical northern Australia.罗斯河病毒和巴马森林病毒感染:历史、生态学及预测模型综述,对澳大利亚北部热带地区的影响
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008 Apr;8(2):283-97. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2007.0152.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Rapid Surveillance System for Ross River Virus in Mosquitoes Through Reverse-Transcription Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (RT-LAMP).通过逆转录环介导等温扩增技术(RT-LAMP)建立蚊虫中罗斯河病毒快速监测系统。
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2025 Feb 28;2025:1772438. doi: 10.1155/tbed/1772438. eCollection 2025.
2
Testing the intrinsic mechanisms driving the dynamics of Ross River Virus across Australia.检测驱动澳大利亚罗斯河病毒动力学的内在机制。
PLoS Pathog. 2024 Feb 15;20(2):e1011944. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011944. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Predictive modelling of Ross River virus using climate data in the Darling Downs.

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiological models for predicting Ross River virus in Australia: A systematic review.预测澳大利亚罗斯河病毒的流行病学模型:系统评价。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Sep 24;14(9):e0008621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008621. eCollection 2020 Sep.
2
The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation.马修斯相关系数(MCC)在二分类评估中优于 F1 得分和准确率的优势。
BMC Genomics. 2020 Jan 2;21(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7.
3
The forecasting of dynamical Ross River virus outbreaks: Victoria, Australia.
达令唐斯地区气候数据的罗斯河病毒预测模型。
Epidemiol Infect. 2023 Mar 14;151:e55. doi: 10.1017/S0950268823000365.
4
Prediction of Ross River virus incidence in Queensland, Australia: building and comparing models.预测澳大利亚昆士兰州罗斯河病毒的发病率:模型的建立与比较。
PeerJ. 2022 Nov 8;10:e14213. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14213. eCollection 2022.
动力性罗斯河病毒爆发的预测:澳大利亚维多利亚州。
Epidemics. 2020 Mar;30:100377. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2019.100377. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
4
An open challenge to advance probabilistic forecasting for dengue epidemics.公开挑战推进登革热疫情的概率预测。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Nov 26;116(48):24268-24274. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1909865116. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
5
Temperature explains broad patterns of Ross River virus transmission.温度解释了罗斯河病毒传播的广泛模式。
Elife. 2018 Aug 28;7:e37762. doi: 10.7554/eLife.37762.
6
Nonlinear and delayed impacts of climate on dengue risk in Barbados: A modelling study.巴巴多斯登革热风险的气候非线性和时滞影响:建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jul 17;15(7):e1002613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002613. eCollection 2018 Jul.
7
The non-human reservoirs of Ross River virus: a systematic review of the evidence.罗斯河病毒的非人类宿主:证据的系统评价。
Parasit Vectors. 2018 Mar 19;11(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2733-8.
8
Ross River Virus and the Necessity of Multiscale, Eco-epidemiological Analyses.罗斯河病毒与多尺度生态流行病学分析的必要性。
J Infect Dis. 2018 Feb 14;217(5):807-815. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix615.
9
Fine-temporal forecasting of outbreak probability and severity: Ross River virus in Western Australia.疫情发生概率和严重程度的精细时间预测:西澳大利亚州的罗斯河病毒
Epidemiol Infect. 2017 Oct;145(14):2949-2960. doi: 10.1017/S095026881700190X. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
10
Epidemic host community contribution to mosquito-borne disease transmission: Ross River virus.流行宿主群落对蚊媒疾病传播的贡献:罗斯河病毒
Epidemiol Infect. 2017 Mar;145(4):656-666. doi: 10.1017/S0950268816002739. Epub 2016 Nov 28.