Klug Emma, Chachanidze Marika, Nirappel Abraham, Chang Enchi K, Hall Nathan, Chang Ta C, Solá-Del Valle David
Massachusetts Eye and Ear, 243 Charles St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, 900 NW 17th St, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Eye (Lond). 2022 Feb;36(2):424-432. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01475-4. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: To report the initial outcomes of phacoemulsification, endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation, and dual blade ab interno trabeculectomy (PEcK), and compare them to those of phacoemulsification, endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation, and trabecular micro-bypass stent insertion (ICE-1).
SUBJECTS/METHODS: Patients from January 2018 to December 2019 that underwent PEcK or ICE-1 at a tertiary referral centre were included in this retrospective comparative case series. Patients were excluded if they had additional concomitant procedures, less than 6 weeks (42 days) of follow-up or were not at least 18 years old. Intraocular pressure (IOP), number of glaucoma medications, and best-corrected visual acuity were collected preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional-hazards regression were conducted to elucidate any factors associated with survival time.
The mean preoperative IOP was 18.3 ± 5.9 mmHg in the PEcK group (53 eyes) and 14.7 ± 4.3 mmHg in the ICE-1 group (23 eyes) (p = 0.004) on 3.3 ± 1.3 and 1.7 ± 0.93 glaucoma medications (p < 0.001), respectively. Twelve months postoperatively the mean IOP reduction was 5.1 ± 4.4 mmHg and 2.3 ± 4.0 mmHg (p = 0.08), and the mean medication reduction was 1.6 ± 1.5 and 0.97 ± 0.66 (p = 0.10), in the PEcK and ICE-1 groups, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis did not reveal any differences in treatment survival.
Both PEcK and ICE-1 provide clinically relevant reductions in IOP and glaucoma medication burden, however the PEcK procedure may confer greater reductions in IOP. The procedures did not differ with regard to Kaplan-Meier survival probability.
背景/目的:报告超声乳化白内障吸除术、内镜睫状体光凝术和双刀片内路小梁切除术(PEcK)的初步结果,并将其与超声乳化白内障吸除术、内镜睫状体光凝术和小梁微旁路支架植入术(ICE-1)的结果进行比较。
受试者/方法:本回顾性比较病例系列纳入了2018年1月至2019年12月在一家三级转诊中心接受PEcK或ICE-1手术的患者。如果患者进行了额外的联合手术、随访时间少于6周(42天)或年龄不满18岁,则将其排除。在术前以及术后6周、3个月、6个月和12个月收集眼压(IOP)、青光眼药物使用数量和最佳矫正视力。进行Kaplan-Meier生存分析和Cox比例风险回归分析以阐明与生存时间相关的任何因素。
PEcK组(53只眼)术前平均眼压为18.3±5.9 mmHg,ICE-1组(23只眼)为14.7±4.3 mmHg(p = 0.004),分别使用3.3±1.3和1.7±0.93种青光眼药物(p < 0.001)。术后12个月,PEcK组和ICE-1组的平均眼压降低分别为5.1±4.4 mmHg和2.3±4.0 mmHg(p = 0.08),平均药物使用减少分别为1.6±1.5和0.97±0.66(p = 0.10)。Kaplan-Meier生存分析未显示治疗生存方面的任何差异。
PEcK和ICE-1均可使眼压和青光眼药物负担在临床上得到显著降低,然而PEcK手术可能使眼压降低幅度更大。两种手术在Kaplan-Meier生存概率方面无差异。