Eisenhauer Nico, Buscot François, Heintz-Buschart Anna, Jurburg Stephanie D, Küsel Kirsten, Sikorski Johannes, Vogel Hans-Jörg, Guerra Carlos A
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Institute of Biology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2021 Jan;30(1):4-10. doi: 10.1111/geb.13211. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
The recent past has seen a tremendous surge in soil macroecological studies and new insights into the global drivers of one-quarter of the biodiversity of the Earth. Building on these important developments, a recent paper in outlined promising methods and approaches to advance soil macroecology. Among other recommendations, White and colleagues introduced the concept of a spatial three-dimensionality in soil macroecology by considering the different spheres of influence and scales, as soil organism size ranges vary from bacteria to macro- and megafauna. Here, we extend this concept by discussing three additional dimensions (biological, physical, and societal) that are crucial to steer soil macroecology from pattern description towards better mechanistic understanding. In our view, these are the requirements to establish it as a predictive science that can inform policy about relevant nature and management conservation actions. We highlight the need to explore temporal dynamics of soil biodiversity and functions across multiple temporal scales, integrating different facets of biodiversity (i.e., variability in body size, life-history traits, species identities, and groups of taxa) and their relationships to multiple ecosystem functions, in addition to the feedback effects between humans and soil biodiversity. We also argue that future research needs to consider effective soil conservation policy and management in combination with higher awareness of the contributions of soil-based nature's contributions to people. To verify causal relationships, soil macroecology should be paired with local and globally distributed experiments. The present paper expands the multidimensional perspective on soil macroecology to guide future research contents and funding. We recommend considering these multiple dimensions in projected global soil biodiversity monitoring initiatives.
近年来,土壤宏观生态学研究激增,人们对地球上四分之一生物多样性的全球驱动因素有了新的认识。基于这些重要进展,最近一篇论文概述了推进土壤宏观生态学的有前景的方法和途径。除其他建议外,怀特及其同事通过考虑不同的影响范围和尺度,引入了土壤宏观生态学中空间三维性的概念,因为土壤生物的大小范围从细菌到大型和巨型动物不等。在此,我们通过讨论另外三个维度(生物、物理和社会)来扩展这一概念,这三个维度对于将土壤宏观生态学从模式描述转向更好的机理理解至关重要。我们认为,这些是将其确立为一门预测科学的要求,该科学可为有关相关自然和管理保护行动的政策提供信息。我们强调需要探索土壤生物多样性和功能在多个时间尺度上的时间动态,整合生物多样性的不同方面(即体型、生活史特征、物种身份和分类群组的变异性)及其与多种生态系统功能的关系,以及人类与土壤生物多样性之间的反馈效应。我们还认为,未来的研究需要将有效的土壤保护政策和管理与更高的对土壤对人类贡献的认识结合起来。为了验证因果关系,土壤宏观生态学应与本地和全球分布的实验相结合。本文扩展了对土壤宏观生态学的多维度视角,以指导未来的研究内容和资金投入。我们建议在预计的全球土壤生物多样性监测倡议中考虑这些多个维度。