• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在对弱势群体数据的评估中纳入弱势群体

Including Vulnerable Populations in the Assessment of Data From Vulnerable Populations.

作者信息

Jackson Latifa, Kuhlman Caitlin, Jackson Fatimah, Fox P Keolu

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, College of Medicine, Howard University, Washington, DC, United States.

W. Montague Cobb Research Laboratory, College of Arts and Sciences, Howard University, Washington, DC, United States.

出版信息

Front Big Data. 2019 Jun 28;2:19. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2019.00019. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fdata.2019.00019
PMID:33693342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7931941/
Abstract

Data science has made great strides in harnessing the power of big data to improve human life across a broad spectrum of disciplines. Unfortunately this informational richesse is not equitably spread across human populations. Vulnerable populations remain both under-studied and under-consulted on the use of data derived from their communities. This lack of inclusion of vulnerable populations as data collectors, data analyzers and data beneficiaries significantly restrains the utility of big data applications that contribute to human well-ness. Here we present three case studies: (1) Describing a novel genomic dataset being developed with clinical and ethnographic insights in African Americans, (2) Demonstrating how a tutorial that enables data scientists from vulnerable populations to better understand criminal justice bias using the COMPAS dataset, and (3) investigating how Indigenous genomic diversity contributes to future biomedical interventions. These cases represent some of the outstanding challenges that big data science presents when addressing vulnerable populations as well as the innovative solutions that expanding science participation brings.

摘要

数据科学在利用大数据的力量以改善广泛学科领域的人类生活方面取得了巨大进展。不幸的是,这种信息财富并未在人群中公平分配。弱势群体在基于其社区数据的使用方面,仍然研究不足且咨询较少。在将弱势群体纳入数据收集者、数据分析者和数据受益者方面的缺失,严重限制了有助于人类健康的大数据应用的效用。在此,我们展示三个案例研究:(1)描述一个利用非裔美国人的临床和人种学见解开发的新型基因组数据集;(2)展示一个教程,该教程能使弱势群体的数据科学家利用COMPAS数据集更好地理解刑事司法偏见;(3)研究本土基因组多样性如何为未来的生物医学干预做出贡献。这些案例既代表了大数据科学在处理弱势群体问题时面临的一些突出挑战,也代表了扩大科学参与所带来的创新解决方案。

相似文献

1
Including Vulnerable Populations in the Assessment of Data From Vulnerable Populations.在对弱势群体数据的评估中纳入弱势群体
Front Big Data. 2019 Jun 28;2:19. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2019.00019. eCollection 2019.
2
3
Bridging the divide between genomic science and indigenous peoples.弥合基因组科学与原住民之间的鸿沟。
J Law Med Ethics. 2010 Fall;38(3):684-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00521.x.
4
Justice or Injustice: a History and Critique of the New York State Justice Center for the Protection of People with Special Needs.公正还是不公正:纽约州保护特殊需求人群司法中心的历史与批判
Albany Law Rev. 2017;80(3):1181-225.
5
H3Africa and the African life sciences ecosystem: building sustainable innovation.H3非洲与非洲生命科学生态系统:构建可持续创新。
OMICS. 2014 Dec;18(12):733-9. doi: 10.1089/omi.2014.0145.
6
Vulnerable populations and the transition to adulthood.弱势群体与向成年期的过渡。
Future Child. 2010 Spring;20(1):209-29. doi: 10.1353/foc.0.0047.
7
The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism.预测累犯的准确性、公正性和局限性。
Sci Adv. 2018 Jan 17;4(1):eaao5580. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao5580. eCollection 2018 Jan.
8
9
Qualitative review of promising practices for testing vulnerable populations at off-site COVID-19 testing centers.对在非现场 COVID-19 检测中心对弱势群体进行检测的有前景的实践进行定性审查。
Healthc (Amst). 2021 Mar;9(1):100519. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100519. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
10
Investigating the Use of Mobile Health Interventions in Vulnerable Populations for Cardiovascular Disease Management: Scoping Review.调查移动健康干预措施在心血管疾病管理中脆弱人群的使用情况:范围综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Oct 7;7(10):e14275. doi: 10.2196/14275.

引用本文的文献

1
Benchmark suites instead of leaderboards for evaluating AI fairness.使用基准测试套件而非排行榜来评估人工智能的公平性。
Patterns (N Y). 2024 Nov 8;5(11):101080. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2024.101080.
2
Applying an evolutionary mismatch framework to understand disease susceptibility.运用进化不匹配框架理解疾病易感性。
PLoS Biol. 2023 Sep 11;21(9):e3002311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002311. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Rethinking the frontiers of vaccine acceptance: Impact of visual messages in promoting the actual intake of COVID-19 vaccines among vulnerable populations.重新思考疫苗接种的边界:视觉信息在促进脆弱人群实际接种 COVID-19 疫苗方面的影响。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023 Dec 31;19(1):2163811. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2163811. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
4
LGBTIQ CALD People's Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Literature Review.LGBTIQ 加澳新族裔人群的亲密伴侣暴力经历:系统文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 28;19(23):15843. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315843.
5
Understanding COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Ethnic Minorities Groups in the UK.理解英国少数民族群体对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 1;10:917242. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.917242. eCollection 2022.
6
Chasing Ghosts: Race, Racism, and the Future of Microbiome Research.追逐幽灵:种族、种族主义与微生物组研究的未来
mSystems. 2021 Oct 26;6(5):e0060421. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00604-21. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
7
How understudied populations have contributed to our understanding of Alzheimer's disease genetics.被忽视的人群如何帮助我们理解阿尔茨海默病的遗传学。
Brain. 2021 May 7;144(4):1067-1081. doi: 10.1093/brain/awab028.
8
Human genetic admixture.人类基因混合。
PLoS Genet. 2021 Mar 11;17(3):e1009374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009374. eCollection 2021 Mar.
9
So many Nigerians: why is Nigeria overrepresented as the ancestral genetic homeland of Legacy African North Americans?这么多尼日利亚人:为什么 Legacy African North Americans 的祖先遗传家园会以尼日利亚人为主?
Am J Hum Genet. 2021 Jan 7;108(1):202-208. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
10
Don't blame the BAME: Ethnic and structural inequalities in susceptibilities to COVID-19.不要指责少数族裔:新冠病毒易感性方面的种族和结构性不平等
Am J Hum Biol. 2020 Sep;32(5):e23478. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23478. Epub 2020 Jul 16.

本文引用的文献

1
The Missing Diversity in Human Genetic Studies.人类遗传研究中的缺失多样性。
Cell. 2019 Mar 21;177(1):26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.048.
2
Addressing the health of vulnerable populations: social inclusion and universal health coverage.关注弱势群体的健康:社会包容与全民健康覆盖。
J Glob Health. 2018 Dec;8(2):020304. doi: 10.7189/jogh.08.020304.
3
A framework for enhancing ethical genomic research with Indigenous communities.促进与原住民社区合作的基因组学研究的伦理框架。
Nat Commun. 2018 Jul 27;9(1):2957. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05188-3.
4
Do quality improvement initiatives for diabetes care address social inequities? Secondary analysis of a systematic review.糖尿病护理的质量改进举措是否解决了社会不平等问题?一项系统评价的二次分析。
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 14;8(2):e018826. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018826.
5
Fair Prediction with Disparate Impact: A Study of Bias in Recidivism Prediction Instruments.公平预测与差异影响:累犯预测工具中的偏见研究。
Big Data. 2017 Jun;5(2):153-163. doi: 10.1089/big.2016.0047.
6
Genomic Justice for Native Americans: Impact of the Havasupai Case on Genetic Research.美国原住民的基因组正义:哈瓦苏派部落案对基因研究的影响。
Sci Technol Human Values. 2013;38(2):201-223. doi: 10.1177/0162243912470009. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
7
Genomics is failing on diversity.基因组学在多样性方面表现不佳。
Nature. 2016 Oct 13;538(7624):161-164. doi: 10.1038/538161a.
8
Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage.在不进行双链DNA切割的情况下对基因组DNA中的目标碱基进行可编程编辑。
Nature. 2016 May 19;533(7603):420-4. doi: 10.1038/nature17946. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
9
A global reference for human genetic variation.人类遗传变异的全球参考。
Nature. 2015 Oct 1;526(7571):68-74. doi: 10.1038/nature15393.
10
The inevitable application of big data to health care.大数据在医疗保健领域的必然应用。
JAMA. 2013 Apr 3;309(13):1351-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.393.