Hunter College and The Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, USA.
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2021 Mar 10;43(1):37. doi: 10.1007/s40656-021-00390-x.
There is a certain metaphor that has enjoyed tremendous longevity in the evolution of ageing literature. According to this metaphor, nature has a certain goal or purpose, the perpetuation of the species, or, alternatively, the reproductive success of the individual. In relation to this goal, the individual organism has a function, job, or task, namely, to breed and, in some species, to raise its brood to maturity. On this picture, those who cannot, or can no longer, reproduce are somehow invisible to, or even dispensable to, the evolutionary process. Here, I argue that the metaphor should be discarded, not on the grounds that it is a metaphor, but on the grounds that this particular metaphor distorts our understanding of the evolution of ageing. One reason the metaphor is problematic is that it frames senescence and death as nature's verdict on the value of older individuals. Instead, we should explore a different metaphor: the lengthy post-reproductive period in humans and some other animals is not an accident of culture, but designed by nature for the purpose of supporting and guiding younger generations. On this alternate picture, different stages of life have their own evolutionary rationales, their distinctive design features, their special mandates.
有一种隐喻在衰老研究文献的发展过程中一直存在,且经久不衰。根据这种隐喻,大自然有一个特定的目标或目的,即物种的延续,或者个体的生殖成功。相对于这个目标,个体生物有一个功能、工作或任务,即繁殖,而在某些物种中,还要将其幼崽抚养至成熟。在这种观点下,那些无法或不再繁殖的个体在进化过程中某种程度上是不可见的,甚至是可有可无的。在这里,我认为应该摒弃这种隐喻,不是因为它是一种隐喻,而是因为这种特定的隐喻扭曲了我们对衰老进化的理解。这种隐喻存在问题的一个原因是,它将衰老和死亡描述为大自然对老年个体价值的评判。相反,我们应该探索另一种隐喻:人类和其他一些动物的漫长生殖后阶段不是文化的偶然产物,而是大自然为了支持和指导年轻一代而设计的。在这种替代观点中,生命的不同阶段都有其自身的进化合理性、独特的设计特征和特殊的使命。