Suppr超能文献

耳鸣的迷走神经刺激治疗:系统评价。

Tinnitus treatment by vagus nerve stimulation: A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.

University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 11;16(3):e0247221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247221. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tinnitus is a phantom sensation of sound, which can have a negative impact on quality of life of those affected. No curative treatments are currently known. Neuromodulation by vagus nerve stimulation has emerged as a new treatment option for tinnitus, though till date the effectiveness remains unclear. Therefore, we aim to review the effect of vagus nerve stimulation on tinnitus distress and tinnitus symptom severity in patients with chronic tinnitus.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Library systematically for RCTs, observational studies and case studies on the effect of VNS treatment for tinnitus on October 29, 2019. Studies including adult patients with subjective tinnitus, comparing transcutaneous or implantable VNS to placebo or no treatment or before and after application of VNS treatment on tinnitus distress and tinnitus symptom severity measured with a validated questionnaire were eligible. The risk of bias was assessed with the appropriate tool for each type of study.

RESULTS

Our search identified 9 primary studies of which 2 RCTs, 5 cohort studies and 2 case series or reports. 5 studies used transcutaneous VNS treatment and 4 used implanted VNS treatment. 6 studies combined VNS treatment with sound therapy. There was a serious risk of bias in all studies, especially on confounding. Most studies reported a small decrease in tinnitus distress or tinnitus symptom severity.

CONCLUSION

Due to methodological limitations and low reporting quality of the included studies, the effect of VNS on tinnitus remains unclear. To draw conclusions for which patient population and to what extent (t)VNS is beneficial in the treatment of tinnitus, a randomised controlled trial should be considered.

摘要

背景

耳鸣是一种幻听感觉,会对受影响者的生活质量产生负面影响。目前尚无已知的治愈方法。迷走神经刺激作为耳鸣的一种新的治疗选择已经出现,但迄今为止,其效果仍不清楚。因此,我们旨在回顾迷走神经刺激对慢性耳鸣患者耳鸣困扰和耳鸣症状严重程度的影响。

方法

我们于 2019 年 10 月 29 日系统地在 Pubmed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆中搜索了关于 VNS 治疗耳鸣对耳鸣困扰和耳鸣症状严重程度影响的 RCTs、观察性研究和病例研究。纳入的研究包括成年主观耳鸣患者,比较经皮或植入式 VNS 与安慰剂或不治疗或 VNS 治疗前后应用于耳鸣困扰和耳鸣症状严重程度的有效性,采用经过验证的问卷进行测量。使用适当的工具评估每种类型研究的偏倚风险。

结果

我们的搜索确定了 9 项初级研究,其中包括 2 项 RCTs、5 项队列研究和 2 项病例系列或报告。5 项研究使用经皮 VNS 治疗,4 项研究使用植入式 VNS 治疗。6 项研究将 VNS 治疗与声音疗法相结合。所有研究都存在严重的偏倚风险,尤其是混杂因素。大多数研究报告耳鸣困扰或耳鸣症状严重程度略有下降。

结论

由于纳入研究的方法学限制和低报告质量,VNS 对耳鸣的疗效仍不清楚。为了得出哪种患者人群以及(t)VNS 在多大程度上有益于耳鸣的治疗,应考虑进行随机对照试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cdd/7951891/77a8d2782510/pone.0247221.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验