• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

收入相关的非正式护理不平等:来自中国健康长寿纵向调查的证据。

Income-Related Inequalities in Informal Care: Evidence From the Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey in China.

机构信息

Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, UK.

Department of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Sep 13;76(8):1691-1696. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab043.

DOI:10.1093/geronb/gbab043
PMID:33705540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8522470/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This report aims to examine income-related inequalities in informal care among older people with functional limitations in China.

METHODS

Data are drawn from the 2005, 2008, 2011, and 2014 waves of the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey. Erreygers concentration index, concentration index, and horizontal inequity index are used to examine inequalities in informal care. A random effects model is then used to investigate the relationship between household income and informal care.

RESULTS

There is no significant association between household income and the probability of receiving informal care. However, we observed a significant positive association between household income and hours of informal care received, indicating that those with higher household income receive more hours of informal care compared to those with lower household income. The degree of this inequality increases as the number of functional limitations increases.

DISCUSSION

Lower household income is associated with lower intensity of informal care received, particularly for older people with more functional limitations. Policies are required to support low-income older people with more functional limitations.

摘要

目的

本报告旨在考察中国有功能限制的老年人中,收入与非正式照料之间的不平等关系。

方法

数据来自于中国健康长寿纵向调查 2005 年、2008 年、2011 年和 2014 年的各轮调查。采用 Erreygers 集中指数、集中指数和水平不公平指数来考察非正式照料的不平等情况。然后采用随机效应模型来考察家庭收入与非正式照料之间的关系。

结果

家庭收入与接受非正式照料的概率之间没有显著关联。但是,我们观察到家庭收入与接受非正式照料的时间之间存在显著的正相关关系,表明收入较高的家庭比收入较低的家庭接受更多的非正式照料时间。这种不平等程度随着功能限制数量的增加而增加。

讨论

较低的家庭收入与接受非正式照料的强度较低有关,特别是对于功能限制较多的老年人。需要制定政策来支持有更多功能限制的低收入老年人。

相似文献

1
Income-Related Inequalities in Informal Care: Evidence From the Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey in China.收入相关的非正式护理不平等:来自中国健康长寿纵向调查的证据。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Sep 13;76(8):1691-1696. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab043.
2
The Protective Effects of Informal Care Receipt Against the Progression of Functional Limitations Among Chinese Older People.非正式护理接受对中国老年人功能限制进展的保护作用。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Apr 16;75(5):1030-1041. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gby107.
3
Does Receiving Informal Care Lead to Better Health Outcomes? Evidence From China Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey.接受非正式护理是否会导致更好的健康结果?来自中国纵向健康长寿调查的证据。
Res Aging. 2022 Aug-Sep;44(7-8):510-518. doi: 10.1177/01640275211052834. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
4
Care inequality: care received according to gender, marital status, and socioeconomic status among Korean older adults with disability.照护不平等:韩国残疾老年群体中基于性别、婚姻状况和社会经济地位的照护差异
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jul 3;18(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1008-0.
5
The relationship between formal and informal care among Chinese older adults: based on the 2014 CLHLS dataset.中国老年人正式照料与非正式照料之间的关系:基于2014年中国老年健康影响因素跟踪调查(CLHLS)数据集
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 May 22;19(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4160-8.
6
Does income matter for the policy effect of public long-term care insurance on informal care use in China? A quasi-experimental study.在中国,收入对公共长期护理保险政策对非正式护理使用的影响是否重要?一项准实验研究。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2024 Oct;29(4):248-256. doi: 10.1177/13558196241252394. Epub 2024 May 7.
7
Trajectories of informal care intensity among the oldest-old Chinese.中国最年长老人非正式照护强度的轨迹。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Dec;266:113338. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113338. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
8
Health Inequality Among the Elderly in Rural China and Influencing Factors: Evidence from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey.中国农村老年人健康不平等及其影响因素研究——基于中国健康长寿调查的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 20;16(20):4018. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16204018.
9
The availability and affordability of long-term care for disabled older people in China: The issues related to inequalities in social security benefits.中国残疾老年人长期护理服务的可及性与可负担性:与社会保障福利不平等相关的问题
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2016 Nov-Dec;67:21-7. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2016.06.018. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
10
Socioeconomic differences in informal caregiving in Europe.欧洲非正式照料中的社会经济差异。
Eur J Ageing. 2021 Dec 14;19(3):621-632. doi: 10.1007/s10433-021-00666-y. eCollection 2022 Sep.

引用本文的文献

1
Family care and predictors of the disabled elderly in China: A cross-sectional study based on the Anderson model.家庭护理与中国失能老人的预测因素:基于安德森模型的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 4;19(11):e0312002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312002. eCollection 2024.
2
Can formal home and community-based care substitute informal care? Evidence from Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey.正式的家庭和社区护理能否替代非正式护理?来自中国健康长寿纵向研究的证据。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Sep 3;24(1):730. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05312-7.
3
What determines informal care need among community-dwelling older adults in China? Results from a longitudinal study.什么因素决定了中国社区居住的老年人群体的非正式护理需求?一项纵向研究的结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jul 12;24(1):597. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04843-3.
4
The effect of urban-rural resident basic medical insurance on physical health of the rural older adult in China.城乡居民基本医疗保险对中国农村老年人口身体健康的影响。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 26;12:1319697. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1319697. eCollection 2024.
5
Life-course inequalities in intrinsic capacity and healthy ageing, China.一生中固有能力和健康老龄化的不平等,中国。
Bull World Health Organ. 2023 May 1;101(5):307-316C. doi: 10.2471/BLT.22.288888. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
6
Can Basic Medical Insurance Reduce Elderly Family Income Inequality in China?基本医疗保险能否缩小中国老年人家庭收入不平等?
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 15;10:838733. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.838733. eCollection 2022.
7
Does Receiving Informal Care Lead to Better Health Outcomes? Evidence From China Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey.接受非正式护理是否会导致更好的健康结果?来自中国纵向健康长寿调查的证据。
Res Aging. 2022 Aug-Sep;44(7-8):510-518. doi: 10.1177/01640275211052834. Epub 2021 Nov 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding Health and Social Challenges for Aging and Long-Term Care in China.了解中国老龄化和长期护理的健康和社会挑战。
Res Aging. 2021 Mar-Apr;43(3-4):127-135. doi: 10.1177/0164027520938764. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
2
The Impact of Long-Term Care Policy on the Percentage of Older Adults With Disabilities Cared for by Family Members in China: A System Dynamics Simulation.长期护理政策对中国由家庭成员照料的残疾老年人比例的影响:一项系统动力学模拟研究
Res Aging. 2021 Mar-Apr;43(3-4):147-155. doi: 10.1177/0164027520923567. Epub 2020 May 7.
3
Aging and separation from children: The health implications of adult migration for elderly parents in rural China.老龄化与与子女分离:成年子女迁移对中国农村老年父母健康的影响。
Demogr Res. 2017 Jul-Dec;37:1761-1792. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2017.37.55. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
4
Fairness and Eligibility to Long-Term Care: An Analysis of the Factors Driving Inequality and Inequity in the Use of Home Care for Older Europeans.长期护理的公平性与资格:对影响欧洲老年人家庭护理使用方面不平等和不公平的驱动因素的分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 14;14(10):1224. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101224.
5
Inequity in long-term care use and unmet need: two sides of the same coin.长期护理使用方面的不平等与未满足的需求:同一硬币的两面。
J Health Econ. 2015 Jan;39:147-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
6
Bargaining Power, Parental Caregiving, and Intergenerational Coresidence.议价能力、父母照料与代际共同居住
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2015 Nov;70(6):969-80. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbu079. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
7
China's new cooperative medical scheme and equity in access to health care: evidence from a longitudinal household survey.中国的新型农村合作医疗制度与卫生服务公平性:基于纵向家庭调查的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2013 Mar 23;12:20. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-20.
8
Correcting the concentration index.校正浓度指数。
J Health Econ. 2009 Mar;28(2):504-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.02.003. Epub 2008 Feb 16.