David P Elder Consultancy, Hertford, United Kingdom.
Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, United Kingdom.
J Pharm Sci. 2021 Jun;110(6):2311-2328. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2021.02.028. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
For decades, regulators have grappled with different approaches to address the issue of control of impurities. Safety-based limits, such as permissible daily exposure (PDE), acceptable intake (AI), threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) and less than lifetime limits (LTL) have all been used. For many years these safety-based limits have been recognized as virtually safe doses (VSDs). Recently, however, many regulatory agencies are seeking to impose limits for N-nitrosamine impurities, which are significantly below the VSD. This commentary will discuss the evolution of safety-based limits for impurities, provide an overview of the valsartan N-nitrosamine contamination issue and review the toxicology of N-nitrosamines. The outcome of a lessons-learned exercise on sartan medications undertaken by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) will also be discussed. The review will also highlight the many analytical challenges inherent with controlling impurities to ppb-based limits. The use of highly sensitive, low ppb limits, methods may lead to future issues of batch rejection, based on false positives. Regulators initially viewed the N-nitrosamine risk as being insufficient to prompt immediate product discontinuation and patients were specifically advised to continue using their affected medication. Patients were also informed that exposure to N-nitrosamines is extremely common via food and drinking water.
几十年来,监管机构一直在探索不同的方法来解决杂质控制问题。基于安全性的限制,如允许每日暴露量 (PDE)、可接受摄入量 (AI)、毒理学关注阈值 (TTC) 和低于终生限量 (LTL) 等,都曾被使用过。多年来,这些基于安全性的限制被认为是几乎无毒的剂量 (VSD)。然而,最近许多监管机构都在寻求对亚硝胺杂质施加限制,这些限制远低于 VSD。本评论将讨论杂质的基于安全性的限制的演变,概述缬沙坦亚硝胺污染问题,并回顾亚硝胺的毒理学。还将讨论欧洲药品管理局 (EMA) 对沙坦类药物进行的经验教训的结果。该评论还将强调在将杂质控制到 ppb 级限制时所固有的许多分析挑战。使用高灵敏度、低 ppb 限制的方法可能会导致未来基于假阳性结果的批次拒收问题。监管机构最初认为亚硝胺的风险不足以促使立即停止产品使用,因此特别建议患者继续使用受影响的药物。患者还被告知,通过食物和饮用水摄入亚硝胺的情况非常普遍。