Suppr超能文献

传统主义和归咎受害者。

Traditionalism and victim blaming.

机构信息

Pennsylvania State University.

California State University East Bay.

出版信息

J Soc Psychol. 2021 Jul 4;161(4):492-507. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2021.1896466. Epub 2021 Mar 11.

Abstract

A common claim is that rape victims are blamed for the crime because they have violated gender roles. We tested this idea by examining whether the relationship between traditional attitudes about gender roles and victim blaming is observed when the victim's gender role violation is not followed by rape. We also examined whether participants with traditional attitudes about casual sex were more likely to engage in victim blaming than their "liberal" counterparts. College students (Study 1: = 348; Study 2: = 239) were presented with vignettes that ended in either rape, robbery, assault, homicide, or accident, or had no outcome. Participants with traditional attitudes about gender roles did not assign more blame to victims than liberal participants unless the victim's behavior was followed by rape. In contrast, participants with traditional attitudes about casual sex were more likely to blame victims regardless of the outcome. The pattern suggests that the relationship between traditional attitudes about gender roles and victim blaming is not be due to the victim's violation of gender roles. In addition, victim blaming is due, in part, to the negative attitudes of some students to casual sex.

摘要

一种常见的说法是,强奸受害者会因为违反性别角色而受到指责。我们通过检验以下观点来验证这个说法,即当受害者的性别角色违反行为没有导致强奸时,传统性别角色观念与受害者指责之间的关系是否成立。我们还检验了对随意性行为持传统态度的参与者是否比他们的“自由派”同行更有可能进行受害者指责。大学生(研究 1:n = 348;研究 2:n = 239)阅读了以强奸、抢劫、攻击、杀人或意外结束的情境描述,或者没有结果。只有当受害者的行为伴随着强奸时,持传统性别角色观念的参与者才会比自由派参与者更多地指责受害者。相比之下,对随意性行为持传统态度的参与者无论结果如何,都更有可能指责受害者。这种模式表明,传统性别角色观念与受害者指责之间的关系并不是因为受害者违反了性别角色。此外,受害者指责部分归因于一些学生对随意性行为的负面态度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验