Suppr超能文献

不同固定系统治疗横断髌骨骨折的临床疗效比较。

Comparison of the clinical efficacy of different fixation systems for the treatment of transverse patellar fractures.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang Province, China.

Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.

出版信息

Chin J Traumatol. 2021 May;24(3):169-173. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Feb 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was designed to compare the clinical efficacy of "8" and "0" wire fixation systems combined with double-head cannulated compression screws or Kirschner wires for the treatment of transverse patellar fractures.

METHODS

From September 2011 to September 2018, patients with closed transverse patellar fractures treated with a double-head compression screw or Kirschner wire were included and analyzed retrospectively. Patients with patellar fractures combined with distal femoral fractures, tibial plateau fracture or preoperative lower limb dysfunction were excluded. The patients treated with the "8" tension band wire fixation system and Kirschner wire were taken as Group A; those treated with the "0" fixation system and Kirschner wire were taken as Group B; those treated with the "8" fixation system and double-head cannulated compression screw were taken as group C; and those treated with the "0" fixation system and double-head cannulated compression screw were taken as group D. Six weeks and one year after the operation and every month from the third month after the operation until the fractures healed, an X-ray examination was performed to identify fracture healing. The time of fracture healing and postoperative complications of the four groups were compared. One year after the operation, knee function was evaluated by Bostman's score.

RESULTS

During the study period, 168 patients with patellar fractures were treated by operations, and 88 patients were excluded because the fracture type did not meet the requirements or because there were combined fractures of the distal femur or tibial plateau. As a result, 80 patients were included in this study, 20 in each group. All the patients were followed up for an average period of 12.2 months. Compared with Group A, patients in Group D presented less postoperative discomfort in the prepatellar region, quicker fracture healing, less fixation failure and better postoperative knee function scores (all p < 0.05). The incidence of internal fixation failure in Group (B+D) was lower than that in Group (A+C) (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The "0" wire fixation system combined with a double-head cannulated compression screw seems to be more beneficial than the other three fixation systems for the treatment of transverse patellar fractures.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较“8”字和“0”字钢丝固定系统联合双头加压空心螺钉或克氏针治疗横断型髌骨骨折的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析 2011 年 9 月至 2018 年 9 月采用双头加压空心螺钉或克氏针治疗的闭合性横断型髌骨骨折患者资料,排除合并股骨远端骨折、胫骨平台骨折或术前下肢功能障碍的患者。采用“8”字张力带钢丝固定联合克氏针治疗的患者纳入 A 组,采用“0”字固定系统联合克氏针治疗的患者纳入 B 组,采用“8”字固定系统联合双头加压空心螺钉治疗的患者纳入 C 组,采用“0”字固定系统联合双头加压空心螺钉治疗的患者纳入 D 组。术后 6 周及 1 年,以及术后第 3 个月开始每月复查 X 线片,观察骨折愈合情况。比较四组患者的骨折愈合时间及术后并发症发生情况。术后 1 年采用 Bostman 评分评估膝关节功能。

结果

研究期间共 168 例髌骨骨折患者接受手术治疗,88 例因骨折类型不符合要求或合并股骨远端或胫骨平台骨折而排除。最终纳入 80 例患者,每组 20 例。所有患者平均随访 12.2 个月。与 A 组比较,D 组患者髌前区术后不适感较轻,骨折愈合较快,固定失败发生率较低,膝关节功能评分较高(均 P<0.05)。B 组+D 组内固定失败发生率低于 A 组+C 组(P>0.05)。

结论

“0”字钢丝固定系统联合双头加压空心螺钉治疗横断型髌骨骨折的效果优于其他三种固定系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c88e/8173576/96d7b0575a7a/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验