• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神病性障碍患者的个人康复:相关因素的系统评价与荟萃分析

Personal Recovery in People With a Psychotic Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Associated Factors.

作者信息

Leendertse J C P, Wierdsma A I, van den Berg D, Ruissen A M, Slade M, Castelein S, Mulder C L

机构信息

Emergis Institute for Mental Healthcare, Kloetinge, Netherlands.

Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 23;12:622628. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.622628. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.622628
PMID:33708145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7940758/
Abstract

Personal recovery (PR) is a subjective, multidimensional concept, and quantitative research using PR as an outcome is rapidly increasing. This systematic review is intended to support the design of interventions that contribute to PR in psychotic disorders, by providing an overview of associated factors and their weighted importance to PR: clinical factors, social factors, and socio-demographic characteristics are included, and factors related to the concept of PR (organized into CHIME dimensions). A systematic literature search was conducted from inception to March 2020. Quantitative studies that had used a validated questionnaire assessing the concept of PR were included. Mean effect sizes for the relationship between PR-scale total scores and related factors were calculated using meta-analyses. Sources of heterogeneity were examined using meta-regression tests. Forty-six studies, that used (a total of) eight PR measures, showed that in clinical factors, affective symptoms had a medium negative association with PR-scale total scores ( = -0.44, 95%CI -0.50 to -0.37), while positive, negative and general symptoms had small negative correlations. No association was found with neuro-cognition. Social factors (support, work and housing, and functioning) showed small positive correlations. Gender and age differences had barely been researched. Large associations were found for PR-scale total scores with the CHIME dimensions hope ( = 0.56, 95%CI 0.48-0.63), meaning in life ( = 0.48, 95%CI 0.38-0.58) and empowerment ( = 0.53, 95%CI 0.42-0.63); while medium associations were found with connectedness ( = 0.34, 95%CI 0.43-0.65) and identity ( = 0.43, 95%CI 0.35-0.50). Levels of heterogeneity were high, sources included: the variety of PR measures, variations in sample characteristics, publication bias, variations in outcome measures, and cultural differences. Most interventions in mental healthcare aim to reduce symptoms and improve functioning. With regard to stimulating PR, these interventions may benefit from also focusing on enhancing hope, empowerment, and meaning in life. The strength of these findings is limited by the challenges of comparing separate CHIME dimensions with questionnaires assessing the concept of PR, and by the high levels of heterogeneity observed. Future research should focus on the interaction between elements of PR and clinical and social factors over time.

摘要

个人康复(PR)是一个主观的、多维度的概念,将PR作为结果的定量研究正在迅速增加。本系统综述旨在通过概述相关因素及其对PR的加权重要性来支持有助于精神障碍患者实现PR的干预措施的设计:包括临床因素、社会因素和社会人口学特征,以及与PR概念相关的因素(分为CHIME维度)。从开始到2020年3月进行了系统的文献检索。纳入了使用经过验证的问卷评估PR概念的定量研究。使用荟萃分析计算PR量表总分与相关因素之间关系的平均效应量。使用元回归检验检查异质性来源。46项研究(共使用了8种PR测量方法)表明,在临床因素方面,情感症状与PR量表总分呈中度负相关(=-0.44,95%CI -0.50至-0.37),而阳性、阴性和一般症状呈小负相关。未发现与神经认知有关联。社会因素(支持、工作和住房以及功能)呈小正相关。性别和年龄差异几乎未被研究。发现PR量表总分与CHIME维度希望(=0.56,95%CI 0.48-0.63)、生活意义(=0.48,95%CI 0.38-0.58)和赋权(=0.53,95%CI 0.42-0.63)有较大关联;而与联系感(=0.34,95%CI 0.43-0.65)和身份认同(=0.43,95%CI 0.35-0.50)有中度关联。异质性水平较高,来源包括:PR测量方法的多样性、样本特征的差异、发表偏倚、结果测量的差异以及文化差异。大多数精神卫生保健干预措施旨在减轻症状和改善功能。关于促进PR,这些干预措施可能还应侧重于增强希望、赋权和生活意义,从而从中受益。这些研究结果的力度受到将CHIME各个维度与评估PR概念的问卷进行比较的挑战以及所观察到的高度异质性的限制。未来的研究应关注PR要素与临床和社会因素随时间的相互作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0536/7940758/ff34974b3765/fpsyt-12-622628-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0536/7940758/ff34974b3765/fpsyt-12-622628-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0536/7940758/ff34974b3765/fpsyt-12-622628-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Personal Recovery in People With a Psychotic Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Associated Factors.精神病性障碍患者的个人康复:相关因素的系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 23;12:622628. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.622628. eCollection 2021.
2
An Asian study on clinical and psychological factors associated with personal recovery in people with psychosis.亚洲一项关于与精神病患者个人康复相关的临床和心理因素的研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2238-9.
3
Using the CHIME Personal Recovery Framework to Evaluate the Validity of the MHRM-10 in Individuals with Psychosis.使用 CHIME 个人康复框架评估 MHRM-10 在精神病患者中的有效性。
Psychiatr Q. 2020 Sep;91(3):793-805. doi: 10.1007/s11126-020-09737-2.
4
The Relationship Between Clinical and Personal Recovery in Patients With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.精神分裂谱系障碍患者的临床康复与个人康复之间的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Schizophr Bull. 2018 Apr 6;44(3):631-642. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbx088.
5
Personal recovery in bipolar disorder: Systematic review and "best fit" framework synthesis of qualitative evidence - a POETIC adaptation of CHIME.双相情感障碍中的个人康复:定性证据的系统评价和“最佳契合”框架综合 - CHIME 的 POETIC 改编。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Sep 1;292:375-385. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.05.051. Epub 2021 May 28.
6
Randomised controlled trial of a digitally assisted low intensity intervention to promote personal recovery in persisting psychosis: SMART-Therapy study protocol.一项关于数字辅助低强度干预促进持续性精神病患者个人康复的随机对照试验:SMART-疗法研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Sep 7;16(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1024-1.
7
Understanding the experiences of hikikomori through the lens of the CHIME framework: connectedness, hope and optimism, identity, meaning in life, and empowerment; systematic review.从 CHIME 框架的角度理解蛰居族的经历:联系、希望和乐观、身份认同、生活意义和赋权;系统评价。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Jul 10;9(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00605-7.
8
Measuring personal recovery in people with a psychotic disorder based on CHIME: A comparison of three validated measures.基于CHIME对精神病性障碍患者的个人康复情况进行测量:三种有效测量方法的比较。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Oct;29(5):808-819. doi: 10.1111/inm.12711. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
9
Conceptualizations, assessments, and implications of personal recovery in mental illness: A scoping review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.精神疾病中个人康复的概念化、评估和意义:系统评价和荟萃分析的范围综述。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2019 Jun;42(2):169-181. doi: 10.1037/prj0000356. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
10
A framework to conceptualize personal recovery from eating disorders: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of perspectives from individuals with lived experience.从有过患病经历的个体角度出发来构建进食障碍康复理念的框架:系统综述与定性元综合分析。
Int J Eat Disord. 2020 Aug;53(8):1188-1203. doi: 10.1002/eat.23260. Epub 2020 Mar 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The roles of stress, illness management, and goal setting on the association between personal and clinical recovery - a prospective study.压力、疾病管理和目标设定在个人康复与临床康复关联中的作用——一项前瞻性研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Sep 2;25(1):848. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07291-4.
2
Intervention Strategies for Promoting Occupational Participation in Early Mental Health Occupational Therapy in Japan: Focus Group Discussions With Occupational Therapists.促进日本早期心理健康职业治疗中职业参与的干预策略:与职业治疗师的焦点小组讨论
Cureus. 2025 Jun 9;17(6):e85600. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85600. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Peer Support in Mental Health: Literature Review.心理健康中的同伴支持:文献综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Jun 9;7(6):e15572. doi: 10.2196/15572.
2
What Constitutes Sufficient Evidence for Case Formulation-Driven CBT for Psychosis? Cumulative Meta-analysis of the Effect on Hallucinations and Delusions.什么构成了针对精神病的个案概念化驱动认知行为疗法的充分证据?对幻觉和妄想影响的累积荟萃分析。
Schizophr Bull. 2020 Sep 21;46(5):1072-1085. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa045.
3
Measuring personal recovery in people with a psychotic disorder based on CHIME: A comparison of three validated measures.
Enhancing social cognition in psychosis - the potential role of open dialogue.
增强精神病患者的社会认知——开放对话的潜在作用。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2025 Jun 5;11(1):84. doi: 10.1038/s41537-025-00608-y.
4
The Association between Self-Reported Self-Disturbance Phenomena and Personal Recovery in Patients with a Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder, Siblings and Controls.精神分裂症谱系障碍患者、其兄弟姐妹及对照组中自我报告的自我干扰现象与个人康复之间的关联
Psychopathology. 2025 May 28:1-22. doi: 10.1159/000546557.
5
An exploratory study on the relationship between personal recovery and social functioning in outpatients with schizophrenia.一项关于精神分裂症门诊患者个人康复与社会功能之间关系的探索性研究。
Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2025 May 15:15691861251333089. doi: 10.1177/15691861251333089.
6
The relationships among activity information, personal recovery, and related psychosocial factors in psychiatric day-care users in Japan.日本精神科日间护理使用者的活动信息、个人康复及相关社会心理因素之间的关系。
Br J Occup Ther. 2024 Feb;87(2):114-124. doi: 10.1177/03080226231198343. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
7
"Why shouldn't I expect a lot from life?" - a qualitative study of what facilitates long-term recovery in first-episode psychosis.“为何我不应对生活抱有诸多期待?”——一项关于促进首发精神病长期康复因素的定性研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 28;25(1):423. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06681-y.
8
Mediators of functioning and quality of life among people living with schizophrenia participating in the culturally adapted family psychoeducation (KUPAA) trial in Tanzania.参与坦桑尼亚文化适应性家庭心理教育(KUPAA)试验的精神分裂症患者功能和生活质量的调节因素
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Apr 4. doi: 10.1007/s00127-025-02896-2.
9
Interrelationships of Changes in Outcome Domains in Patients With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: A Meta-Analysis.精神分裂症谱系障碍患者结局领域变化的相互关系:一项荟萃分析。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2025 Mar 30;152(1):6-26. doi: 10.1111/acps.13808.
10
Bibliotherapy and Schizophrenia: A Stanghellinian Perspective.阅读疗法与精神分裂症:斯坦盖利尼视角
Psychopathology. 2025 Mar 25:1-11. doi: 10.1159/000545471.
基于CHIME对精神病性障碍患者的个人康复情况进行测量:三种有效测量方法的比较。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Oct;29(5):808-819. doi: 10.1111/inm.12711. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
4
"The Italian Study on Recovery 2" Phase 1: Psychometric Properties of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS), Italian Validation of the Recovery Assessment Scale.“意大利康复研究2” 第一阶段:康复评估量表(RAS)的心理测量特性,康复评估量表的意大利语验证
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 5;10:1000. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.01000. eCollection 2019.
5
How do recovery-oriented interventions contribute to personal mental health recovery? A systematic review and logic model.以康复为导向的干预措施如何促进个人心理健康的恢复?一项系统综述与逻辑模型。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2020 Mar;76:101815. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101815. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
6
Assessing metacognitive and help-seeking strategies in schizophrenia: design and psychometric validation of the Versailles Metacognitive Strategies Evaluation Questionnaire.评估精神分裂症的元认知和寻求帮助策略:凡尔赛元认知策略评估问卷的设计和心理计量学验证。
Clin Rehabil. 2020 Feb;34(2):263-275. doi: 10.1177/0269215519888784. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
7
Influences on functional outcome and subjective recovery in individuals with and without First Episode Psychosis: A metacognitive model.首发精神病患者与非首发精神病患者的功能结局和主观恢复的影响:元认知模型。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Feb;284:112643. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112643. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
8
Contact with recovered peers: buffering disempowering service experiences and promoting personal recovery in serious mental illness.与康复同伴接触:缓冲丧失权力的服务体验并促进严重精神疾病患者的个人康复
BJPsych Open. 2019 Nov 8;5(6):e98. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2019.72.
9
The Factors Affecting the Relationship between Remission Status and Employment in Chronic Schizophrenia Patients.影响慢性精神分裂症患者缓解状态与就业关系的因素
Psychiatry Investig. 2019 Nov;16(11):860-867. doi: 10.30773/pi.2019.0087. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
10
Clinical and demographic correlates of stigma in first-episode psychosis: the impact of duration of untreated psychosis.首发精神病患者污名的临床和人口统计学相关性:未治疗精神病持续时间的影响。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020 Feb;141(2):157-166. doi: 10.1111/acps.13102. Epub 2019 Oct 11.