Chapin John, Stern Alexey
Pennsylvania State University, 100 University Drive, Monaca, PA 15001 USA.
J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2019 Sep 6;14(1):85-91. doi: 10.1007/s40653-019-00287-9. eCollection 2021 Mar.
Findings from a survey of children and adolescents ( = 645) documents that students witness and experience a range of abuse at home and at school. Participants freely acknowledged pushing or shoving (46%) and slapping or hitting peers (40%). The study contributes to the literature by focusing on upstanding (active versus passive bystander intervention) and parenting styles. Findings reveal an interesting disconnect between those who say they will intervene when confronted by friends' or peers' bullying behaviors and those who actually have intervened. Children and adolescents with authoritarian parents are more likely to say they would intervene to help peers, but when asked if they actually have done so, they are the least likely to follow-through. In contrast, children with authoritative or permissive parents show the opposite pattern: No significant difference in their intent to intervene, but they are more likely to become upstanders, rather than passive bystanders when actually confronted with bullying behavior.
一项针对645名儿童和青少年的调查结果表明,学生们在家中和学校目睹并经历了一系列虐待行为。参与者自由承认有推搡行为(46%)以及掌掴或殴打同龄人行为(40%)。该研究通过关注挺身而出(主动与被动旁观者干预)和养育方式,为相关文献做出了贡献。研究结果揭示了那些表示在面对朋友或同龄人的欺凌行为时会进行干预的人与实际进行干预的人之间存在有趣的脱节。有专制型父母的儿童和青少年更有可能表示他们会干预以帮助同龄人,但当被问及他们是否真的这样做过时,他们实际采取行动的可能性最小。相比之下,有权威型或放任型父母的儿童则呈现出相反的模式:他们干预的意愿没有显著差异,但当实际面对欺凌行为时,他们更有可能成为挺身而出者,而不是被动旁观者。