Nutrition and Wellness Research Center, Department of Kinesiology, Iowa State University, Suite 6100, 2325 North Loop Drive, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012 Apr;9(4):1411-26. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9041411. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
Parenting behaviors are known to have a major impact on childhood obesity but it has proven difficult to isolate the specific mechanism of influence. The present study uses Baumrind's parenting typologies (authoritative, authoritarian, and permissive) to examine associations between parenting styles and parenting practices associated with childhood obesity. Data were collected from a diverse sample of children (n = 182, ages 7-10) in an urban school district in the United States. Parenting behaviors were assessed with the Parenting Styles and Dimension Questionnaire (PSDQ), a 58-item survey that categorizes parenting practices into three styles: authoritative, authoritarian, and permissive. Parent perceptions of the home obesogenic environment were assessed with the Family Nutrition and Physical Activity (FNPA) instrument, a simple 10 item instrument that has been shown in previous research to predict risk for overweight. Cluster analyses were used to identify patterns in the PSDQ data and these clusters were related to FNPA scores and measured BMI values in children (using ANCOVA analyses that controlled for parent income and education) to examine the impact of parenting styles on risk of overweight/obesity. The FNPA score was positively (and significantly) associated with scores on the authoritative parenting scale (r = 0.29) but negatively (and significantly) associated with scores on the authoritarian scale (r = -0.22) and permissive scale (r = -0.20). Permissive parenting was significantly associated with BMIz score but this is the only dimension that exhibited a relationship with BMI. A three-cluster solution explained 40.5% of the total variance and clusters were distinguishable by low and high z-scores on different PSDQ sub-dimensions. A cluster characterized as Permissive/Authoritarian (Cluster 2) had significantly lower FNPA scores (more obesogenic) than clusters characterized as Authoritative (Cluster 1) or Authoritarian/Authoritative (Cluster 3) after controlling for family income and parent education. No direct effects of cluster were evident on the BMI outcomes but the patterns were consistent with the FNPA outcomes. The results suggest that a permissive parenting style is associated with more obesogenic environments while an authoritative parenting style is associated with less obesogenic environments.
父母教养行为对儿童肥胖有重大影响,但要确定其具体影响机制却颇具难度。本研究使用 Baumrind 的教养类型(权威型、专制型和放任型)来检验与儿童肥胖相关的教养风格和教养实践之间的关联。数据来自美国一个城市学区的多样化儿童样本(n=182,年龄 7-10 岁)。使用父母教养方式和维度问卷(PSDQ)评估父母教养行为,该问卷是一个 58 项的调查,将教养实践分为三种风格:权威型、专制型和放任型。使用家庭营养和体育活动(FNPA)工具评估父母对家庭致肥胖环境的感知,该工具是一个简单的 10 项工具,在先前的研究中已表明可预测超重风险。聚类分析用于识别 PSDQ 数据中的模式,这些聚类与 FNPA 评分和儿童的 BMI 值相关(使用 ANCOVA 分析,控制父母收入和教育),以检验教养风格对超重/肥胖风险的影响。FNPA 评分与权威型教养量表得分呈正相关(且显著相关)(r=0.29),与专制型量表得分(r=-0.22)和放任型量表得分(r=-0.20)呈负相关(且显著相关)。放任型教养与 BMIz 评分显著相关,但这是唯一与 BMI 相关的维度。三聚类解决方案解释了总方差的 40.5%,聚类可以通过不同 PSDQ 子维度上的高低 z 分数来区分。一个被描述为放任/专制的聚类(聚类 2)在控制家庭收入和父母教育后,FNPA 评分明显较低(更易致肥胖),比被描述为权威的聚类(聚类 1)或专制/权威的聚类(聚类 3)低。聚类对 BMI 结果没有直接影响,但模式与 FNPA 结果一致。结果表明,放任型教养方式与更易致肥胖的环境相关,而权威型教养方式与不易致肥胖的环境相关。