Li Yi, Zheng Shuai, Zhang Jinghan, Wang Fumin, Liu Xinyao, He Wen
Department of Ultrasound, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2021 Feb;11(1):28-38. doi: 10.21037/cdt-20-876.
Advanced carotid ultrasound techniques may be useful in characterizing plaque vulnerability, but comprehensive studies are still lacking. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with vulnerable plaques using advanced ultrasound techniques.
This is a prospective observational study of patients with >50% internal carotid stenosis (ICA). All patients underwent conventional ultrasound, superb microvascular imaging (SMI) and shear wave elastography (SWE) examinations. Plaque size, echogenicity, stiffness and intraplaque neovascularization (IPN) were assessed and compared between symptomatic and asymptomatic groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of SWE and SMI of the vulnerable plaques.
The final analysis included 123 patients (78.9% male; mean age, 66±8 years), 65 were enrolled in the symptomatic group, and 58 were enrolled in the asymptomatic group. The mean elasticity was 78.1±25.4 kPa for asymptomatic and 51.5±18.3 kPa for symptomatic plaques. Symptomatic plaques showed higher visual IPN grades on SMI than asymptomatic plaques (P<0.001). Multivariate regression analysis showed that plaque stiffness (PS) (OR 0.95, 95% CI, 0.919-0.974) and IPN level (OR 4.17, 95% CI, 2.008-8.664) were independently associated with symptomatic plaques. The combination of the two factors had a preferable accuracy to discriminate symptomatic plaques (AUC 0.89, 95% CI, 0.827-0.944).
Advanced carotid ultrasound techniques can identify plaque characteristics that are associated with ischemic events and may be potentially indicative of plaque vulnerability. These factors may ultimately be used in the clinical management of carotid stenosis.
先进的颈动脉超声技术可能有助于表征斑块易损性,但仍缺乏全面的研究。本研究的目的是使用先进的超声技术识别与易损斑块相关的因素。
这是一项对颈内动脉狭窄(ICA)超过50%的患者进行的前瞻性观察研究。所有患者均接受了传统超声、超微血管成像(SMI)和剪切波弹性成像(SWE)检查。评估并比较了有症状组和无症状组之间的斑块大小、回声性、硬度和斑块内新生血管形成(IPN)情况。采用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线评估SWE和SMI对易损斑块的诊断性能。
最终分析纳入123例患者(男性占78.9%;平均年龄66±8岁),其中65例纳入有症状组,58例纳入无症状组。无症状斑块的平均弹性为78.1±25.4 kPa,有症状斑块的平均弹性为51.5±18.3 kPa。有症状斑块在SMI上显示出比无症状斑块更高的视觉IPN分级(P<0.001)。多变量回归分析显示,斑块硬度(PS)(比值比0.95,95%置信区间,0.919 - 0.974)和IPN水平(比值比4.17,95%置信区间,2.008 - 8.664)与有症状斑块独立相关。这两个因素的组合在鉴别有症状斑块方面具有较好的准确性(曲线下面积0.89,95%置信区间,0.827 - 0.944)。
先进的颈动脉超声技术能够识别与缺血事件相关的斑块特征,并且可能潜在地指示斑块易损性。这些因素最终可能用于颈动脉狭窄的临床管理。