Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Clin Drug Investig. 2021 Apr;41(4):341-351. doi: 10.1007/s40261-021-01016-7. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) or dialysis patients are lacking. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of DOACs and warfarin in patients with CKD requiring anticoagulation therapy.
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials and 19 observational studies, with the inclusion criteria being a comparative study between DOACs and warfarin in patients with CKD or dialysis patients from database inception until August 2020. The efficacy outcomes were stroke, systemic embolism (SE), or venous thromboembolism (VTE), and the safety outcome was major bleeding.
Compared with warfarin, DOACs significantly reduced the risk of stroke/SE/VTE by 22% (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-0.95) and major bleeding by 17% (HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.71-0.97). On comparing factor Xa inhibitors and dabigatran with warfarin separately, factor Xa inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of stroke/SE/VTE (HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.98) and major bleeding (HR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.91) overall in patients. Comparing each DOACs with warfarin separately, apixaban was associated with a significantly better risk reduction of stroke/SE/VTE (25% risk reduction) and major bleeding (35% risk reduction) than warfarin. Compared with warfarin, DOACs significantly reduced the risk of stroke, SE, or VTE by 19% (HR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.97) in patients with CKD stage 3 and significantly lowered the risk of major bleeding by 31% (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.56-0.85) in patients with CKD stages 4-5.
In pooled, analyzed randomized controlled trials and observational studies, DOACs were associated with better efficacy in early CKD, as well as similar efficacy and safety outcomes to warfarin in patients with CKD stages 4-5 or dialysis patients. The results of patients with CKD stages 4-5 and dialysis patients were from observational studies. Well-designed randomized controlled trials focused on DOAC use in patients with CKD and dialysis patients are needed. PROSPERO register number: CRD42020150599, 6 February, 2020.
缺乏关于慢性肾脏病(CKD)或透析患者直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)的系统评价和荟萃分析。我们旨在比较 DOAC 和华法林在需要抗凝治疗的 CKD 患者中的疗效和安全性。
我们对六项随机对照试验和十九项观察性研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,纳入标准为自数据库建立至 2020 年 8 月,比较 DOAC 和华法林在 CKD 或透析患者中的疗效。主要疗效终点为卒中、全身性栓塞(SE)或静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE),主要安全性终点为大出血。
与华法林相比,DOAC 可显著降低卒中/SE/VTE 风险 22%(风险比[HR] = 0.78,95%置信区间[CI] 0.64-0.95)和大出血风险 17%(HR = 0.83,95%CI 0.71-0.97)。分别比较 Xa 因子抑制剂和达比加群与华法林时,Xa 因子抑制剂可显著降低卒中/SE/VTE(HR = 0.78,95%CI 0.62-0.98)和大出血(HR = 0.76,95%CI 0.64-0.91)风险。分别比较每种 DOAC 与华法林时,阿哌沙班与华法林相比,卒中/SE/VTE 和大出血风险降低 25%(风险降低 35%)。与华法林相比,DOAC 可使 CKD 3 期患者的卒中、SE 或 VTE 风险降低 19%(HR = 0.81,95%CI 0.68-0.97),并使 CKD 4-5 期患者的大出血风险降低 31%(HR = 0.69,95%CI 0.56-0.85)。
在汇总的分析性随机对照试验和观察性研究中,DOAC 在早期 CKD 中具有更好的疗效,并且在 CKD 4-5 期或透析患者中与华法林具有相似的疗效和安全性。CKD 4-5 期和透析患者的结果来自观察性研究。需要设计良好的针对 CKD 患者和透析患者的 DOAC 使用的随机对照试验。PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42020150599,2020 年 2 月 6 日。