Suppr超能文献

超声引导下Ⅱ型胸神经阻滞与菱形肌间阻滞在乳腺癌术后镇痛效果的比较:一项随机对照试验。

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Type-II Pectoral Nerve Block and Rhomboid Intercostal Block for Pain Management Following Breast Cancer Surgery: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Anesthesiology, Bursa State Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.

出版信息

Pain Pract. 2021 Jul;21(6):638-645. doi: 10.1111/papr.13004. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Although breast-conserving surgery-axillary dissection (BCS-AD) is a minimally invasive surgery, patients may suffer from moderate-to-severe pain. Several regional techniques can be used for pain control. The type II pectoral nerve block (PECS II) and the rhomboid intercostal block (RIB) are interfascial plane blocks that have been reported to provide effective analgesia after breast surgery. This study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of the PECS II block and the RIB after breast surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety female patients aged 18 to 65 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classes I and II physical status who underwent unilateral BCS-AD surgery were included. Patients were divided into three groups (n = 30 in each): the PECS II group, the RIB group, or the control group. PECS II block and RIB were performed with 30 mL 0.25% bupivacaine. Ibuprofen 400 mg IV 3 × 1 was given in the postoperative period. A patient control analgesia device included a dose of 10 µg/mL fentanyl, which was prepared and connected to the patients.

RESULTS

There were no statistical differences between groups in terms of demographical data. Postoperative fentanyl consumption was significantly lower in the PECS II and RIB groups than the control group. The need for rescue analgesia use was significantly higher in the control group than the other groups. At all times, visual analog scale scores were significantly lower in the PECS II and RIB groups than the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The PECS II block and the RIB provide similar effective analgesia after BCS-AD.

摘要

目的

尽管保乳手术-腋窝解剖(BCS-AD)是一种微创手术,但患者可能会遭受中重度疼痛。有几种区域技术可用于控制疼痛。II 型胸大肌神经阻滞(PECS II)和菱形肋间阻滞(RIB)是筋膜平面阻滞,据报道在乳房手术后能提供有效的镇痛。本研究旨在比较乳房手术后 PECS II 阻滞和 RIB 的镇痛效果。

患者和方法

90 例年龄在 18 至 65 岁之间的美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)I 级和 II 级身体状况的女性患者,接受单侧 BCS-AD 手术,纳入本研究。患者分为三组(每组 30 例):PECS II 组、RIB 组或对照组。在 PECS II 阻滞和 RIB 中使用 30ml0.25%布比卡因。术后给予布洛芬 400mg IV 3×1。患者自控镇痛设备包含 10μg/ml 芬太尼,准备好并连接到患者身上。

结果

三组患者在人口统计学数据方面无统计学差异。与对照组相比,PECS II 组和 RIB 组术后芬太尼消耗明显减少。与其他两组相比,对照组需要使用解救性镇痛的比例明显更高。在所有时间点,PECS II 组和 RIB 组的视觉模拟评分均明显低于对照组。

结论

PECS II 阻滞和 RIB 在 BCS-AD 后提供相似的有效镇痛。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验