• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期价格协议对罕见病药物价格的影响。

The impact of early phase price agreements on prices of orphan drugs.

作者信息

Nuijten Mark, Van Wilder Philippe

机构信息

A2M, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Ecole de Santé Publique, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 12;21(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06208-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-021-06208-7
PMID:33711994
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7953706/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Innovative orphan drugs often have an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) which is higher than the maximum threshold for reimbursement. Payers have limited budgets and often cannot pay the full price of a new product, but pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies require a minimum price to satisfy their investors. The objective of this study was to present a possible solution to bridge this pricing gap by having early phase price agreements, which reduce the risk for investors.

METHODS

We used a Pricing Model, which determines the minimum (break-even) price of an innovative drug from an investor's perspective. This model is based on economic valuation theory, which uses the expected free cash flows and the required cost of capital. We selected two orphan drugs with a positive clinical assessment and an ICER higsher than the Dutch maximum threshold of €80,000 per QALY gained to use as examples in the model: Spinraza for spinal muscular atrophy and Orkambi for cystic fibrosis.

RESULTS

The results show that early pricing agreements before phase III trials can substantially lower the drug price resulting from a lower cost of capital. The minimum price for orphan drugs can be reduced by 27.4%, when cost of capital decreases from 12 to 9%. An additional adjustment of other critical parameters due to early pricing agreements (lower probabilities of phase III failure and lower research and development (R&D) costs) can further reduce the minimal price by 62.8%.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that earlier timing of price negotiations resulting in an agreement on drug price can substantially lower the minimal price of orphan drugs for the investor.

摘要

背景

创新型孤儿药的增量成本效益比(ICER)往往高于报销的最高阈值。支付方预算有限,通常无法支付新产品的全部价格,但制药和生物技术公司需要最低价格来满足其投资者。本研究的目的是提出一个可能的解决方案,即通过达成早期阶段价格协议来弥合这一定价差距,从而降低投资者的风险。

方法

我们使用了一种定价模型,该模型从投资者的角度确定创新药物的最低(盈亏平衡)价格。此模型基于经济估值理论,该理论使用预期自由现金流和所需资本成本。我们选择了两种临床评估为阳性且ICER高于荷兰每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)80,000欧元最高阈值的孤儿药作为模型示例:用于脊髓性肌萎缩症的Spinraza和用于囊性纤维化的Orkambi。

结果

结果表明,在III期试验前达成早期定价协议可因资本成本降低而大幅降低药品价格。当资本成本从12%降至9%时,孤儿药的最低价格可降低27.4%。由于早期定价协议(III期失败概率降低和研发成本降低)对其他关键参数的额外调整可进一步将最低价格降低62.8%。

结论

本研究表明,提前进行价格谈判并就药品价格达成协议可大幅降低投资者的孤儿药最低价格。

相似文献

1
The impact of early phase price agreements on prices of orphan drugs.早期价格协议对罕见病药物价格的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 12;21(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06208-7.
2
An integrated valuation model for payer and investor.一种针对付款方和投资者的综合估值模型。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2022 May 29;10(1):2080631. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2022.2080631. eCollection 2022.
3
Pricing and reimbursement of orphan drugs: the need for more transparency.孤儿药的定价和报销:需要提高透明度。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011 Jun 17;6:42. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-6-42.
4
Determinants of price negotiations for new drugs. The experience of the Italian Medicines Agency.新药价格谈判的决定因素。意大利药品管理局的经验。
Health Policy. 2019 Jun;123(6):595-600. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
5
Economic evaluation of orphan drug Lutetium-Octreotate vs. Octreotide long-acting release for patients with an advanced midgut neuroendocrine tumour in the Netherlands.荷兰一种用于治疗晚期中肠神经内分泌肿瘤的孤儿药镥[177Lu]奥曲肽对比奥曲肽长效释放制剂的经济性评价。
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Aug;22(6):991-999. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01303-2. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
6
Pricing of orphan drugs in oncology and rare diseases.肿瘤学和罕见病领域中孤儿药的定价
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2020 Dec 1;8(1):1838191. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2020.1838191.
7
Affordability Challenges to Value-Based Pricing: Mass Diseases, Orphan Diseases, and Cures.基于价值定价的可负担性挑战:大规模疾病、罕见病与治愈方法
Value Health. 2018 Mar;21(3):252-257. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.12.018.
8
Paying for the Orphan Drug System: break or bend? Is it time for a new evaluation system for payers in Europe to take account of new rare disease treatments?支付孤儿药系统费用:是坚持还是妥协?是否到了欧洲的支付方采用新的评估体系来考虑新的罕见病治疗方法的时候了?
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012 Sep 26;7:74. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-7-74.
9
[Risk sharing methods in middle income countries].[中等收入国家的风险分担方法]
Acta Pharm Hung. 2012;82(1):43-52.
10
Assessing social preferences in reimbursement negotiations for new Pharmaceuticals in Oncology: an experimental design to analyse willingness to pay and willingness to accept.评估肿瘤学中新型药品报销谈判中的社会偏好:一种分析支付意愿和接受意愿的实验设计。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 16;21(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06231-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Importance of Health Economics and Outcomes Research in the Product Lifecycle.健康经济学与结果研究在产品生命周期中的重要性。
Pharmaceut Med. 2025 Apr 14. doi: 10.1007/s40290-025-00564-z.
2
Equity and capacity to benefit from early access to medicines schemes.公平性以及从早期药品获取计划中受益的能力。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Apr 10;24(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02416-3.
3
Debates over orphan drug pricing: a meta-narrative literature review.关于罕见病药物定价的争论:一项元叙事文献综述
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025 Mar 7;20(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13023-025-03634-2.
4
Drug pricing models, no 'one-size-fits-all' approach: a systematic review and critical evaluation of pricing models in an evolving pharmaceutical landscape.药品定价模式,不存在“一刀切”的方法:对不断演变的制药格局中定价模式的系统评价与批判性评估
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Nov 4. doi: 10.1007/s10198-024-01731-w.
5
Valuation of Medical Innovation Handling with Uncertainty and Risk.医疗创新的估值:应对不确定性与风险
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2024 Aug 1;12(3):199-208. doi: 10.3390/jmahp12030016. eCollection 2024 Sep.
6
Valuation of Treatments for Rare Diseases: A Systematic Literature Review of Societal Preference Studies.罕见病治疗方法的评估:社会偏好研究的系统文献综述。
Adv Ther. 2023 Feb;40(2):393-424. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02359-z. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
7
Pricing Zolgensma - the world's most expensive drug.诺西那生钠注射液定价——全球最昂贵的药物。 (注:Zolgensma是治疗脊髓性肌萎缩症的药物,中文名为诺西那生钠注射液,但原英文文本未明确指出,按照要求直接翻译。)
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2021 Dec 29;10(1):2022353. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2021.2022353. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Pricing of orphan drugs in oncology and rare diseases.肿瘤学和罕见病领域中孤儿药的定价
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2020 Dec 1;8(1):1838191. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2020.1838191.
2
Economic comments on proposal for a novel cancer drug pricing model.关于一种新型癌症药物定价模式提案的经济学评论
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep;15(9):587. doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0083-2.
3
Sustainability and affordability of cancer drugs: a novel pricing model.癌症药物的可持续性与可负担性:一种新型定价模式
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul;15(7):405-406. doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0027-x.
4
Looking back and moving forward: On the application of proportional shortfall in healthcare priority setting in the Netherlands.回顾与展望:荷兰医疗卫生优先事项配置中应用比例不足的情况。
Health Policy. 2018 Jun;122(6):621-629. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
5
Economic viability of Stratified Medicine concepts: An investor perspective on drivers and conditions that favour using Stratified Medicine approaches in a cost-contained healthcare environment.分层医学概念的经济可行性:投资者对在成本可控的医疗环境中采用分层医学方法的驱动因素和条件的看法。
N Biotechnol. 2016 Dec 25;33(6):860-867. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
6
Practical issues in handling data input and uncertainty in a budget impact analysis.处理预算影响分析中数据输入和不确定性的实际问题。
Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Jun;12(3):231-41. doi: 10.1007/s10198-010-0236-4. Epub 2010 Apr 3.