Jarrin Robert, Barrett Meredith A, Kaye Leanne, Sayiner Sibel, von Leer Amanda, Johns Jennifer, D'Andrea Larissa, Nunez Carlos, Ostrovsky Andrey
The Omega Concern, LLC, Washington, DC, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Mar 12;4(1):50. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00421-8.
The use of remote monitoring and virtual visits has accelerated to support socially-distanced patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite the necessity of this expansion, ambiguity in coding is hindering adoption and patient access, most notably for remote physiologic monitoring due to a lack of definition of the term “physiologic”. In this analysis, we describe the history of remote monitoring code development, present several examples in respiratory disease and other chronic conditions in which gaps and confusion remain and suggest ways to clarify and broaden coverage to ensure equitable access to remote monitoring.
在新冠疫情期间,远程监测和虚拟问诊的应用加速发展,以支持保持社交距离的患者护理。尽管这种扩展很有必要,但编码的不明确阻碍了其采用和患者获取,尤其是对于远程生理监测,因为“生理”一词缺乏定义。在本分析中,我们描述了远程监测代码的发展历程,列举了呼吸系统疾病和其他慢性病中仍存在差距和困惑的几个例子,并提出了澄清和扩大覆盖范围的方法,以确保公平获取远程监测服务。