• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Drug presence in driving deaths in Maryland: Comparing trends and prevalence in medical examiner and FARS data.马里兰州驾驶死亡中的药物存在:比较法医和 FARS 数据中的趋势和流行率。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 May;154:106066. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106066. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
2
Geographic variation and trends in opioid-involved crash deaths in Maryland: 2006-2017.马里兰州与阿片类药物相关的撞车死亡的地域差异和趋势:2006-2017 年。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Apr;125:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
3
Alcohol and drug presence in traffic crash fatalities before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: Evaluation of the fatality analysis reporting system (FARS) and linked medical examiner-vital records data in Clackamas, Multnomah, and Washington County, Oregon, 2019-2021.2019 - 2021年俄勒冈州克拉卡马斯县、莫特诺马县和华盛顿县COVID - 19大流行前后交通碰撞死亡事故中酒精和药物的存在情况:死亡分析报告系统(FARS)及相关法医 - 生命记录数据评估
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2024 Apr 26;8:100468. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100468. eCollection 2024.
4
Pooling data from fatality analysis reporting system (FARS) and generalized estimates system (GES) to explore the continuum of injury severity spectrum.整合来自死亡分析报告系统(FARS)和广义估计系统(GES)的数据,以探索损伤严重程度谱的连续性。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Nov;84:112-27. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.08.009. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
5
Work-related fatal motor vehicle traffic crashes: Matching of 2010 data from the Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries and the Fatality Analysis Reporting System.工作相关致命机动车交通碰撞:2010 年人口普查致命职业伤害数据与死亡分析报告系统数据的匹配。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Jul;92:97-106. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
6
The need to improve information on road user type in National Vital Statistics System mortality data.需要改进国家生命统计系统死亡率数据中关于道路使用者类型的信息。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(3):276-281. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1576036. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
7
Reporting of unknown drug test results in the Fatality Analysis Reporting System and associated factors, 2000-2020.2000 - 2020年死亡分析报告系统中未知药物检测结果的报告及相关因素
Traffic Inj Prev. 2023;24(2):109-113. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2155786. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
8
Potentially preventable prehospital deaths from motor vehicle collisions.机动车碰撞导致的潜在可预防的院前死亡。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Oct 2;17(7):676-80. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1149580. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
9
Undercounting of large trucks in federal and state crash databases: Extent of problem and how to improve accuracy of truck classifications.联邦和州级碰撞事故数据库中大型卡车数量统计不足:问题程度及提高卡车分类准确性的方法。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016;17(2):202-8. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1034273. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
10
The epidemiology of pedestrian fatalities and substance use in Georgia, United States, 2007-2016.美国乔治亚州 2007-2016 年行人死亡与物质使用的流行病学研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Jan;134:105329. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105329. Epub 2019 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Using a Safe System Framework to Examine the Roadway Mortality Increase Pre-COVID-19 and in the COVID-19 Era in New York State.使用安全系统框架研究纽约州在新冠疫情前及新冠疫情时代道路死亡率的上升情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jan 3;22(1):61. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22010061.
2
Alcohol and drug presence in traffic crash fatalities before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: Evaluation of the fatality analysis reporting system (FARS) and linked medical examiner-vital records data in Clackamas, Multnomah, and Washington County, Oregon, 2019-2021.2019 - 2021年俄勒冈州克拉卡马斯县、莫特诺马县和华盛顿县COVID - 19大流行前后交通碰撞死亡事故中酒精和药物的存在情况:死亡分析报告系统(FARS)及相关法医 - 生命记录数据评估
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2024 Apr 26;8:100468. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100468. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Geographic variation and trends in opioid-involved crash deaths in Maryland: 2006-2017.马里兰州与阿片类药物相关的撞车死亡的地域差异和趋势:2006-2017 年。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Apr;125:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
2
Use of multiple data sources to identify specific drugs and other factors associated with drug and alcohol screening of fatally injured motor vehicle drivers.利用多个数据源识别与致命性机动车事故驾驶员药物和酒精筛查相关的特定药物和其他因素。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Jan;122:287-294. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
3
Differences in state drug testing and reporting by driver type in U.S. fatal traffic crashes.美国致命交通事故中按驾驶员类型划分的各州药物检测与报告差异。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Jul;92:122-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
4
Concordance of motor vehicle crash, emergency department, and inpatient hospitalization data sets in the identification of drugs in injured drivers.在识别受伤驾驶员中的药物时,机动车辆碰撞、急诊和住院数据集的一致性。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(7):680-9. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.757310.

马里兰州驾驶死亡中的药物存在:比较法医和 FARS 数据中的趋势和流行率。

Drug presence in driving deaths in Maryland: Comparing trends and prevalence in medical examiner and FARS data.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and ManagEment, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, United States.

Department of Health Policy and ManagEment, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, United States.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2021 May;154:106066. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106066. Epub 2021 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2021.106066
PMID:33714054
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8375081/
Abstract

Accurate and reliable information on drug use by road users is essential to inform safety policy development but the reliability of national data has been questioned. There are two primary repositories of drug test information from fatal motor vehicle crashes in Maryland: (1) the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS), which is a national crash database managed by the US Department of Transportation, and (2) the Maryland Medical Examiner (ME). In this study, we compared drug test information for people killed in crashes in Maryland between the FARS system and ME from 2006 - 2018. As ME records are the primary source for the FARS data from Maryland, these two data sets should be closely correlated. We used probabilistic linkage to match FARS and ME cases and compared matched cases by individual drug group. Matching was achieved on 83 % of cases (N = 4803 matched pairs). ME data consistently indicated higher overall incidence and trends in the presence of depressants, narcotics, and stimulants in crash deaths. Sensitivity analysis using both strict and relaxed matching criteria did not change this result. Road safety policy and prevention efforts for crashes involving drugs and alcohol require an accurate understanding of both long-term trends and year-to-year changes in drug prevalence. These findings demonstrate the potential value of using ME data as source of drug test information for crash deaths in the United States.

摘要

准确可靠的道路使用者用药信息对于制定安全政策至关重要,但国家数据的可靠性一直受到质疑。马里兰州有两个主要的致命机动车事故药物检测信息库:(1)由美国交通部管理的国家事故数据库——伤亡分析报告系统(FARS),以及(2)马里兰州法医(ME)。在这项研究中,我们比较了 2006 年至 2018 年期间 FARS 系统和 ME 记录的马里兰州车祸死亡者的药物检测信息。由于 ME 记录是 FARS 数据中马里兰州的主要来源,这两个数据集应该密切相关。我们使用概率链接来匹配 FARS 和 ME 案例,并按个体药物组比较匹配案例。83%的案例(N=4803 对匹配案例)实现了匹配。ME 数据始终表明,在车祸死亡者中,镇静剂、麻醉剂和兴奋剂的总体发生率和趋势更高。使用严格和宽松的匹配标准进行敏感性分析并未改变这一结果。涉及药物和酒精的车祸的道路安全政策和预防工作需要准确了解药物流行的长期趋势和逐年变化。这些发现表明,使用 ME 数据作为美国车祸死亡药物检测信息的来源具有潜在价值。