a National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control & Prevention , Atlanta , Georgia.
b National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control & Prevention , Hyattsville , Maryland.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(3):276-281. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1576036. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
Both the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) and the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) can be used to examine motor vehicle crash (MVC) deaths. These 2 data systems operate independently, using different methods to collect and code information about the type of vehicle (e.g., car, truck, bus) and road user (e.g., occupant, motorcyclist, pedestrian) involved in an MVC. A substantial proportion of MVC deaths in NVSS are coded as "unspecified" road user, which reduces the utility of the NVSS data for describing burden and identifying prevention measures. This study aimed to describe characteristics of unspecified road user deaths in NVSS to further our understanding of how these groups may be similar to occupant road user deaths. Using data from 1999 to 2015, we compared NVSS and FARS MVC death counts by road user type, overall and by age group, gender, and year. In addition, we examined factors associated with the categorization of an MVC death as unspecified road user such as state of residence of decedent, type of medical death investigation system, and place of death. The number of MVC occupant deaths in NVSS was smaller than that in FARS in each year and the number of unspecified road user deaths in NVSS was greater than that in FARS. The sum of the number of occupant and unspecified road user deaths in NVSS, however, was approximately equal to the number of FARS occupant deaths. Age group and gender distributions were roughly equivalent for NVSS and FARS occupants and NVSS unspecified road users. Within NVSS, the number of MVC deaths listed as unspecified road user varied across states and over time. Other categories of road users (motorcyclists, pedal cyclists, and pedestrians) were consistent when comparing NVSS and FARS. Our findings suggest that the unspecified road user MVC deaths in NVSS look similar to those of MVC occupants according to selected characteristics. Additional study is needed to identify documentation and reporting challenges in individual states and over time and to identify opportunities for improvement in the coding of road user type in NVSS.
国家生命统计系统(NVSS)和致命事故分析报告系统(FARS)均可用于检查机动车碰撞(MVC)死亡事件。这 2 个数据系统独立运行,使用不同的方法收集和编码有关涉及 MVC 的车辆类型(例如汽车、卡车、公共汽车)和道路使用者(例如乘客、摩托车手、行人)的信息。NVSS 中相当一部分 MVC 死亡被编码为“未指定”道路使用者,这降低了 NVSS 数据在描述负担和确定预防措施方面的效用。本研究旨在描述 NVSS 中未指定道路使用者死亡的特征,以进一步了解这些群体与乘客道路使用者死亡的相似之处。利用 1999 年至 2015 年的数据,我们比较了 NVSS 和 FARS 按道路使用者类型(总体和按年龄组、性别和年份)的 MVC 死亡人数。此外,我们还检查了与 MVC 死亡被归类为未指定道路使用者相关的因素,例如死者的居住州、医疗死亡调查系统的类型和死亡地点。NVSS 中 MVC 乘客死亡人数每年都少于 FARS,而 NVSS 中未指定道路使用者死亡人数多于 FARS。然而,NVSS 中乘客和未指定道路使用者死亡人数之和大致等于 FARS 中乘客死亡人数。NVSS 中的年龄组和性别分布与 FARS 中的乘客和 NVSS 中的未指定道路使用者大致相同。在 NVSS 中,被列为未指定道路使用者的 MVC 死亡人数因州和时间而异。其他道路使用者类别(摩托车手、自行车手和行人)在 NVSS 和 FARS 之间是一致的。我们的研究结果表明,根据选定的特征,NVSS 中未指定道路使用者的 MVC 死亡事件与 MVC 乘客的死亡事件相似。需要进一步研究,以确定各州和随时间推移在道路使用者类型编码方面的文档和报告挑战,并确定改进 NVSS 中道路使用者类型编码的机会。