Suppr超能文献

采用国际创伤问卷对 ICD-11 PTSD 和 CPTSD 的因子分析和混合模型的系统文献回顾。

A systematic literature review of factor analytic and mixture models of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD using the International Trauma Questionnaire.

机构信息

Ulster University, School of Psychology, Coleraine, UK.

Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Ireland.

出版信息

J Anxiety Disord. 2021 Apr;79:102381. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102381. Epub 2021 Mar 1.

Abstract

The 11th version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11; WHO, 2018) describes two distinct trauma related disorders, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Complex PTSD (CPTSD). This review aims to summarise and synthesize evidence from factor analytic and mixture modelling studies that have investigated the latent structure of the International Trauma Questionnaire. A systematic search of PsycInfo, Web of Science, Scopus and Pubmed databases was conducted to identify relevant articles. Thirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. The latent structure of the ITQ was best represented by two models; a correlated six-factor model (Re-experiencing, Avoidance, Threat, Affect Dysregulation, Negative Self Concept, and Disturbed Relationships) and a two-factor second-order model (PTSD and Disturbances in Self-Organization). Mixture model studies consistently identified distinct classes representing those displaying PTSD and CPTSD symptoms. Numerous studies demonstrated support for the factorial and discriminant validity of PTSD and CPTSD when analysed in conjunction with other variables. Overall, support was found for the conceptual coherence of PTSD and CPTSD as empirically distinguishable disorders, as measured by the ITQ. The available evidence demonstrates that the ITQ is a valid measure of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD. Recommendations for future research are included.

摘要

第 11 版国际疾病分类(ICD-11;世界卫生组织,2018 年)描述了两种不同的与创伤相关的障碍,创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂性创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)。本综述旨在总结和综合来自因子分析和混合模型研究的证据,这些研究调查了国际创伤问卷的潜在结构。系统地检索了 PsycInfo、Web of Science、Scopus 和 Pubmed 数据库,以确定相关文章。符合本系统综述纳入标准的有 33 项研究。国际创伤问卷的潜在结构最好由两个模型来表示;一个相关的六因素模型(再体验、回避、威胁、情感失调、消极自我概念和人际关系紊乱)和一个二阶双因素模型(PTSD 和自我组织障碍)。混合模型研究一致发现,代表表现出 PTSD 和 CPTSD 症状的不同类别。许多研究表明,当与其他变量一起分析时,PTSD 和 CPTSD 的因子和判别有效性得到支持。总体而言,国际创伤问卷支持 PTSD 和 CPTSD 作为可区分的实证障碍的概念连贯性。现有证据表明,国际创伤问卷是 ICD-11 PTSD 和 CPTSD 的有效测量工具。包括对未来研究的建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验