• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伊朗寻求治疗人群中ICD-11复杂性创伤后应激障碍症状的网络分析

A network analysis of ICD-11 complex PTSD symptoms in the treatment-seeking population in Iran.

作者信息

Mohammadi Zahra, Dehghani Mahmood, Lavasani Fahimeh Fathali, Farahani Hojjatollah, Ashouri Ahmad, Omidbakhsh Zahra

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health (Tehran Institute of Psychiatry), Iran University of Medical Sciences, No. 1, Shahid Mansouri St., Niayesh St., Sattar Khan St, Tehran, 1445613111, Iran.

Department of Psychology, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 4;25(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06444-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-024-06444-1
PMID:40038656
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11881451/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The 11th revision of the World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) introduces a new disorder called complex posttraumatic stress disorder. This disorder is heterogeneous, and identifying its core symptoms is important for understanding its different aspects. The network approach to psychopathology allows for examining the structure of Complex PTSD at a symptom level, which helps in analyzing direct interactions between symptoms. This study aimed to explore the symptom structure of complex PTSD and identify critical symptoms in the treatment-seeking population in Iran.

METHODS

Participants consisted of 463 people referred to comprehensive health centers in Tehran from September to December 2023 with psychopathological syndromes who had a history of trauma at different developmental stages. Complex PTSD symptoms were assessed using the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) and International Measurement of Exposure to Traumatic Event checklist. Network analysis was applied to identify the most central symptoms (nodes) and associations between symptoms (edges) by the graphical LASSO algorithm and the EBCglasso method for network estimation.

RESULTS

The result showed that the network of estimated symptoms for Complex PTSD in Iranian culture was highly accurate and stable. The most central symptoms in this network were feelings of failure and worthlessness. Additionally, "long-term upset" was identified as the connection between PTSD symptoms and DSO.

CONCLUSIONS

The study determined that feelings of failure and worthlessness are the most central symptoms in the Complex PTSD network. It was suggested that these symptoms should be given priority in theoretical and treatment models of Complex PTSD.

摘要

引言

世界卫生组织《国际疾病分类》(ICD - 11)的第11次修订引入了一种名为复杂性创伤后应激障碍的新疾病。这种疾病具有异质性,识别其核心症状对于理解其不同方面很重要。精神病理学的网络方法允许在症状层面检查复杂性创伤后应激障碍的结构,这有助于分析症状之间的直接相互作用。本研究旨在探讨伊朗寻求治疗人群中复杂性创伤后应激障碍的症状结构,并识别关键症状。

方法

参与者包括2023年9月至12月转诊至德黑兰综合健康中心、患有精神病理综合征且在不同发育阶段有创伤史的463人。使用国际创伤问卷(ITQ)和创伤事件暴露国际测量清单评估复杂性创伤后应激障碍症状。应用网络分析,通过图形套索算法和用于网络估计的EBCglasso方法识别最核心的症状(节点)和症状之间的关联(边)。

结果

结果表明,伊朗文化中复杂性创伤后应激障碍估计症状的网络高度准确且稳定。该网络中最核心的症状是失败感和无价值感。此外,“长期心烦意乱”被确定为创伤后应激障碍症状与功能失调性态度之间的联系。

结论

该研究确定失败感和无价值感是复杂性创伤后应激障碍网络中最核心的症状。建议在复杂性创伤后应激障碍的理论和治疗模型中优先考虑这些症状。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b4d/11881451/cbaf5146ff16/12888_2024_6444_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b4d/11881451/b63c817730a2/12888_2024_6444_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b4d/11881451/cbaf5146ff16/12888_2024_6444_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b4d/11881451/b63c817730a2/12888_2024_6444_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b4d/11881451/cbaf5146ff16/12888_2024_6444_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A network analysis of ICD-11 complex PTSD symptoms in the treatment-seeking population in Iran.伊朗寻求治疗人群中ICD-11复杂性创伤后应激障碍症状的网络分析
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 4;25(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06444-1.
2
Symptom structure of complex posttraumatic stress disorder among Chinese young adults with childhood trauma: a network analysis.童年创伤的中国青年成年人复杂创伤后应激障碍的症状结构:网络分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Dec 5;23(1):911. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05423-2.
3
Construction and initial validation of the International Trauma Questionnaire - Caregiver Version (ITQ-CG): assessing ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD in children from caregiver perspective.国际创伤问卷-照顾者版(ITQ-CG)的构建与初步验证:从照顾者角度评估儿童的国际疾病分类第11版创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂PTSD(CPTSD)
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2493025. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2493025. Epub 2025 May 6.
4
Measuring post-traumatic stress disorder and complex post-traumatic stress disorder using the International Trauma Questionnaire: results from a Hungarian clinical and non-clinical sample.使用国际创伤问卷测量创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍:来自匈牙利临床和非临床样本的结果。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(1):2152929. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2022.2152929.
5
Polish adaptation and validation of the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) for PTSD and cPTSD according to ICD-11 in non-clinical and clinical samples.根据国际疾病分类第11版(ICD-11),在非临床和临床样本中对用于创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍(cPTSD)的国际创伤问卷(ITQ)进行波兰语改编及验证。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2468116. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2468116. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
6
A Cross-Cultural Comparison of ICD-11 Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Networks in Austria, the United Kingdom, and Lithuania.奥地利、英国和立陶宛ICD-11复杂创伤后应激障碍症状网络的跨文化比较
J Trauma Stress. 2020 Feb;33(1):41-51. doi: 10.1002/jts.22361. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
7
Validation of the International Trauma Interview (ITI) among treatment-seeking people with adverse childhood experiences in South Korea.韩国有童年不良经历的求治者中国际创伤访谈(ITI)的效度验证
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2447182. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2447182. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
8
PTSD and complex PTSD in treatment-seeking Danish soldiers: a replication of Folke et al. (2019) using the International Trauma Questionnaire.寻求治疗的丹麦士兵中的创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍:使用国际创伤问卷对 Folke 等人(2019 年)的研究进行复制。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Jun 28;12(1):1930703. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1930703. eCollection 2021.
9
ICD-11 complex PTSD among Israeli male perpetrators of intimate partner violence: Construct validity and risk factors.《国际疾病分类第 11 版创伤后应激障碍诊断标准在以色列亲密伴侣暴力男性施害者中的应用:结构效度与风险因素》
J Anxiety Disord. 2018 Mar;54:49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
10
Examination of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD using the International Trauma Questionnaire - Child and Adolescent version (ITQ-CA) in a sample of Danish children and adolescents exposed to abuse.使用国际创伤问卷-儿童和青少年版(ITQ-CA)对丹麦受虐待的儿童和青少年样本中 ICD-11 PTSD 和 CPTSD 的检查。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(1):2178761. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2178761.

本文引用的文献

1
Symptom structure of complex posttraumatic stress disorder among Chinese young adults with childhood trauma: a network analysis.童年创伤的中国青年成年人复杂创伤后应激障碍的症状结构:网络分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Dec 5;23(1):911. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05423-2.
2
The memory and identity theory of ICD-11 complex posttraumatic stress disorder.ICD-11 复杂创伤后应激障碍的记忆与身份理论。
Psychol Rev. 2023 Jul;130(4):1044-1065. doi: 10.1037/rev0000418.
3
Exploring the links between various traumatic experiences and ICD-11 PTSD and Complex PTSD: A cross-sectional study.
探索各种创伤经历与《国际疾病分类第11版》创伤后应激障碍及复杂性创伤后应激障碍之间的联系:一项横断面研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 15;13:896981. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.896981. eCollection 2022.
4
Complex post-traumatic stress disorder.复杂性创伤后应激障碍。
Lancet. 2022 Jul 2;400(10345):60-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00821-2.
5
Cultural concepts of distress and complex PTSD: Future directions for research and treatment.痛苦与复杂创伤后应激障碍的文化概念:研究与治疗的未来方向
Clin Psychol Rev. 2022 Apr;93:102143. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102143. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
6
The latent structure of ICD-11 posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD in a general population sample from USA: A factor mixture modelling approach.美国普通人群样本中ICD-11创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂性PTSD的潜在结构:一种因子混合建模方法。
J Anxiety Disord. 2022 Jan;85:102497. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102497. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
7
A systematic literature review of factor analytic and mixture models of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD using the International Trauma Questionnaire.采用国际创伤问卷对 ICD-11 PTSD 和 CPTSD 的因子分析和混合模型的系统文献回顾。
J Anxiety Disord. 2021 Apr;79:102381. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102381. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
8
Comparing the network structure of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD in three African countries.比较三个非洲国家中ICD-11创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂性PTSD的网络结构。
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Apr;136:80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.01.041. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
9
Network Analysis of Psychopathology: Controversies and Challenges.网络分析在精神病理学中的应用:争议与挑战。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2021 May 7;17:31-53. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-092850. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
10
The network structure of ICD-11 complex post-traumatic stress disorder across different traumatic life events.国际疾病分类第11版复杂创伤后应激障碍在不同创伤性生活事件中的网络结构
World Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;19(3):400-401. doi: 10.1002/wps.20795.