Suppr超能文献

基于空间分辨排放因子的方法降低居民部门空气污染物排放估算的不确定性

Spatially Resolved Emission Factors to Reduce Uncertainties in Air Pollutant Emission Estimates from the Residential Sector.

机构信息

Laboratory for Earth Surface Process, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.

State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Urban Ecological Environment Simulation and Protetion, South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Guangzhou 510655, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Apr 20;55(8):4483-4493. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c08568. Epub 2021 Mar 15.

Abstract

The residential sector is a major source of air pollutant emission inventory uncertainties. A nationwide field emission measurement campaign was conducted in rural China to evaluate the variabilities of realistic emission factors (EFs) from indoor solid fuel combustion. For a total of 1313 burning events, the overall average EFs (±standard deviation) of PM were 8.93 ± 6.95 and 7.33 ± 9.01 g/kg for biomass and coals, respectively, and 89.3 ± 51.2 and 114 ± 87 g/kg for CO. Higher EFs were found from burning of uncompressed straws, while lower EFs were found from processed biomass pellets, coal briquettes, and relatively clean anthracite coals. Modified combustion efficiency was found to be the most significant factor associated with variations in CO EFs, whereas for PM, fuel and stove differences determined its variations. Weak correlations between PM and CO indicated high uncertainties in using CO as a surrogate for PM. EFs accurately fit log-normal distributions, and obvious spatial heterogeneity was observed attributed to different fuel-stove combinations across the country. Emission estimation variabilities, which are determined by the interquartile ranges divided by the median values, were notably reduced when spatially resolved EFs were adopted in the inventory.

摘要

住宅部门是空气污染物排放清单不确定性的主要来源。在中国农村进行了一次全国性的现场排放测量活动,以评估室内固体燃料燃烧的实际排放因子(EF)的可变性。在总共 1313 次燃烧事件中,生物质和煤的整体平均 PM 排放因子(±标准差)分别为 8.93±6.95 和 7.33±9.01 g/kg,CO 分别为 89.3±51.2 和 114±87 g/kg。发现未压缩的秸秆燃烧时 EF 较高,而经过加工的生物质颗粒、煤球和相对清洁的无烟煤燃烧时 EF 较低。发现改进的燃烧效率是与 CO EF 变化最相关的因素,而对于 PM,燃料和炉子差异决定了其变化。PM 和 CO 之间的弱相关性表明,使用 CO 作为 PM 的替代物存在高度不确定性。EF 准确地符合对数正态分布,并且观察到明显的空间异质性,这归因于全国不同的燃料-炉子组合。排放估算的可变性由四分位距除以中位数确定,当在清单中采用空间分辨的 EF 时,可变性明显降低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验