• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

领导文化的瓶颈隐喻:关于领导力的共同理解如何在群体中形成并阻碍领导者的多样性和有效性。

The Bottleneck Metaphor of Leadership Culture: How Shared Understandings About Leadership Develop in Groups and Impede Diversity and Effectiveness of Leaders.

作者信息

Özcan Muaz

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 25;12:635751. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635751. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635751
PMID:33716904
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7947711/
Abstract

There are two big problems related to leadership today: unequal representation and high failure rates among leaders. This conceptual paper argues that commonly shared values, assumptions, and beliefs about leadership, i.e., universal leadership culture, are the common cause of both problems. After the concepts and levels related to leadership culture were explained, we introduce a multilevel, multi-actor process model named the bottleneck metaphor of leadership culture. This metaphor describes how leadership cultures are co-constructed by multiple actors based on their involvement in leader selection and reproduce themselves in groups over time based on emergent leaders' characteristics. Next, a diagnostic tool called "the leadership mirror" is proposed for organizations that want to assess their leadership culture's current state as a starting point for further interventions. Specific suggestions are made for various actors, ranging from individuals to organizations, for their possible roles in preventing undesired leadership cultures.

摘要

当今领导力存在两个重大问题

代表性不平等以及领导者中的高失败率。这篇概念性论文认为,关于领导力的共同价值观、假设和信念,即普遍的领导文化,是这两个问题的共同根源。在解释了与领导文化相关的概念和层次之后,我们引入了一个名为领导文化瓶颈隐喻的多层次、多主体过程模型。这个隐喻描述了领导文化是如何由多个主体基于他们在领导者选拔中的参与共同构建的,以及随着时间的推移如何基于新兴领导者的特征在群体中自我复制。接下来,为那些想要评估其领导文化当前状态作为进一步干预起点的组织,提出了一种名为“领导之镜”的诊断工具。针对从个人到组织的各类主体,就他们在预防不良领导文化中可能发挥的作用提出了具体建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efdb/7947711/8f0d30fd3fa5/fpsyg-12-635751-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efdb/7947711/3c52081517fd/fpsyg-12-635751-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efdb/7947711/8f0d30fd3fa5/fpsyg-12-635751-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efdb/7947711/3c52081517fd/fpsyg-12-635751-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efdb/7947711/8f0d30fd3fa5/fpsyg-12-635751-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Bottleneck Metaphor of Leadership Culture: How Shared Understandings About Leadership Develop in Groups and Impede Diversity and Effectiveness of Leaders.领导文化的瓶颈隐喻:关于领导力的共同理解如何在群体中形成并阻碍领导者的多样性和有效性。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 25;12:635751. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635751. eCollection 2021.
2
COVID-19 crisis management of German ICU clinicians in leadership - a metaphor analysis.德国 ICU 临床医生在领导力下的 COVID-19 危机管理-隐喻分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 8;11:1160094. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1160094. eCollection 2023.
3
The Humble Leader: Association of Discrepancies in Leader and Follower Ratings of Implementation Leadership With Organizational Climate in Mental Health.谦逊型领导者:心理健康领域中领导者与追随者对实施领导力的评价差异与组织氛围的关联
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Feb 1;68(2):115-122. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600062. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
4
Leadership assumptions on implementation of patient involvement methods.领导对实施患者参与方法的假设。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 26;21(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06497-y.
5
A meta-analytic test of organizational culture's association with elements of an organization's system and its relative predictive validity on organizational outcomes.元分析检验组织文化与组织系统要素的关系及其对组织结果的相对预测效度。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Jun;104(6):832-850. doi: 10.1037/apl0000380. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
6
Safety culture across cultures.跨文化的安全文化。
Saf Sci. 2019 Dec;120:402-410. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.07.021.
7
Diversity and leadership in a changing world.多元与变革世界中的领导力
Am Psychol. 2010 Apr;65(3):216-24. doi: 10.1037/a0018957.
8
International Nursing: Caring in Nursing Leadership-A Meta-ethnography From the Nurse Leader's Perspective.国际护理:护理领导中的关怀——基于护士长视角的元民族志研究
Nurs Adm Q. 2018 Oct/Dec;42(4):E1-E19. doi: 10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000314.
9
Discrepancies in Leader and Follower Ratings of Transformational Leadership: Relationship with Organizational Culture in Mental Health.变革型领导中领导者与追随者评分的差异:与心理健康领域组织文化的关系
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017 Jul;44(4):480-491. doi: 10.1007/s10488-015-0672-7.
10
Why Nurse Leaders Derail: Preventing and Rebounding From Leadership Failure.护士领导者为何会失败:预防领导力失败及从失败中反弹
Nurs Adm Q. 2019 Apr/Jun;43(2):113-122. doi: 10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000345.

本文引用的文献

1
Population Bottlenecks Strongly Influence the Evolutionary Trajectory to Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Escherichia coli.人口瓶颈强烈影响大肠杆菌进化为氟喹诺酮耐药的轨迹。
Mol Biol Evol. 2020 Jun 1;37(6):1637-1646. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa032.
2
Motivation to lead: A meta-analysis and distal-proximal model of motivation and leadership.领导动机:动机和领导的元分析与远近模型。
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Apr;105(4):331-354. doi: 10.1037/apl0000439. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
3
Motives relate to cooperation in social dilemmas but have an inconsistent association with leadership evaluation.
动机与社会困境中的合作有关,但与领导力评价的关联不一致。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 12;9(1):10118. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45931-4.
4
Shall we serve the dark lords? A meta-analytic review of psychopathy and leadership.我们应该效忠于黑暗领主吗?对精神病态和领导力的元分析综述。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Jan;104(1):183-196. doi: 10.1037/apl0000357. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
5
Leader narcissism and follower outcomes: The counterbalancing effect of leader humility.领导的自恋与下属的结果:领导谦逊的平衡作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Jul;100(4):1203-13. doi: 10.1037/a0038698. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
6
Is there such a thing as "group selection" in the, contextual analysis framework?在情境分析框架中,是否存在“群体选择”这样的事物?
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2015;36(4):484-502. doi: 10.1007/s40656-014-0044-8.
7
An evolutionary model explaining the Neolithic transition from egalitarianism to leadership and despotism.一种解释新石器时代从平等主义向领导力和专制主义转变的进化模型。
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Sep 22;281(1791):20141349. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1349.
8
A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness.共享领导与团队效能的元分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Mar;99(2):181-98. doi: 10.1037/a0034531. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
9
Power changes how the brain responds to others.权力改变大脑对他人的反应方式。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Apr;143(2):755-62. doi: 10.1037/a0033477. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
10
Fearless dominance and the U.S. presidency: implications of psychopathic personality traits for successful and unsuccessful political leadership.无畏的支配欲与美国总统:心理变态人格特质对成功与失败的政治领导的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Sep;103(3):489-505. doi: 10.1037/a0029392. Epub 2012 Jul 23.