Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, 2029 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
Am Psychol. 2010 Apr;65(3):216-24. doi: 10.1037/a0018957.
Scholars of leadership have infrequently addressed the diversity of leaders and followers in terms of culture, gender, race and ethnicity, or sexual orientation. This omission has weakened the ability of research and theory to address some of the most provocative aspects of contemporary leadership, including (a) the limited access of individuals from diverse identity groups to leadership roles; (b) the shaping of leaders' behavior by their dual identities as leaders and members of gender, racial, ethnic, or other identity groups; and (c) the potential of individuals from groups formerly excluded from leadership roles to provide excellent leadership because of their differences from traditional leaders. In addressing such issues, we argue that the joining of the two bodies of theory and research--one pertaining to leadership and the other to diversity--enriches both domains of knowledge and provides guidelines for optimizing leadership in contemporary organizations and nations.
领导学学者很少从文化、性别、种族和民族或性取向等方面来探讨领导者和追随者的多样性。这种忽视削弱了研究和理论解决当代领导最具争议性方面的能力,包括:(a) 来自不同身份群体的个人获得领导角色的机会有限;(b) 领导者的行为受到其作为领导者和性别、种族、民族或其他身份群体成员的双重身份的影响;(c) 来自以前被排除在领导角色之外的群体的个人由于与传统领导者的不同而有可能提供出色的领导。在解决这些问题时,我们认为,将两个理论和研究领域——一个与领导有关,另一个与多样性有关——结合起来,可以丰富这两个知识领域,并为优化当代组织和国家的领导提供指导。