Giampieri Riccardo, Cantini Luca, Del Prete Michela, Bittoni Alessandro, Giglio Enrica, Mandolesi Alessandra, Maccaroni Elena, Lanese Andrea, Meletani Tania, Baleani Maria Giuditta, Bisonni Renato, Scarpelli Marina, Berardi Rossana
Clinical Oncology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, I-60126 Ancona, Italy.
Clinical Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, I-60126 Ancona, Italy.
Oncol Lett. 2021 Apr;21(4):267. doi: 10.3892/ol.2021.12528. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
Despite novel drugs, the prognosis for patients with metastatic gastric cancer remains poor. In rare instances, locoregional therapies are used in addition to standard chemotherapy in patients with oligometastatic involvement. This type of approach has not been supported by solid published evidence. The aim of the present retrospective study was to assess the prognostic impact of factors such as metastatic site, tumour histology and locoregional treatment in patients with metastatic gastric cancer. A total of 184 patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who received at least one line of palliative therapy with doublet or triplet chemotherapy were enrolled in the current analysis. Median overall survival (OS) was 8.32 months (95% CI, 7.02-9.41) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.16 months (95% CI, 3.24-5.08). Lung metastases vs. other sites of metastatic involvement [hazard ratio (HR), 0.27; P=0.0133] and intestinal histology (HR, 0.48; P=0.08) were significantly associated with an improved OS. Improved PFS was also observed (HR, 0.49; P=0.10 and HR, 0.72; P=0.08 for lung metastases and intestinal histology, respectively). Second line chemotherapy and locoregional treatment of metastases (surgery or radiotherapy) were associated with improved OS (HR, 0.52; P<0.0001 and HR, 0.35; P<0.0001, respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed an independent prognostic role for OS only for locoregional treatment, second line treatment and intestinal histology. The present results suggested that the presence of lung metastases alone was not a relevant prognostic factor and was influenced by the availability of further lines of treatment or by locoregional treatments. Locoregional treatments in patients with oligometastatic disease should be offered as they allow prolonged survival in patients with otherwise relatively short life expectancy.
尽管有新型药物,但转移性胃癌患者的预后仍然很差。在少数情况下,对于寡转移的患者,除了标准化疗外还会采用局部区域治疗。这种方法尚未得到确凿的公开证据支持。本回顾性研究的目的是评估转移部位、肿瘤组织学和局部区域治疗等因素对转移性胃癌患者预后的影响。共有184例转移性胃癌或胃食管交界腺癌患者接受了至少一线含双联或三联化疗的姑息治疗,并纳入了本分析。中位总生存期(OS)为8.32个月(95%CI,7.02 - 9.41),中位无进展生存期(PFS)为4.16个月(95%CI,3.24 - 5.08)。肺转移与其他转移部位相比[风险比(HR),0.27;P = 0.0133]以及肠型组织学(HR,0.48;P = 0.08)与OS改善显著相关。PFS也有改善(肺转移和肠型组织学的HR分别为0.49;P = 0.10和HR,0.72;P = 0.08)。二线化疗和转移灶的局部区域治疗(手术或放疗)与OS改善相关(HR分别为0.52;P < 0.000 和HR,0.35;P < 0.0001)。多因素分析证实,仅局部区域治疗、二线治疗和肠型组织学对OS具有独立的预后作用。目前的结果表明,单独存在肺转移不是一个相关的预后因素,并且受到后续治疗方案的可用性或局部区域治疗的影响。对于寡转移疾病患者应提供局部区域治疗,因为这可以使预期寿命相对较短的患者延长生存期。