• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对配备不同等级个人防护装备(PPE)并暴露于两个污水处理厂微生物生物气溶胶的临时入境者和工作人员的职业健康进行定量微生物风险评估。

Quantitative microbial risk assessment for occupational health of temporary entrants and staffs equipped with various grade PPE and exposed to microbial bioaerosols in two WWTPs.

机构信息

School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, 388 Lumo Road, Wuhan, 430074, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021 Aug;94(6):1327-1343. doi: 10.1007/s00420-021-01663-5. Epub 2021 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1007/s00420-021-01663-5
PMID:33721095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7957280/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was to evaluate the occupational health risks of infection from Gram-negative bacteria and Staphylococcus aureus bioaerosols to temporary entrants and staffs equipped with various grade personal protection equipment (PPE) related to wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs).

METHODS

This study determined the emission concentrations of Gram-negative bacteria and Staphylococcus aureus bioaerosols from two WWTPs under various aeration modes. Then, a strict quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) was performed on several exposure scenarios associated with occupational health risks of temporary entrants (researchers, visitors, and inspectors) and staffs (field engineer and laboratory technician).

RESULTS

Although the bioaerosol concentrations were generally regarded as safe according to existing standards, these bioaerosols' health risks were still unacceptable. The microbial bioaerosols posed considerable infection health risks in WWTPs. These risks were generally above the WHO and US EPA benchmarks. The health risks of females were always smaller than those of male of grown-up age group. Staffs that had been exposed to bioaerosols for a long time were found to have higher health risks compared with temporary entrants. In addition, field engineers equipped with PPE rendered low health risks, thus revealing that wearing PPE could effectively reduce the occupational health risks.

CONCLUSION

This study provided novel data and enriched the knowledge of microbial bioaerosol emission's health risks from various aeration modes in WWTPs. Management decisions could be executed by authorities on the basis of the results of QMRA for field engineers equipped with PPE to reduce the related occupational health risks.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估革兰氏阴性菌和金黄色葡萄球菌生物气溶胶对配备各种等级个人防护设备(PPE)的临时进入者和与污水处理厂(WWTP)相关的工作人员的感染职业健康风险。

方法

本研究测定了两种 WWTP 在不同曝气模式下革兰氏阴性菌和金黄色葡萄球菌生物气溶胶的排放浓度。然后,对与临时进入者(研究人员、访客和检查员)和工作人员(现场工程师和实验室技术员)的职业健康风险相关的几个暴露场景进行了严格的定量微生物风险评估(QMRA)。

结果

尽管根据现有标准,生物气溶胶浓度通常被认为是安全的,但这些生物气溶胶的健康风险仍然是不可接受的。微生物生物气溶胶在 WWTP 中构成了相当大的感染健康风险。这些风险通常高于世界卫生组织和美国环保署的基准。成年组女性的健康风险始终小于男性。与临时进入者相比,长期接触生物气溶胶的工作人员发现具有更高的健康风险。此外,配备 PPE 的现场工程师的健康风险较低,这表明佩戴 PPE 可以有效降低职业健康风险。

结论

本研究提供了新颖的数据,并丰富了 WWTP 中不同曝气模式下微生物生物气溶胶排放的健康风险知识。当局可以根据 PPE 配备的现场工程师的 QMRA 结果做出管理决策,以降低相关的职业健康风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04c6/7957280/0d882d849f42/420_2021_1663_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04c6/7957280/748794549887/420_2021_1663_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04c6/7957280/0d882d849f42/420_2021_1663_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04c6/7957280/748794549887/420_2021_1663_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04c6/7957280/0d882d849f42/420_2021_1663_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantitative microbial risk assessment for occupational health of temporary entrants and staffs equipped with various grade PPE and exposed to microbial bioaerosols in two WWTPs.对配备不同等级个人防护装备(PPE)并暴露于两个污水处理厂微生物生物气溶胶的临时入境者和工作人员的职业健康进行定量微生物风险评估。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021 Aug;94(6):1327-1343. doi: 10.1007/s00420-021-01663-5. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
2
Quantitative microbial risk assessment and sensitivity analysis for workers exposed to pathogenic bacterial bioaerosols under various aeration modes in two wastewater treatment plants.定量微生物风险评估及两种污水处理厂不同通风模式下工人接触致病性细菌气溶胶的敏感性分析
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Feb 10;755(Pt 2):142615. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142615. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
3
Quantitative microbial risk assessment of bioaerosols in a wastewater treatment plant by using two aeration modes.采用两种曝气方式对污水处理厂生物气溶胶进行定量微生物风险评估。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Feb;28(7):8140-8150. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11180-6. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
4
Bioaerosols emission characteristics from wastewater treatment aeration tanks and associated health risk exposure assessment during autumn and winter.秋冬季节污水处理曝气池生物气溶胶排放特征及相关健康风险暴露评估
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Dec 10;851(Pt 1):158106. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158106. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
5
Estimating acceptable exposure time for bioaerosols emission in a wastewater treatment plant by reverse quantitative microbial risk assessment based on various risk benchmarks.基于不同风险基准,采用反向定量微生物风险评估估算污水处理厂中生物气溶胶排放的可接受暴露时间。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Feb;29(9):13345-13355. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16699-w. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
6
Seasonal variation of quantitative microbial risk assessment for three airborne enteric bacteria from wastewater treatment plant emissions.污水处理厂排放的三种气载肠道细菌的定量微生物风险评估的季节性变化。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022 Jul 15;240:113689. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113689. Epub 2022 May 26.
7
Bioaerosols emission from source facilities in a wastewater treatment plant: Critical exposure time and sensitivity analysis.污水处理厂源设施的生物气溶胶排放:关键暴露时间和敏感性分析。
Environ Pollut. 2024 Nov 1;360:124611. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124611. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
Bioaerosols emission and exposure risk of a wastewater treatment plant with AO treatment process.AO 处理工艺污水处理厂的生物气溶胶排放和暴露风险。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019 Mar;169:161-168. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.11.018. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
9
Evaluation of Seasonal Variation on the Health Risks Using the Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Approach in a Wastewater Treatment Plant in Hamadan, Iran.利用定量微生物风险评估方法评估伊朗哈马丹市污水处理厂健康风险的季节性变化。
J Res Health Sci. 2023 Mar;23(1):e00576. doi: 10.34172/jrhs.2023.111.
10
Evaluating the threshold limit value of acceptable exposure concentration for exposure to bioaerosols in a wastewater treatment plant: Reverse-quantitative microbial risk assessment and sensitivity analysis.评估污水处理厂中生物气溶胶暴露的可接受暴露浓度阈值:反向定量微生物风险评估与敏感性分析。
J Hazard Mater. 2023 Jun 15;452:130687. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130687. Epub 2022 Dec 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-carcinogenic health risks assessment of bioaerosols.生物气溶胶的非致癌健康风险评估
MethodsX. 2024 Dec 9;14:103088. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.103088. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
The effect of medical face masks on inhalation risk of bacterial bioaerosols in hospital waste decontamination station.医用口罩对医院废物消毒站细菌生物气溶胶吸入风险的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 1;14(1):26259. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69088-x.
3
Applications of Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment to Respiratory Pathogens and Implications for Uptake in Policy: A State-of-the-Science Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Quantitative microbial risk assessment and sensitivity analysis for workers exposed to pathogenic bacterial bioaerosols under various aeration modes in two wastewater treatment plants.定量微生物风险评估及两种污水处理厂不同通风模式下工人接触致病性细菌气溶胶的敏感性分析
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Feb 10;755(Pt 2):142615. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142615. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
2
Size-dependent filtration efficiencies of face masks and respirators for removing SARS-CoV-2-laden aerosols.口罩和呼吸器对去除携带新冠病毒气溶胶的尺寸依赖性过滤效率。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;42(7):906-907. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.366. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
3
定量微生物风险评估在呼吸道病原体中的应用及其在政策采纳中的意义:科学综述。
Environ Health Perspect. 2024 May;132(5):56001. doi: 10.1289/EHP12695. Epub 2024 May 10.
Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks.
常见医用口罩滤布材料的气溶胶过滤效率。
ACS Nano. 2020 May 26;14(5):6339-6347. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c03252. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
4
The coronavirus pandemic and aerosols: Does COVID-19 transmit via expiratory particles?冠状病毒大流行与气溶胶:新冠病毒是否通过呼气颗粒传播?
Aerosol Sci Technol. 2020 Apr 3;0(0):1-4. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2020.1749229. eCollection 2020.
5
Assessment of airborne enteric viruses emitted from wastewater treatment plant: Atmospheric dispersion model, quantitative microbial risk assessment, disease burden.评估污水处理厂排放的空气传播肠道病毒:大气扩散模型、定量微生物风险评估、疾病负担。
Environ Pollut. 2019 Oct;253:464-473. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
6
Establishment of BALB/C mouse models of influenza A H1N1 aerosol inhalation.建立甲型 H1N1 流感病毒气溶胶吸入式 BALB/C 小鼠模型。
J Med Virol. 2019 Nov;91(11):1918-1929. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25550. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
7
Reliability of Selective Media for Recovery of Staphylococci from Cheese.用于从奶酪中分离葡萄球菌的选择性培养基的可靠性
J Food Prot. 1977 Jan;40(1):11-16. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-40.1.11.
8
Indoor Air Quality and Potential Health Risk Impacts of Exposure to Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria in an Office Rooms in Southern Poland.波兰南部办公场所中抗生素耐药菌的室内空气质量及潜在健康风险影响
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 21;15(11):2604. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112604.
9
Quantification of multi-antibiotic resistant opportunistic pathogenic bacteria in bioaerosols in and around a pharmaceutical wastewater treatment plant.定量分析制药厂废水处理厂内外生物气溶胶中的多抗生素耐药机会性病原体细菌。
J Environ Sci (China). 2018 Oct;72:53-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2017.12.011. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
10
Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment for Workers Exposed to Bioaerosol in Wastewater Treatment Plants Aimed at the Choice and Setup of Safety Measures.定量微生物风险评估在污水处理厂暴露于生物气溶胶的工人,旨在选择和设置安全措施。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 14;15(7):1490. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071490.