• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
On the epistemology of resilience in public health: a novel perspective in a changing world.论公共卫生领域复原力的认识论:变化世界中的新视角。
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jan 17;4:1453006. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1453006. eCollection 2024.
2
A mixed-methods model for healthcare system responsiveness to public health: insights from Iranian experts.医疗保健系统对公共卫生响应的混合方法模型:来自伊朗专家的见解。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Feb 21;23(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01295-y.
3
Global Health System Resilience during Encounters with Stressors - Lessons Learnt from Cancer Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic.全球卫生系统应对压力源的韧性 - 从 COVID-19 大流行期间的癌症服务中吸取的经验教训。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2023 Apr;35(4):e289-e300. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.01.004. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
4
What is "hospital resilience"? A scoping review on conceptualization, operationalization, and evaluation.“医院弹性”是什么?概念化、操作化和评估的范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 14;10:1009400. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1009400. eCollection 2022.
5
Building community disaster resilience: perspectives from a large urban county department of public health.建设社区灾害韧性:来自一个大型城市县公共卫生部门的观点。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Jul;103(7):1190-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301268. Epub 2013 May 16.
6
Ethical Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Workforce Management and Policymaking: Bridging Philosophy and Practice.护理劳动力管理与政策制定中的伦理人工智能:弥合哲学与实践的差距
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Apr 8;2025:7954013. doi: 10.1155/jonm/7954013. eCollection 2025.
7
Health System Resilience in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: Perspective on the Recent Lessons Learned.东地中海区域的卫生系统韧性:近期经验教训透视
Interact J Med Res. 2022 Dec 21;11(2):e41144. doi: 10.2196/41144.
8
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
9
Public Health's Next Step in Advancing Equity: Re-evaluating Epistemological Assumptions to Move Social Determinants From Theory to Practice.公共卫生在推进公平方面的下一步:重新评估认识论假设,将社会决定因素从理论推向实践。
Front Public Health. 2020 May 7;8:131. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00131. eCollection 2020.
10
Multisectoral action towards sustainable development goal 3.d and building health systems resilience during and beyond COVID-19: Findings from an INTOSAI development initiative and World Health Organization collaboration.多部门行动以实现可持续发展目标 3.d 并在 COVID-19 期间和之后增强卫生系统的弹性:来自国际审计组织发展倡议和世界卫生组织合作的发现。
Front Public Health. 2023 May 19;11:1104669. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1104669. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive estimations of health systems resilience using machine learning.使用机器学习对卫生系统恢复力进行预测性评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 15;25(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03111-7.
2
Volatile outcomes of essential public health functions: a cross-sectional study of surveillance and equitable access on Brazil's Unified Health System (SUS).基本公共卫生职能的不稳定成果:关于巴西统一卫生系统(SUS)监测与公平可及性的横断面研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 11;13:1613822. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1613822. eCollection 2025.
3
Leveraging machine learning on the role of hospitalizations in the dynamics of dengue spread in Brazil: an ecological study of health systems resilience.利用机器学习研究住院治疗在巴西登革热传播动态中的作用:卫生系统复原力的生态学研究
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 Feb 24;44:101042. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101042. eCollection 2025 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
The resilience of the Brazilian Unified Health System is not (only) in responding to disasters.巴西统一卫生系统的弹性不仅在于应对灾害。
Rev Saude Publica. 2024 Jun 24;58:22. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2024058005731. eCollection 2024.
2
War on Gaza: the impossible duty to care for the critically ill.加沙之战:照顾重症患者的艰巨任务。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Feb;50(2):311-313. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07309-z. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
3
War and Health Crisis in Gaza.加沙的战争与健康危机
Saudi Med J. 2024 Jan;45(1):9. doi: 10.15537/smj.2023.44.1.20240012.
4
Learning from the universal, proactive outreach of the Brazilian Community Health Worker model: impact of a Community Health and Wellbeing Worker initiative on vaccination, cancer screening and NHS health check uptake in a deprived community in the UK.借鉴巴西社区卫生工作者模式的普遍、主动外展经验:在英国一个贫困社区开展社区卫生和健康工作者计划对疫苗接种、癌症筛查和国民保健制度健康检查参与度的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 12;23(1):1092. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10084-8.
5
Transformative dimensions of resilience and brittleness during health systems' collapse: a case study in Brazil using the Functional Resonance Analysis Method.韧性和脆性在卫生系统崩溃期间的变革维度:使用功能共振分析方法对巴西的案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 10;23(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09301-1.
6
Confronting the consequences of racism, xenophobia, and discrimination on health and health-care systems.直面种族主义、仇外心理和歧视对健康及医疗保健系统造成的后果。
Lancet. 2022 Dec 10;400(10368):2137-2146. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01989-4.
7
Everyday capabilities were a path to resilience during COVID-19: a case study of five countries.日常能力是应对 COVID-19 期间韧性的途径:五个国家的案例研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Feb 13;38(2):192-204. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czac085.
8
Brazil's health system functionality amidst of the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of resilience.新冠疫情期间巴西卫生系统的功能:恢复力分析
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Jun;10:100222. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100222. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
9
On the brink of disruption: Applying Resilience Engineering to anticipate system performance under crisis.处于颠覆的边缘:应用韧性工程来预测危机下的系统性能。
Appl Ergon. 2022 Feb;99:103632. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103632. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
10
The institutional capacity of the Health Sector and the response to COVID-19 in a global perspective.从全球视角看卫生部门的机构能力及对新冠疫情的应对。
Cien Saude Colet. 2021 Oct;26(10):4645-4654. doi: 10.1590/1413-812320212610.11852021. Epub 2021 Jun 2.

论公共卫生领域复原力的认识论:变化世界中的新视角。

On the epistemology of resilience in public health: a novel perspective in a changing world.

作者信息

Jatobá Alessandro, Castro-Nunes Paula, Rodrigues de Carvalho Paulo Victor

机构信息

Centro de Estudos Estratégicos da Fiocruz Antônio Ivo de Carvalho, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

Front Health Serv. 2025 Jan 17;4:1453006. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1453006. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/frhs.2024.1453006
PMID:39897088
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11782274/
Abstract

This review proposes the foundations for an epistemology of resilience in public health, addressing the need for a theoretical framework to guide research and policy. Resilience, often ambiguously defined, is reexamined here as a critical attribute of public health systems, enabling them to adapt, absorb, and respond to routine and extraordinary demands without compromising universal and equitable service delivery. By integrating logical, sociological, historical, and philosophical perspectives, the paper delineates resilience as a structured and measurable concept, distinguishing it from common ambiguities in academic and policy discourse. It further introduces a set of foundational axioms to clarify the boundaries of resilience and support its operationalization within public health. These axioms emphasize the interplay between structural and functional dynamics, responses to internal and external stressors, and the importance of systems-level design over reliance on individual adaptations. This epistemological approach aims to bridge the gap between theory and practice, providing a robust basis for developing evidence-based policies that strengthen public health systems' ability to meet evolving challenges while promoting equity and universality.

摘要

本综述提出了公共卫生领域恢复力认识论的基础,满足了对指导研究和政策的理论框架的需求。恢复力,其定义常常模糊不清,在此被重新审视,作为公共卫生系统的一个关键属性,使它们能够适应、承受并应对常规和特殊需求,同时不损害普遍和公平的服务提供。通过整合逻辑、社会学、历史和哲学视角,本文将恢复力描绘为一个结构化且可衡量的概念,将其与学术和政策话语中的常见模糊之处区分开来。它进一步引入了一组基本公理,以阐明恢复力的边界,并支持其在公共卫生中的实际应用。这些公理强调结构与功能动态之间的相互作用、对内部和外部压力源的应对,以及系统层面设计相对于依赖个体适应的重要性。这种认识论方法旨在弥合理论与实践之间的差距,为制定基于证据的政策提供坚实基础,这些政策能够增强公共卫生系统应对不断演变的挑战的能力,同时促进公平性和普遍性。