Suppr超能文献

人类感染挑战实验:过去与现在。

Human Infection Challenge Experiments: Then and Now.

机构信息

Professor of medical ethics in medicine at Weill Cornell Medical College.

David and Lyn Silfen University Professor at the University of Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Ethics Hum Res. 2021 May;43(3):42-44. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500088. Epub 2021 Mar 15.

Abstract

In the midst of the Covid-19 pandemic, ethicists, researchers, and journalists have recommended studies that deliberately infect healthy volunteers with the coronavirus as a scientific means of expediting vaccine development. In this essay, we trace the history of infection challenge experiments and reflect on the Nuremberg Code of 1947, issued in response to brutal human experiments conducted by Nazi investigators in concentration camps. We argue that the Code continues to offer valuable guidance for assessing the ethics of this controversial form of research, with respect particularly to the acceptable limits to research risks and the social value of research necessary to justify exposing human participants to these risks.

摘要

在新冠疫情期间,伦理学家、研究人员和记者建议进行研究,即故意让健康志愿者感染冠状病毒,以此作为加速疫苗开发的科学手段。在本文中,我们追溯了感染挑战实验的历史,并反思了 1947 年纽伦堡法典,该法典是针对纳粹调查人员在集中营进行的残酷人体实验而发布的。我们认为,该法典仍然为评估这种有争议的研究形式的伦理问题提供了有价值的指导,特别是对于研究风险的可接受限度以及为了使人类参与者承担这些风险而进行研究的社会价值。

相似文献

1
Human Infection Challenge Experiments: Then and Now.人类感染挑战实验:过去与现在。
Ethics Hum Res. 2021 May;43(3):42-44. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500088. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
8
Nuremberg code turns 60.《纽伦堡法典》问世60周年。
Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Aug;85(8):573. doi: 10.2471/blt.07.045443.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验