• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
An evaluation of the experiences of young people in Patient and Public Involvement for palliative care research.对年轻人参与姑息治疗研究中患者及公众参与经历的评估。
Palliat Med. 2021 Apr;35(4):793-798. doi: 10.1177/0269216321999301. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
2
Reflective insights from developing a palliative care children and young people's advisory group.建立姑息治疗儿童及青少年咨询小组的反思见解
Palliat Med. 2021 Mar;35(3):621-624. doi: 10.1177/0269216320976035. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
3
Patient and public involvement in palliative care research: What works, and why? A qualitative evaluation.患者及公众参与姑息治疗研究:哪些措施有效,原因何在?一项定性评估。
Palliat Med. 2021 Jan;35(1):151-160. doi: 10.1177/0269216320956819. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
4
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
5
Achieving consensus on priority items for paediatric palliative care outcome measurement: Results from a modified Delphi survey, engagement with a children's research involvement group and expert item generation.达成儿科姑息治疗结局测量优先事项共识:一项改良 Delphi 调查、与儿童研究参与小组的互动以及专家项目生成的结果。
Palliat Med. 2023 Dec;37(10):1509-1519. doi: 10.1177/02692163231205126. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
6
The journey through care: study protocol for a longitudinal qualitative interview study to investigate the healthcare experiences and preferences of children and young people with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions and their families in the West Midlands, UK.关爱之旅:一项纵向定性访谈研究的研究方案,旨在调查英国西米德兰兹郡患有危及生命和有生命危险疾病的儿童、青少年及其家庭的医疗保健经历和偏好。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 21;8(1):e018266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018266.
7
Exploring the rewards and challenges of paediatric palliative care work - a qualitative study of a multi-disciplinary children's hospice care team.探索儿科姑息治疗工作的回报和挑战 - 多学科儿童临终关怀团队的定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Dec 16;16(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0254-4.
8
Using Palliative Care Needs Rounds in the UK for care home staff and residents: an implementation science study.在英国,使用姑息治疗需求评估小组为养老院工作人员和居民提供服务:一项实施科学研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(19):1-134. doi: 10.3310/KRWQ5829.
9
Development of a research-based classification of approaches to paediatric palliative medicine service provision within children's and young adults' hospices: A mixed methods study.基于研究的儿童姑息医学服务提供方法分类的制定:儿童和青年成人临终关怀机构的混合方法研究。
Palliat Med. 2022 May;36(5):855-865. doi: 10.1177/02692163221082423. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
10
Involving people with lived experience of homelessness in palliative and end of life care research: key considerations from experts in the field.让有过无家可归经历的人参与姑息治疗和临终关怀研究:该领域专家的关键考量因素
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jan 30;10(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00549-3.

引用本文的文献

1
The Importance of Lived Experience: A Scoping Review on the Value of Patient and Public Involvement in Health Research.生活经历的重要性:关于患者和公众参与健康研究价值的范围综述
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70205. doi: 10.1111/hex.70205.
2
Exploring Experiences and Designing Guidance for Involving and Engaging Children and Young People in James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnerships.探索让儿童和年轻人参与詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定伙伴关系的经验并设计相关指导
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70195. doi: 10.1111/hex.70195.
3
Evaluating parent and public involvement activities within a paediatric palliative care research centre: Route map to impactful and meaningful engagement.评估儿科姑息治疗研究中心中的家长和公众参与活动:实现有影响力和有意义的参与的路线图。
Palliat Med. 2024 Oct;38(9):1010-1020. doi: 10.1177/02692163241266374. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
4
'It's Powerful' The impact of involving children and young people in developing paediatric research agendas: A qualitative interview study.“很有影响力”——让儿童和青少年参与制定儿科研究议程的影响:一项定性访谈研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14028. doi: 10.1111/hex.14028.
5
A qualitative study exploring the benefits of involving young people in mental health research.一项探索让年轻人参与精神健康研究益处的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2023 Aug;26(4):1491-1504. doi: 10.1111/hex.13722. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
6
Developing a More Tailored Approach to Patient and Public Involvement with Children and Families in Pediatric Clinical Research: Lessons Learned.制定更具针对性的方法,让儿童和家庭参与儿科临床研究:经验教训。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Nov;56(6):948-963. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00382-4. Epub 2022 Feb 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient and public involvement in palliative care research: What works, and why? A qualitative evaluation.患者及公众参与姑息治疗研究:哪些措施有效,原因何在?一项定性评估。
Palliat Med. 2021 Jan;35(1):151-160. doi: 10.1177/0269216320956819. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
2
Patient and carer involvement in palliative care research: An integrative qualitative evidence synthesis review.患者和照护者在姑息治疗研究中的参与:综合定性证据综合评价综述。
Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;33(8):969-984. doi: 10.1177/0269216319858247. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
3
Evaluating patient and public involvement in research.评估患者及公众参与研究的情况。
BMJ. 2018 Dec 6;363:k5147. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k5147.
4
Impact of patient and public involvement on enrolment and retention in clinical trials: systematic review and meta-analysis.患者和公众参与对临床试验入组和保留的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2018 Nov 28;363:k4738. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4738.
5
Ethics and patient and public involvement with children and young people.伦理与儿童及青少年的患者和公众参与
Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2019 Aug;104(4):195-200. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313480. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
6
Specialist paediatric palliative care services: what are the benefits?儿科姑息治疗专科服务:有哪些好处?
Arch Dis Child. 2017 Oct;102(10):923-929. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-312026. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
7
Public and patient involvement in paediatric research.公众及患者参与儿科研究。
Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2016 Jun;101(3):158-61. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-309500. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
8
Young People's Experiences of Participation in Clinical Trials: Reasons for Taking Part.年轻人参与临床试验的体验:参与原因。
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(11):3-13. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1088974.
9
Parents' and young people's involvement in designing a trial of ventilator weaning.父母和年轻人参与呼吸机撤机试验的设计。
Nurs Crit Care. 2016 May;21(3):e10-8. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12221. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
10
Promoting an ethic of engagement in pediatric palliative care research.在儿科姑息治疗研究中倡导参与伦理。
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Oct 16;14:50. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0048-5.

对年轻人参与姑息治疗研究中患者及公众参与经历的评估。

An evaluation of the experiences of young people in Patient and Public Involvement for palliative care research.

作者信息

Mitchell Sarah J, Slowther Anne-Marie, Coad Jane, Khan Dena, Samani Mohini, Dale Jeremy

机构信息

Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2021 Apr;35(4):793-798. doi: 10.1177/0269216321999301. Epub 2021 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1177/0269216321999301
PMID:33726608
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8022075/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The active involvement of patients and the public in the design and conduct of research (Patient and Public Involvement) is important to add relevance and context. There are particular considerations for involving children and young people in research in potentially sensitive and emotional subject areas such as palliative care.

AIM

To evaluate the experiences of young people of Patient and Public Involvement for a paediatric palliative care research study.

DESIGN

Anonymous written feedback was collected from group members about their experiences of Patient and Public Involvement in a paediatric palliative care research study. An inductive thematic analysis of the feedback was conducted using NVivo.

SETTING / PARTICIPANTS: Young people aged 12-22 years who were members of existing advisory groups at a children's hospital, hospice and the clinical research network in the West Midlands, UK.

RESULTS

Feedback was provided by 30 young people at three meetings, held between December 2016 and February 2017. Three themes emerged: (1) Involvement: Young people have a desire to be involved in palliative care research, and recognise the importance of the subject area.(2) Impact: Researchers should demonstrate the impact of the involvement work on the research, by regularly providing feedback. (3) Learning: Opportunities to learn both about the topic and about research more widely were valued.

CONCLUSIONS

Young people want to be involved in palliative care research, and recognise its importance. A continuous relationship with the researcher throughout the study, with clear demonstration of the impact that their input has on the research plans, are important.

摘要

背景

患者和公众积极参与研究的设计与实施(患者及公众参与)对于增强研究的相关性和背景意义十分重要。在诸如姑息治疗等潜在敏感且涉及情感的主题领域让儿童和年轻人参与研究,存在一些特殊考量。

目的

评估年轻人参与一项儿科姑息治疗研究中患者及公众参与环节的体验。

设计

从小组成员处收集关于他们参与一项儿科姑息治疗研究中患者及公众参与环节体验的匿名书面反馈。使用NVivo软件对反馈进行归纳主题分析。

背景/参与者:年龄在12至22岁之间、身为英国西米德兰兹郡一家儿童医院、临终关怀机构及临床研究网络现有咨询小组成员的年轻人。

结果

2016年12月至2017年2月期间召开的三次会议上,30名年轻人提供了反馈。出现了三个主题:(1)参与:年轻人渴望参与姑息治疗研究,并认识到该主题领域的重要性。(2)影响:研究人员应通过定期提供反馈,展示参与工作对研究的影响。(3)学习:有机会更广泛地了解该主题及研究受到重视。

结论

年轻人希望参与姑息治疗研究,并认识到其重要性。在整个研究过程中与研究人员保持持续的关系,并清楚展示他们的投入对研究计划产生的影响,这很重要。