• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Outcomes of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for High-Density Renal Stone on Non-Contrast Computed Tomography.非增强计算机断层扫描下高密度肾结石的体外冲击波碎石术治疗效果
Cureus. 2021 Feb 10;13(2):e13271. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13271.
2
Role of computed tomography with no contrast medium enhancement in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary calculi.无造影剂增强计算机断层扫描在预测体外冲击波碎石术治疗尿路结石疗效中的作用
BJU Int. 2005 Jun;95(9):1285-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05520.x.
3
A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study.非增强计算机断层扫描(NCCT)上肾结石密度 970 亨氏单位(HU)的阈值可改善患者对体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)的选择:来自前瞻性研究的证据。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E438-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10964.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
4
Noncontrast computed tomography factors that predict the renal stone outcome after shock wave lithotripsy.预测冲击波碎石术后肾结石结局的非增强计算机断层扫描因素。
Clin Imaging. 2015 Sep-Oct;39(5):845-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
5
The success of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy based on the stone-attenuation value from non-contrast computed tomography.基于非增强计算机断层扫描的结石衰减值的体外冲击波碎石术的成功率。
Arab J Urol. 2014 Jun;12(2):155-61. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Feb 16.
6
Non-Contrast Computed Tomography Scan Based Parameters of Ureteric Stones Affecting the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy.基于非增强计算机断层扫描的输尿管结石参数对体外冲击波碎石术疗效的影响
Cureus. 2017 May 5;9(5):e1227. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1227.
7
Assessment of Hounsfield Units and Factors Associated with Fragmentation of Renal Stones by Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Computerized Tomography Study.体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石碎裂的 Hounsfield 单位评估及相关因素:一项计算机断层扫描研究。
Tomography. 2024 Jan 11;10(1):90-100. doi: 10.3390/tomography10010008.
8
Shock wave lithotripsy success for renal stones based on patient and stone computed tomography characteristics.基于患者和结石计算机断层扫描特征的肾结石冲击波碎石术成功率
Urology. 2007 Dec;70(6):1043-6; discussion 1046-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.074.
9
Can we successfully predict the outcome for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for medium size renal stones? A single-center experience.我们能否成功预测体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗中等大小肾结石的结果?单中心经验。
Urologia. 2022 May;89(2):235-239. doi: 10.1177/03915603211016355. Epub 2021 May 13.
10
Comparative analysis of renal calculi treatment via different extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) pathways.不同体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)途径治疗肾结石的对比分析。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Sep;56(9):2887-2895. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04025-5. Epub 2024 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Current state of AI for shockwave lithotripsy: a systematic review from YAU and EAU endourology.冲击波碎石术人工智能的现状:来自YAU和EAU腔内泌尿外科的系统评价
World J Urol. 2025 Jul 11;43(1):429. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05830-y.
2
Efficacy of music therapy for pain control of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.音乐疗法对体外冲击波碎石术疼痛控制效果的Meta 分析:随机对照研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 May 31;103(22):e38182. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038182.
3
Importance of precise imaging for stone identification during shockwave lithotripsy: a critical evaluation of "OptiVision" as a post-processing radiography imaging modality.精确成像在冲击波碎石术中对结石识别的重要性:“OptiVision”后处理射线照相成像方式的批判性评价。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Feb;50(1):87-93. doi: 10.1007/s00240-021-01284-0. Epub 2021 Sep 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Frequency of Blood Transfusion in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜取石术中输血频率
Cureus. 2020 Oct 21;12(10):e11086. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11086.
2
Stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography predicts for stone fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy.计算机断层扫描上的结石衰减和皮肤到结石的距离可预测冲击波碎石术导致的结石破碎情况。
Urology. 2008 Oct;72(4):765-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.05.046. Epub 2008 Jul 31.
3
Optimizing shock wave lithotripsy in the 21st century.21世纪冲击波碎石术的优化
Eur Urol. 2007 Aug;52(2):344-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.066. Epub 2007 May 2.
4
A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography.体外冲击波碎石术预测结石碎裂相关因素的前瞻性多变量分析:高分辨率非增强计算机断层扫描的价值
Eur Urol. 2007 Jun;51(6):1688-93; discussion 1693-4. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.048. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
5
Diabetes mellitus and hypertension associated with shock wave lithotripsy of renal and proximal ureteral stones at 19 years of followup.随访19年发现,糖尿病和高血压与肾及输尿管上段结石的冲击波碎石术有关。
J Urol. 2006 May;175(5):1742-7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00989-4.
6
Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography.通过计算机断层扫描上的皮肤到结石距离确定冲击波碎石术的成功率。
Urology. 2005 Nov;66(5):941-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.05.011.
7
Role of computed tomography with no contrast medium enhancement in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary calculi.无造影剂增强计算机断层扫描在预测体外冲击波碎石术治疗尿路结石疗效中的作用
BJU Int. 2005 Jun;95(9):1285-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05520.x.
8
Comparison of 2 generations of piezoelectric lithotriptors using matched pair analysis.使用配对分析比较两代压电碎石机。
J Urol. 2004 Nov;172(5 Pt 1):1887-91. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000142730.60583.7a.
9
Present-day imaging of patients with renal colic.目前对肾绞痛患者的影像学检查
Eur Radiol. 2001;11(1):4-17. doi: 10.1007/s003300000589.
10
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of 2000 urinary calculi with the modulith SL-20: success and failure according to size and location of stones.使用SL - 20型体外冲击波碎石机对2000例尿路结石进行体外冲击波碎石术:根据结石大小和位置分析成功率与失败率
J Endourol. 2000 Apr;14(3):239-46. doi: 10.1089/end.2000.14.239.

非增强计算机断层扫描下高密度肾结石的体外冲击波碎石术治疗效果

The Outcomes of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for High-Density Renal Stone on Non-Contrast Computed Tomography.

作者信息

Ullah Sami, Muhammad Syed Razi, Farooque Rizwan, Farooque Umar, Farukhuddin Fnu, Bin Zafar Muhammad Daim, Khadke Chinmay, Usman Ahmad, Perez Julio, Shehata Mostafa A

机构信息

Urology, Muhammad Medical College, Mirpur Khas, PAK.

Internal Medicine, Sindh Medical College, Karachi, PAK.

出版信息

Cureus. 2021 Feb 10;13(2):e13271. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13271.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.13271
PMID:33728206
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7949630/
Abstract

Introduction Urinary lithiasis is usually managed by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). Patients are examined using non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) in order to evaluate the feasibility of ESWL, according to where the stone is located and how big is its size. The objective of this study is to determine the outcomes of ESWL in patients having high-density renal stone, evaluated using NCCT. Materials and methods A descriptive case series study was conducted in the Department of Urology, Sindh Institute of Urology & Transplantation, Karachi for six months. Patients of either gender aged between 25-50 years, who presented with solitary renal and ureteric calculi of 0.5-2 cm in diameter and high-density renal stones [>750 hounsfield units (HU)] were enrolled. ESWL was performed and a satisfactory outcome was defined as complete stone clearance in less than or equal to three ESWL sessions. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was used to analyze frequencies and percentages of the number of ESWL sessions, complete renal stone clearances, and satisfactory outcomes at the end of 12 weeks. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results The mean age of the patient was reported to be 34.08 ± 9.53 years. 51.6% male preponderance was noticed. Renal and ureteric stones were found in 69.7% and 30.3% of patients, respectively. 21.3% of patients showed stone clearance after two ESWL sessions, 27% of patients after three ESWL sessions, and 51.6% of patients after four ESWL sessions. Stone clearance was found in 58.2% of patients and a satisfactory outcome was found in 42.6% of patients. Conclusions Our results signify a satisfactory outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for high-density renal stone on non-contrast computed tomography. Further studies on a larger scale are needed to validate these results.

摘要

引言

尿石症通常采用体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)进行治疗。根据结石的位置和大小,患者需接受非增强计算机断层扫描(NCCT)检查,以评估ESWL治疗的可行性。本研究的目的是确定经NCCT评估的高密度肾结石患者接受ESWL治疗的效果。

材料与方法

在卡拉奇信德泌尿与移植研究所泌尿外科进行了为期六个月的描述性病例系列研究。纳入年龄在25至50岁之间、患有直径0.5至2厘米的孤立性肾和输尿管结石以及高密度肾结石[>750亨氏单位(HU)]的患者,无论性别。进行了ESWL治疗,将满意的结果定义为在小于或等于三次ESWL治疗后结石完全清除。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)(IBM公司,纽约州阿蒙克)分析ESWL治疗次数、肾结石完全清除率和12周结束时满意结果的频率和百分比。p值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

据报告,患者的平均年龄为34.08±9.53岁。发现男性占优势,比例为51.6%。分别有69.7%和30.3%的患者发现肾和输尿管结石。21.3%的患者在两次ESWL治疗后结石清除,27%的患者在三次ESWL治疗后结石清除,51.6%的患者在四次ESWL治疗后结石清除。58.2%的患者结石清除,42.6%的患者获得满意结果。

结论

我们的结果表明,非增强计算机断层扫描显示的高密度肾结石患者接受体外冲击波碎石术的效果令人满意。需要进行更大规模的进一步研究来验证这些结果。