Talyshinskii Ali, Juliebø-Jones Patrick, Tzelves Lazaros, Naik Nithesh, Nedbal Carlotta, Keulimzhayev Nurbol, Panthier Frédéric, Pietropaolo Amelia, Somani Bhaskar Kumar
Department of Urology and Andrology, Astana Medical University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
World J Urol. 2025 Jul 11;43(1):429. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05830-y.
To consolidate the current evidence of artificial intelligence (AI) for management of nephrolithiasis using extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL), and to look at its feasibility into integration in clinical practice.
In March 2025, the sytematic search was conducted across several databases, including, PubMed, Google Scholar, ACM Digital Library, CINAHL, and IEEE Xplore via Boolean operators with the use of the dedicated terms. Studies that described the development and validation and/or testing of AI-based models for ESWL, regardless of clinical scenario, published in English were included.
17 studies met the inclusion criteria. These were grouped based on their primary application into two key scenarios: outcomes prediction (n = 14) and intraoperative assistance (n = 3). Despite promising results, many studies used meaningfully different methodologies to develop AI-based models, especially different baseline inputs. Moreover, many studies present mutually exclusive information, as illustrated by the use of body mass index (BMI) as input. Finally, many studies are presented as single center studies or without external testing, which reduces the likelihood of generalizability of the resulting accuracy metrics.
There is increasing evidence of the role of AI in predicting ESWL outcomes and assisting during the procedure, often outperforming traditional statistical models. More prospective multi-institutional studies need to be done with standardized parameters and external validation to fully integrate AI in the management of ESWL.
整合目前关于人工智能(AI)用于体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗肾结石的证据,并探讨其在临床实践中整合的可行性。
2025年3月,通过布尔运算符使用特定术语在多个数据库中进行系统检索,包括PubMed、谷歌学术、ACM数字图书馆、CINAHL和IEEE Xplore。纳入以英文发表的描述基于AI的ESWL模型开发、验证和/或测试的研究,无论临床场景如何。
17项研究符合纳入标准。根据其主要应用分为两个关键场景:结果预测(n = 14)和术中辅助(n = 3)。尽管结果令人鼓舞,但许多研究在开发基于AI的模型时使用了截然不同的方法,尤其是不同的基线输入。此外,许多研究提供了相互矛盾的信息,以体重指数(BMI)作为输入为例。最后,许多研究是单中心研究或没有外部测试,这降低了所得准确性指标可推广的可能性。
越来越多的证据表明AI在预测ESWL结果和术中辅助方面的作用,其表现往往优于传统统计模型。需要进行更多具有标准化参数和外部验证的前瞻性多机构研究,以将AI完全整合到ESWL的管理中。