• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19 封锁措施和人口统计学相关的谷歌趋势:跨国分析。

COVID-19 lockdowns and demographically-relevant Google Trends: A cross-national analysis.

机构信息

University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.

Institut national d'études démographiques (Ined), Paris, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 17;16(3):e0248072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248072. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0248072
PMID:33730055
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7968661/
Abstract

The spread of COVID-19 and resulting local and national lockdowns have a host of potential consequences for demographic trends. While impacts on mortality and, to some extent, short-term migration flows are beginning to be documented, it is too early to measure actual consequences for family demography. To gain insight into potential future consequences of the lockdown for family demography, we use cross-national Google Trends search data to explore whether trends in searches for words related to fertility, relationship formation, and relationship dissolution changed following lockdowns compared to average, pre-lockdown levels in Europe and the United States. Because lockdowns were not widely anticipated or simultaneous in timing or intensity, we exploit variability over time and between countries (and U.S. states). We use a panel event-study design and difference-in-differences methods, and account for seasonal trends and average country-level (or state-level) differences in searches. We find statistically significant impacts of lockdown timing on changes in searches for terms such as wedding and those related to condom use, emergency contraception, pregnancy tests, and abortion, but little evidence of changes in searches related to fertility. Impacts for union formation and dissolution tended to only be statistically significant at the start of a lockdown with a return to average-levels about 2 to 3 months after lockdown initiation, particularly in Europe. Compared to Europe, returns to average search levels were less evident for the U.S., even 2 to 3 months after lockdowns were introduced. This may be due to the fact, in the U.S., health and social policy responses were less demarcated than in Europe, such that economic uncertainty was likely of larger magnitude. Such pandemic-related economic uncertainty may therefore have the potential to slightly increase already existing polarization in family formation behaviours in the U.S. Alongside contributing to the wider literature on economic uncertainty and family behaviors, this paper also proposes strategies for efficient use of Google Trends data, such as making relative comparisons and testing sensitivity to outliers, and provides a template and cautions for their use in demographic research when actual demographic trends data are not yet available.

摘要

COVID-19 的传播以及由此导致的当地和全国性封锁对人口趋势有一系列潜在影响。虽然死亡率的影响以及在一定程度上短期移民流动的影响开始被记录下来,但要衡量封锁对家庭人口统计学的实际影响还为时过早。为了深入了解封锁对家庭人口统计学的潜在未来影响,我们使用跨国谷歌趋势搜索数据来探讨与生育、关系形成和关系解体相关的词汇搜索趋势在封锁后是否与欧洲和美国的平均、封锁前水平发生了变化。由于封锁的时间、强度或同时性没有被广泛预期,我们利用了时间和国家(以及美国各州)之间的可变性。我们使用面板事件研究设计和差分差异方法,并考虑了季节性趋势以及国家(或州)层面的搜索平均差异。我们发现,封锁时间对婚礼和与避孕套使用、紧急避孕、怀孕测试和堕胎相关的术语搜索的变化有统计学上的显著影响,但几乎没有证据表明与生育相关的搜索发生了变化。在封锁开始时,对联盟形成和解体的影响往往只有统计学意义,大约在封锁开始后 2 到 3 个月才能恢复到平均水平,特别是在欧洲。与欧洲相比,美国的搜索水平恢复到平均水平的情况不太明显,即使在封锁开始后 2 到 3 个月也是如此。这可能是因为在美国,卫生和社会政策的反应不如欧洲明确,因此经济不确定性可能更大。因此,这种与大流行相关的经济不确定性可能会略微增加美国已经存在的家庭形成行为两极分化。除了为经济不确定性和家庭行为的更广泛文献做出贡献外,本文还提出了有效利用谷歌趋势数据的策略,例如进行相对比较和测试对异常值的敏感性,并提供了一个模板和在实际人口趋势数据不可用时用于人口研究的注意事项。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8024/7968661/02e57693e07d/pone.0248072.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8024/7968661/814950ff76b6/pone.0248072.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8024/7968661/9dc24db8f194/pone.0248072.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8024/7968661/58883cb3fd54/pone.0248072.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8024/7968661/7dfb759ef594/pone.0248072.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8024/7968661/42ff2eac832f/pone.0248072.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8024/7968661/272e9573be08/pone.0248072.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8024/7968661/02e57693e07d/pone.0248072.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8024/7968661/814950ff76b6/pone.0248072.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8024/7968661/9dc24db8f194/pone.0248072.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8024/7968661/58883cb3fd54/pone.0248072.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8024/7968661/7dfb759ef594/pone.0248072.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8024/7968661/42ff2eac832f/pone.0248072.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8024/7968661/272e9573be08/pone.0248072.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8024/7968661/02e57693e07d/pone.0248072.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
COVID-19 lockdowns and demographically-relevant Google Trends: A cross-national analysis.COVID-19 封锁措施和人口统计学相关的谷歌趋势:跨国分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 17;16(3):e0248072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248072. eCollection 2021.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Effects of the COVID-19 Emergency and National Lockdown on Italian Citizens' Economic Concerns, Government Trust, and Health Engagement: Evidence From a Two-Wave Panel Study.COVID-19 紧急状态和全国封锁对意大利公民经济担忧、政府信任和健康参与的影响:来自两轮面板研究的证据。
Milbank Q. 2021 Jun;99(2):369-392. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12506. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
4
Association of lockdowns with the protective role of ultraviolet-B (UVB) radiation in reducing COVID-19 deaths.锁定与紫外线 B(UVB)辐射在减少 COVID-19 死亡中的保护作用之间的关联。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 24;11(1):22851. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01908-w.
5
Eastern Europe: pronatalist policies and private behavior.东欧:鼓励生育政策与个人行为
Popul Bull. 1982 Feb;36(6):1-49.
6
COVID-19 blues: Lockdowns and mental health-related google searches in Latin America.新冠疫情引发的忧郁情绪:拉丁美洲的封锁措施与心理健康相关的谷歌搜索情况
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jul;281:114040. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114040. Epub 2021 May 25.
7
Information-Seeking Patterns During the COVID-19 Pandemic Across the United States: Longitudinal Analysis of Google Trends Data.美国新冠疫情期间的信息寻求模式:谷歌趋势数据的纵向分析
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 3;23(5):e22933. doi: 10.2196/22933.
8
COVID-related "lockdowns" and birth rates in New York.纽约的新冠疫情相关“封锁”与出生率。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Nov;3(6):100476. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100476. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
9
Hangover-Related Internet Searches Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in England: Observational Study.英国新冠疫情期间及之前与宿醉相关的网络搜索:观察性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Mar 3;7:e40518. doi: 10.2196/40518.
10
Analysis of the Lockdown Effects on the Economy, Environment, and COVID-19 Spread: Lesson Learnt from a Global Pandemic in 2020.分析封锁对经济、环境和 COVID-19 传播的影响:从 2020 年全球大流行中吸取的教训。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 8;19(19):12868. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912868.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of public health shocks on fertility intentions: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic in China.公共卫生冲击对生育意愿的影响:来自中国新冠疫情的证据。
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 18;13:1631821. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1631821. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 on Fertility: An Integrative Review.2019冠状病毒病对生育力的影响:一项综合综述
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2025 May;40(3):765-775. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3908. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
3
Decline in and recovery of fertility rates after COVID-19-related state of emergency in Japan.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the effects of Covid-19 through a life course lens.从生命历程的角度理解新冠疫情的影响。
Adv Life Course Res. 2020 Sep;45:100360. doi: 10.1016/j.alcr.2020.100360. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
2
Determinants of Family Stress and Domestic Violence: Lessons from the COVID-19 Outbreak.家庭压力与家庭暴力的决定因素:来自新冠疫情爆发的教训
Can Public Policy. 2021 Sep 1;47(3):439-459. doi: 10.3138/cpp.2020-119.
3
Intimate partner violence under forced cohabitation and economic stress: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic.强迫同居和经济压力下的亲密伴侣暴力行为:来自新冠疫情的证据
日本因新冠疫情而宣布进入紧急状态后,生育率下降和复苏。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 8;14(10):e087657. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087657.
4
Self-reported condom use among Washington State residents prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional analysis of BRFSS data.华盛顿州居民在 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间自我报告的避孕套使用情况:对 BRFSS 数据的横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 20;13(12):e075877. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075877.
5
The evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic through the lens of google searches.从谷歌搜索的角度看 COVID-19 大流行的演变。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 13;13(1):19843. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41675-4.
6
The COVID-19 baby bump in the United States.美国的 COVID-19 婴儿潮。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Aug 22;120(34):e2222075120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2222075120. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
7
The relationship between staying at home during the pandemic and the number of conceptions: A national panel data analysis.疫情期间居家与受孕数量之间的关系:一项全国面板数据分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 11;18(8):e0289604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289604. eCollection 2023.
8
School closures and well-being-related topic searches on Google during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲地区 COVID-19 大流行期间学校关闭和与健康相关话题在谷歌上的搜索情况。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 27;23(1):1248. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16186-6.
9
The Impact of Health Coverage, Race and Ethnicity on Utilization of Preventive Medical Care during the First Year of the Covid-19 Pandemic: Findings from the National Health Interview Survey 2019-2020.《新冠疫情大流行第一年中,医保覆盖、种族和民族对预防性医疗保健利用的影响:来自 2019-2020 年全国健康访谈调查的发现》。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Apr;11(2):643-651. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01549-x. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
10
Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on contraception use in France.2019 冠状病毒病对法国避孕措施使用的影响。
Therapie. 2023 Sep-Oct;78(5):593-603. doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2023.01.002. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
J Public Econ. 2021 Feb;194:104350. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104350. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
4
Disease and fertility: Evidence from the 1918-19 influenza pandemic in Sweden.疾病与生育:来自瑞典 1918-1919 年流感大流行的证据。
Econ Hum Biol. 2021 Dec;43:101020. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2021.101020. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
5
A literature review of the economics of COVID-19.关于2019冠状病毒病经济学的文献综述。
J Econ Surv. 2021 Sep;35(4):1007-1044. doi: 10.1111/joes.12423. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
6
Behaviours and attitudes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from a cross-national Facebook survey.应对新冠疫情的行为与态度:一项跨国脸书调查的见解
EPJ Data Sci. 2021;10(1):17. doi: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-021-00270-1. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
7
Parental well-being in times of Covid-19 in Germany.德国新冠疫情期间父母的幸福状况。
Rev Econ Househ. 2021;19(1):91-122. doi: 10.1007/s11150-020-09529-4. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
8
Working parents, financial insecurity, and childcare: mental health in the time of COVID-19 in the UK.在职父母、经济不安全与儿童保育:英国新冠疫情期间的心理健康
Rev Econ Househ. 2021;19(1):123-144. doi: 10.1007/s11150-020-09538-3. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
9
The Immediate Effect of COVID-19 Policies on Social-Distancing Behavior in the United States.《新冠疫情政策对美国社交隔离行为的即时影响》
Public Health Rep. 2021 Mar-Apr;136(2):245-252. doi: 10.1177/0033354920976575. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
10
COVID-19, lockdowns and well-being: Evidence from Google Trends.新冠疫情、封锁措施与幸福感:来自谷歌趋势的证据
J Public Econ. 2021 Jan;193:104346. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104346. Epub 2020 Nov 30.