Inglis Erin Calaine, Iannetta Danilo, Murias Juan M
Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, KNB 434, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 Jul;121(7):1921-1931. doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04623-6. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
This study evaluated (i) the relationship between oxygen uptake (O) kinetics and maximal O (O) within groups differing in fitness status, and (ii) the adjustment of O kinetics compared to that of central [cardiac output (Q̇), heart rate (HR)] and peripheral (deoxyhemoglobin over O ratio ([HHb]/O)] O delivery, during step-transitions to moderate-intensity exercise.
Thirty-six young healthy male participants (18 untrained; 18 trained) performed a ramp-incremental test to exhaustion and 3 step-transitions to moderate-intensity exercise. Q̇ and HR kinetics were measured in 18 participants (9 untrained; 9 trained).
No significant correlation between τ̇O and O was found in trained participants (r = 0.29; p > 0.05) whereas a significant negative correlation was found in untrained (r = - 0.58; p < 0.05) and all participants (r = - 0.82; p < 0.05). τQ̇ (18.8 ± 5.5 s) and τHR (20.1 ± 6.2 s) were significantly greater than τO (13.9 ± 2.7 s) for trained (p < 0.05). No differences were found between τQ̇ (22.8 ± 8.45 s), τHR (21.2 ± 8.3 s) and τO (28.9 ± 5.7 s) for untrained (p > 0.05). τQ̇ demonstrated a significant strong positive correlation with τHR in trained (r = 0.76; p < 0.05) but not untrained (r = 0.61; p > 0.05). A significant overshoot in the [HHb]/O ratio was found in the untrained groups (p < 0.05) but not in the trained groups (p > 0.05) CONCLUSION: The results indicated that when comparing participants of different fitness status (i) there is a point at which greater V̇O values are not accompanied by faster O kinetics; (ii) central delivery of O does not seem to limit the kinetics of O; and (iii) O delivery within the active tissues might contribute to the slower O kinetics response in untrained participants.
本研究评估了(i)在健康状况不同的组中,摄氧量(O)动力学与最大摄氧量(O)之间的关系,以及(ii)在向中等强度运动的阶跃过渡过程中,与中心[心输出量(Q̇)、心率(HR)]和外周(脱氧血红蛋白与氧比值[HHb]/O)]氧输送相比,O动力学的调整情况。
36名年轻健康男性参与者(18名未受过训练者;18名受过训练者)进行了递增负荷运动试验直至力竭,并进行了3次向中等强度运动的阶跃过渡。在18名参与者(9名未受过训练者;9名受过训练者)中测量了Q̇和HR动力学。
在受过训练的参与者中,未发现τ̇O与O之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.29;p > 0.05),而在未受过训练的参与者中发现显著负相关(r = -0.58;p < 0.05),在所有参与者中也发现显著负相关(r = -0.82;p < 0.05)。对于受过训练的参与者,τQ̇(18.8 ± 5.5秒)和τHR(20.1 ± 6.2秒)显著大于τO(13.9 ± 2.7秒)(p < 0.05)。对于未受过训练的参与者,τQ̇(22.8 ± 8.45秒)、τHR(21.2 ± 8.3秒)和τO(28.9 ± 5.7秒)之间未发现差异(p > 0.05)。在受过训练的参与者中,τQ̇与τHR之间显示出显著的强正相关(r = 0.76;p < 0.05),而在未受过训练的参与者中未发现(r = 0.61;p > 0.05)。在未受过训练的组中发现[HHb]/O比值存在显著过冲(p < 0.05),而在受过训练的组中未发现(p > 0.05)。结论:结果表明,在比较不同健康状况的参与者时,(i)存在这样一个点,即更高的V̇O值并不伴随着更快的O动力学;(ii)中心氧输送似乎不会限制O的动力学;(iii)活跃组织内的氧输送可能导致未受过训练的参与者中O动力学反应较慢。