APHP, Paul Brousse Hospital, Department of Psychiatry and Addictology, F-94800, Villejuif, France; Unité Psychiatrie-Comorbidités-Addictions- Unité de Recherche PSYCOMADD 4872 Université Paris Sud- APHP, Université Paris Saclay, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.
APHP, Paul Brousse Hospital, Department of Psychiatry and Addictology, F-94800, Villejuif, France; Unité Psychiatrie-Comorbidités-Addictions- Unité de Recherche PSYCOMADD 4872 Université Paris Sud- APHP, Université Paris Saclay, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 May;137:273-282. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.03.002. Epub 2021 Mar 7.
The use of psychedelic treatments has shown very promising results in some psychiatric and addictive disorders, but not all patients achieved a response.
The aim of this review is to explore the clinical and biological factors which could predict the response to psychedelics in psychiatric and addictive disorders.
A systematic research was performed on MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Web of science, and Scopus databases from January 1990 to May 2020. All studies investigating the predictive factors of response to psychedelics regardless of psychiatric or addictive disorders, were included.
Twenty studies investigating addictive disorder, treatment-resistant depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder and depressive and anxiety symptoms in patients with life-threatening cancer were included in this review. We found that, in all indications, the main predictive factor of response to psychedelics is the intensity of the acute psychedelic experience. Indeed, we found this factor for alcohol and tobacco use disorders, treatment-resistant depression, and anxiety and depressive symptoms in patients with life-threatening cancer, but not for obsessive-compulsive disorder.
The intensity of the acute psychedelic experience was the main predicting factor of response. The action mechanism of this experience was not clear, but some hypotheses could be made, such as a modulation of serotoninergic system by 5-HT2A receptors agonism, a modulation of the default mode network (DMN) with an acute modular disintegration of the DMN followed by a re-integration of this network with a normal functioning, or an anti-inflammatory effect of this treatment.
迷幻药物治疗在一些精神和成瘾障碍中显示出非常有前景的结果,但并非所有患者都有反应。
本综述旨在探讨可预测精神和成瘾障碍中迷幻药物反应的临床和生物学因素。
对 MEDLINE、PsycInfo、Web of science 和 Scopus 数据库进行了系统的检索,检索时间从 1990 年 1 月至 2020 年 5 月。纳入了所有调查迷幻药物反应预测因素的研究,无论精神障碍还是成瘾障碍。
本综述纳入了 20 项研究,涉及成瘾障碍、治疗抵抗性抑郁症、强迫症和有生命威胁的癌症患者的抑郁和焦虑症状。我们发现,在所有适应证中,对迷幻药物反应的主要预测因素是急性迷幻体验的强度。事实上,我们在酒精和烟草使用障碍、治疗抵抗性抑郁症以及有生命威胁的癌症患者的焦虑和抑郁症状中发现了这一因素,但在强迫症中没有发现。
急性迷幻体验的强度是反应的主要预测因素。这种体验的作用机制尚不清楚,但可以提出一些假设,如 5-HT2A 受体激动剂对血清素能系统的调节、默认模式网络(DMN)的急性模块化解耦,随后 DMN 重新整合为正常功能,或这种治疗的抗炎作用。