Ashe Maureen C, Santos Isis Kelly Dos, Edward Nicola Y, Burnett Laura A, Barnes Rosanne, Fleig Lena, Puyat Joseph H, Sale Joanna E M, McKay Heather A, Giangregorio Lora M
Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Department of Family Practice, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
J Bone Metab. 2021 Feb;28(1):27-39. doi: 10.11005/jbm.2021.28.1.27. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
Research on osteoporosis and physical activity often focuses on women. We aimed to conduct a systematic review to assess the benefits and harms of physical activity interventions for men's bone health.
We used standard methods and searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (duration, ≥6 months) published in all languages across multiple databases and trial registries. The last search was conducted on July 22, 2020.
We included 11 studies (14 publications), resulting in a sample of N=723 men (range, 17-132 participants). We found low-certainty evidence that physical activity has little influence on the areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at the total hip (5 RCTs, N=324; mean difference [MD], 0.03 [95 confidence interval (CI), 0.01 to 0.05]) and little or no influence on the aBMD at the femoral neck (3 RCTs, N=186; MD, 0.00 [95% CI, -0.04 to 0.04]), lumbar spine (3 RCTs; N=213; MD, 0.05 [95% CI, -0.01 to 0.11]), and whole body (4 RCTs, N=203; MD, -0.00 [95% CI, -0.03 to 0.02]).
We found low-certainty evidence that physical activity (≥6 months) has some effect on the total hip in men, but new evidence may change this finding. This review highlights the gap in the evidence on specific intervention prescriptions that can benefit the bone geometry, structure, microarchitecture, and, ultimately, bone strength in men. Future research should engage in comprehensive reporting of harms, quality of life outcomes, advanced imaging findings, and long-term interventions.
关于骨质疏松症与身体活动的研究通常聚焦于女性。我们旨在进行一项系统评价,以评估身体活动干预对男性骨骼健康的益处和危害。
我们采用标准方法,在多个数据库和试验注册库中检索了所有语言发表的随机对照试验(RCT)(持续时间≥6个月)。最后一次检索于2020年7月22日进行。
我们纳入了11项研究(14篇出版物),样本量为N = 723名男性(范围为17 - 132名参与者)。我们发现,证据确定性较低,身体活动对全髋部的面积骨密度(aBMD)影响较小(5项RCT,N = 324;平均差值[MD],0.03[95%置信区间(CI),0.01至0.05]),对股骨颈的aBMD影响很小或无影响(3项RCT,N = 186;MD,0.00[95%CI,-0.04至0.04]),对腰椎的aBMD影响很小或无影响(3项RCT;N = 213;MD,0.05[95%CI,-0.01至0.11]),对全身的aBMD影响很小或无影响(4项RCT,N = 203;MD,-0.00[95%CI,-0.03至0.02])。
我们发现,证据确定性较低,身体活动(≥6个月)对男性全髋部有一定影响,但新的证据可能会改变这一发现。本综述凸显了在特定干预处方证据方面的差距,这些处方可能有益于男性的骨骼几何形状、结构、微结构,并最终有益于骨骼强度。未来的研究应全面报告危害、生活质量结果、先进影像学发现和长期干预措施。