Hamrick Sally A, Richling Sarah M, Davis William T, Rapp John T, Longino Emily B, Kimber Peta, Brogan Kristen M, Law Stuart M
Department of Psychology, Auburn University, 226 Thach Hall, Auburn, AL 36849-5214 USA.
University of Nevada, Reno, NV USA.
Behav Anal Pract. 2020 Nov 10;14(1):110-119. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00496-x. eCollection 2021 Mar.
Previous research has evaluated the effects of various commonly used mastery criteria on skill maintenance by directly manipulating the accuracy requirement, as well as the sessions across which these accuracy levels must be demonstrated. The current study extends this literature by including a rate dimension within the mastery criterion with a unique population. We implemented a fluency-oriented treatment package to increase intraverbal skills related to state sex laws using a multiple-baseline design across 3 target sets for 2 individuals adjudicated for illegal sexual behavior. Within this intervention package, we included 2 distinct components of a single mastery criterion: (a) accuracy (i.e., 100% accuracy across 3 consecutive sessions) and (b) speed. We evaluated how each of these measurable dimensions of behavior maintained across time. Results indicate this mastery criterion produced over 80% accuracy during maintenance probes for 10 weeks across all sets for both students. However, this mastery criterion produced idiosyncratic maintenance of rates across students and sets. These results suggest that each of these dimensions of behavior does not necessarily covary and should be conceptualized as distinct clinical targets by applied behavior clinicians.
以往的研究通过直接操纵准确性要求以及必须证明这些准确性水平的会话次数,评估了各种常用掌握标准对技能保持的影响。本研究通过在掌握标准中纳入速率维度并针对特定人群,扩展了这一文献。我们实施了一个以流畅性为导向的治疗方案,使用多基线设计,针对2名因非法性行为被裁决的个体的3个目标集,提高与州性法律相关的口语文本复述技能。在这个干预方案中,我们纳入了单一掌握标准的2个不同组成部分:(a)准确性(即连续3个会话的准确率达到100%)和(b)速度。我们评估了行为的这些可测量维度如何随时间保持。结果表明,在为期10周的维持测试期间,该掌握标准在两名学生的所有目标集上都产生了超过80%的准确率。然而,该掌握标准在不同学生和目标集之间产生了独特的速率保持情况。这些结果表明,行为的这些维度不一定相互关联,应用行为临床医生应将其概念化为不同的临床目标。