• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

操纵与恶意个性化:探究社交媒体上欺骗性攻击者利用的自我披露偏差

Manipulation and Malicious Personalization: Exploring the Self-Disclosure Biases Exploited by Deceptive Attackers on Social Media.

作者信息

Aïmeur Esma, Díaz Ferreyra Nicolás, Hage Hicham

机构信息

Department of Computer Science and Operations Research (DIRO), University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Research Training Group "User-Centred Social Media" University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.

出版信息

Front Artif Intell. 2019 Nov 29;2:26. doi: 10.3389/frai.2019.00026. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/frai.2019.00026
PMID:33733115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7861322/
Abstract

In the real world, the disclosure of private information to others often occurs after a trustworthy relationship has been established. Conversely, users of Social Network Sites (SNSs) like Facebook or Instagram often disclose large amounts of personal information prematurely to individuals which are not necessarily trustworthy. Such a low privacy-preserving behavior is often exploited by deceptive attackers with harmful intentions. Basically, deceivers approach their victims in online communities using incentives that motivate them to share their private information, and ultimately, their credentials. Since motivations, such as financial or social gain vary from individual to individual, deceivers must wisely choose their incentive strategy to mislead the users. Consequently, attacks are crafted to each victim based on their particular information-sharing motivations. This work analyses, through an online survey, those motivations and cognitive biases which are frequently exploited by deceptive attackers in SNSs. We propose thereafter some countermeasures for each of these biases to provide personalized privacy protection against deceivers.

摘要

在现实世界中,向他人披露私人信息通常是在建立了可信赖的关系之后才会发生。相反,像脸书或照片墙这样的社交网站用户常常过早地向不一定值得信赖的个人披露大量个人信息。这种低隐私保护行为常常被怀有恶意的欺骗性攻击者利用。基本上,欺骗者在在线社区中接近他们的受害者时会利用一些激励手段,促使受害者分享他们的私人信息,最终分享他们的凭证。由于诸如经济利益或社会收益等动机因人而异,欺骗者必须明智地选择他们的激励策略来误导用户。因此,针对每个受害者,攻击都是根据他们特定的信息共享动机精心策划的。这项工作通过在线调查分析了社交网站中欺骗性攻击者经常利用的那些动机和认知偏差。此后,我们针对这些偏差中的每一种提出了一些对策,以提供针对欺骗者的个性化隐私保护。

相似文献

1
Manipulation and Malicious Personalization: Exploring the Self-Disclosure Biases Exploited by Deceptive Attackers on Social Media.操纵与恶意个性化:探究社交媒体上欺骗性攻击者利用的自我披露偏差
Front Artif Intell. 2019 Nov 29;2:26. doi: 10.3389/frai.2019.00026. eCollection 2019.
2
UISTD: A Trust-Aware Model for Diverse Item Personalization in Social Sensing with Lower Privacy Intrusion.UISTD:一种在社交感知中具有较低隐私入侵的、多样化项目个性化的信任感知模型。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Dec 11;18(12):4383. doi: 10.3390/s18124383.
3
: Antecedents of Self-Disclosure across Different Social Networking Sites.不同社交网站上自我表露的前因
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2022 Sep 1;12(9):1257-1271. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe12090087.
4
Motivation Scale for Using Social Network Sites: Comparative Study between Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat and LinkedIn.社交网站使用动机量表:脸书、照片墙、推特、阅后即焚和领英之间的比较研究
Psychol Belg. 2023 Apr 11;63(1):30-43. doi: 10.5334/pb.1161. eCollection 2023.
5
When Facebook Becomes a Part of the Self: How Do Motives for Using Facebook Influence Privacy Management?当脸书成为自我的一部分:使用脸书的动机如何影响隐私管理?
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 16;12:769075. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769075. eCollection 2021.
6
Personalized persuasion: Quantifying susceptibility to information exploitation in spear-phishing attacks.个性化说服:量化鱼叉式网络钓鱼攻击中信息利用的易感性。
Appl Ergon. 2023 Apr;108:103908. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103908. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
7
Cognitive, personality, and social factors associated with adolescents' online personal information disclosure.与青少年在线个人信息披露相关的认知、个性和社会因素。
J Adolesc. 2013 Aug;36(4):629-38. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.03.016. Epub 2013 May 14.
8
Privacy Concerns and Self-Disclosure in Private and Public Uses of Social Media.社交媒体的私人和公共使用中的隐私问题和自我披露。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2018 Jul;21(7):418-428. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2017.0709.
9
Mastering the challenge of balancing self-disclosure and privacy in social media.掌握社交媒体中自我表露和隐私保护之间的平衡挑战。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Feb;31:67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.003. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
10
The honest truth about deception: Demographic, cognitive, and neural correlates of child repeated deceptive behavior.关于欺骗的真实真相:儿童反复欺骗行为的人口统计学、认知及神经关联
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Oct;162:225-241. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Theoretical conceptualization of online privacy-related decision making - Introducing the tripartite self-disclosure decision model.在线隐私相关决策的理论概念化——引入三方自我披露决策模型。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 19;13:996512. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.996512. eCollection 2022.
2
Social Media-Based Interventions for Health Behavior Change in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Systematic Review.基于社交媒体的健康行为干预在中低收入国家的应用:系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 14;24(4):e31889. doi: 10.2196/31889.
3
Neglecting Long-Term Risks: Self-Disclosure on Social Media and Its Relation to Individual Decision-Making Tendencies and Problematic Social-Networks-Use.

本文引用的文献

1
Privacy Concerns and Self-Disclosure in Private and Public Uses of Social Media.社交媒体的私人和公共使用中的隐私问题和自我披露。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2018 Jul;21(7):418-428. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2017.0709.
2
Social networking in online support groups for health: how online social networking benefits patients.在线支持群组中的社交网络:在线社交网络如何使患者受益。
J Health Commun. 2014;19(6):639-59. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.757396. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
3
Self-presentation 2.0: narcissism and self-esteem on Facebook.自我呈现 2.0:Facebook 上的自恋和自尊。
忽视长期风险:社交媒体上的自我表露及其与个体决策倾向和社交媒体使用问题的关系
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 27;11:543388. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.543388. eCollection 2020.
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2010 Aug;13(4):357-64. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0257.
4
Social influence: compliance and conformity.社会影响:顺从与从众。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:591-621. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015.