• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

互联网上的观点形成:个性、网络结构和内容对在线分享信息的影响。

Opinion Formation on the Internet: The Influence of Personality, Network Structure, and Content on Sharing Messages Online.

作者信息

Burbach Laura, Halbach Patrick, Ziefle Martina, Calero Valdez André

机构信息

Human Computer Interaction Center, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Front Artif Intell. 2020 Jul 2;3:45. doi: 10.3389/frai.2020.00045. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/frai.2020.00045
PMID:33733162
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7861255/
Abstract

Today the majority of people uses online social networks not only to stay in contact with friends, but also to find information about relevant topics, or to spread information. While a lot of research has been conducted into opinion formation, only little is known about which factors influence whether a user of online social networks disseminates information or not. To answer this question, we created an agent-based model and simulated message spreading in social networks using a latent-process model. In our model, we varied four different content types, six different network types, and we varied between a model that includes a personality model for its agents and one that did not. We found that the network type has only a weak influence on the distribution of content, whereas the message type has a clear influence on how many users receive a message. Using a personality model helped achieved more realistic outcomes.

摘要

如今,大多数人使用在线社交网络不仅是为了与朋友保持联系,还为了查找有关相关主题的信息或传播信息。虽然已经对观点形成进行了大量研究,但对于哪些因素影响在线社交网络用户是否传播信息却知之甚少。为了回答这个问题,我们创建了一个基于代理的模型,并使用潜过程模型模拟社交网络中的信息传播。在我们的模型中,我们改变了四种不同的内容类型、六种不同的网络类型,并且在一个为其代理包含个性模型的模型和一个不包含个性模型的模型之间进行了变化。我们发现网络类型对内容的传播只有微弱的影响,而消息类型对有多少用户接收消息有明显的影响。使用个性模型有助于实现更现实的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cd3/7861255/e36536ba7f74/frai-03-00045-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cd3/7861255/6509b48053cb/frai-03-00045-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cd3/7861255/54847ca3546c/frai-03-00045-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cd3/7861255/4fa520d914c9/frai-03-00045-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cd3/7861255/7cc95d90228c/frai-03-00045-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cd3/7861255/e36536ba7f74/frai-03-00045-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cd3/7861255/6509b48053cb/frai-03-00045-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cd3/7861255/54847ca3546c/frai-03-00045-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cd3/7861255/4fa520d914c9/frai-03-00045-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cd3/7861255/7cc95d90228c/frai-03-00045-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cd3/7861255/e36536ba7f74/frai-03-00045-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Opinion Formation on the Internet: The Influence of Personality, Network Structure, and Content on Sharing Messages Online.互联网上的观点形成:个性、网络结构和内容对在线分享信息的影响。
Front Artif Intell. 2020 Jul 2;3:45. doi: 10.3389/frai.2020.00045. eCollection 2020.
2
The persuasion context and results in online opinion seeking: effects of message and source-the moderating role of network managers.网络环境与在线寻求意见的结果:信息与来源的影响——网络管理员的调节作用。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013 Nov;16(11):828-35. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0647. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
3
How did Ebola information spread on twitter: broadcasting or viral spreading?埃博拉信息在推特上是如何传播的:广播还是病毒式传播?
BMC Public Health. 2019 Apr 25;19(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6747-8.
4
Impact of Repeated Exposures on Information Spreading in Social Networks.重复接触对社交网络中信息传播的影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 14;10(10):e0140556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140556. eCollection 2015.
5
Factors influencing message dissemination through social media.社交媒体信息传播的影响因素。
Phys Rev E. 2018 Jun;97(6-1):062306. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.97.062306.
6
Factors Associated With Weight Change in Online Weight Management Communities: A Case Study in the LoseIt Reddit Community.在线体重管理社区中与体重变化相关的因素:以Reddit社区LoseIt为例的案例研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jan 16;19(1):e17. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5816.
7
The use of tags and tag clouds to discern credible content in online health message forums.利用标签和标签云来辨别在线健康信息论坛中的可信内容。
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Jan;81(1):36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
8
Can Seeding in the Clinic Reach a Wide Audience? A Proof of Concept Study on Spreading a Health Message About Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Using a Shareable Online Video.临床中的传播能触及广泛受众吗?一项关于通过可分享在线视频传播青少年特发性关节炎健康信息的概念验证研究。
Interact J Med Res. 2016 Feb 22;5(1):e6. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.4608.
9
Mechanistic modelling of viral spreading on empirical social network and popularity prediction.基于经验社会网络的病毒传播机制建模与流行度预测。
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 3;8(1):13126. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31346-0.
10
Topic selectivity and adaptivity promote spreading of short messages.主题选择性和适应性促进短消息的传播。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 19;12(1):15655. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19719-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying the communication of burnout syndrome on the Twitter platform from the individual, organizational, and environmental perspective.从个人、组织和环境角度识别推特平台上职业倦怠综合征的传播情况。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 19;14:1236491. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1236491. eCollection 2023.
2
Two sides of the same leader: an agent-based model to analyze the effect of ambivalent opinion leaders in social networks.同一领导者的两面:一种基于主体的模型,用于分析社交网络中矛盾意见领袖的影响。
J Comput Soc Sci. 2022;5(2):1159-1205. doi: 10.1007/s42001-022-00161-z. Epub 2022 Apr 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Resilient Consensus for Expressed and Private Opinions.表达意见和隐私意见的弹性共识。
IEEE Trans Cybern. 2021 Jan;51(1):318-331. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2019.2939929. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
2
The spread of low-credibility content by social bots.社交机器人传播低可信度内容。
Nat Commun. 2018 Nov 20;9(1):4787. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06930-7.
3
Opinion modeling on social media and marketing aspects.社交媒体和营销方面的意见建模。
Phys Rev E. 2018 Aug;98(2-1):022315. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.98.022315.
4
Perceived social presence reduces fact-checking.感知社交临场感会降低事实核查。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jun 6;114(23):5976-5981. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1700175114. Epub 2017 May 22.
5
Groupies in multitype random graphs.多类型随机图中的追星族。
Springerplus. 2016 Jul 7;5(1):989. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2705-4. eCollection 2016.
6
Heritability estimates of the Big Five personality traits based on common genetic variants.基于常见基因变异的大五人格特质遗传力估计。
Transl Psychiatry. 2015 Jul 14;5(7):e604. doi: 10.1038/tp.2015.96.
7
Opinion formation on social media: an empirical approach.社交媒体上的观点形成:一种实证方法。
Chaos. 2014 Mar;24(1):013130. doi: 10.1063/1.4866011.
8
Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior.个人特质和属性可从人类行为的数字记录中预测出来。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 9;110(15):5802-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218772110. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
9
Manifestations of personality in Online Social Networks: self-reported Facebook-related behaviors and observable profile information.在线社交网络中的人格表现:自我报告的与 Facebook 相关的行为和可观察的个人资料信息。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2011 Sep;14(9):483-8. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0087. Epub 2011 Jan 23.
10
The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment.在线社交网络实验中的行为传播。
Science. 2010 Sep 3;329(5996):1194-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1185231.