• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

竞争而非观察与合作有助于实现最佳运动规划。

Competition Rather Than Observation and Cooperation Facilitates Optimal Motor Planning.

作者信息

Tanae Mamoru, Ota Keiji, Takiyama Ken

机构信息

Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, United States.

出版信息

Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Feb 26;3:637225. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.637225. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fspor.2021.637225
PMID:33733236
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7959757/
Abstract

Humans tend to select motor planning with a high reward and low success compared with motor planning, which has a small reward and high success rate. Previous studies have shown such a risk-seeking property in motor decision tasks. However, it is unclear how to facilitate a shift from risk-seeking to optimal motor planning that maximizes the expected reward. Here, we investigate the effect of interacting with virtual partners/opponents on motor plans since interpersonal interaction has a powerful influence on human perception, action, and cognition. This study compared three types of interactions (competition, cooperation, and observation) and two types of virtual partners/opponents (those engaged in optimal motor planning and those engaged in risk-averse motor planning). As reported in previous studies, the participants took a risky aim point when they performed a motor decision task alone. However, we found that the participant's aim point was significantly modulated when they performed the same task while competing with a risk-averse opponent ( = 0.018) and that there was no significant difference from the optimal aim point ( = 0.63). No significant modulation in the aim points was observed during the cooperation and observation tasks. These results highlight the importance of competition for modulating suboptimal decision-making and optimizing motor performance.

摘要

与具有小奖励和高成功率的运动规划相比,人类倾向于选择具有高奖励和低成功率的运动规划。先前的研究已经在运动决策任务中显示出这种风险寻求特性。然而,尚不清楚如何促进从风险寻求转向能使预期奖励最大化的最优运动规划。在此,我们研究与虚拟伙伴/对手互动对运动计划的影响,因为人际互动对人类的感知、行动和认知有强大影响。本研究比较了三种互动类型(竞争、合作和观察)以及两种虚拟伙伴/对手类型(那些进行最优运动规划的和那些进行风险规避运动规划的)。如先前研究报道,参与者在独自执行运动决策任务时会采取有风险的目标点。然而,我们发现当参与者与一个风险规避对手竞争时执行相同任务,其目标点会显著受到调节( = 0.018),并且与最优目标点没有显著差异( = 0.63)。在合作和观察任务期间,未观察到目标点有显著调节。这些结果突出了竞争对于调节次优决策和优化运动表现的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ca/7959757/84a648d1757a/fspor-03-637225-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ca/7959757/498bdead86ff/fspor-03-637225-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ca/7959757/304febf86a68/fspor-03-637225-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ca/7959757/a863afef4e79/fspor-03-637225-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ca/7959757/84a648d1757a/fspor-03-637225-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ca/7959757/498bdead86ff/fspor-03-637225-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ca/7959757/304febf86a68/fspor-03-637225-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ca/7959757/a863afef4e79/fspor-03-637225-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ca/7959757/84a648d1757a/fspor-03-637225-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Competition Rather Than Observation and Cooperation Facilitates Optimal Motor Planning.竞争而非观察与合作有助于实现最佳运动规划。
Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Feb 26;3:637225. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.637225. eCollection 2021.
2
Optimizing motor decision-making through competition with opponents.通过与对手竞争来优化运动决策。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 22;10(1):950. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56659-6.
3
Motor planning under temporal uncertainty is suboptimal when the gain function is asymmetric.当增益函数不对称时,在时间不确定性下的运动规划是次优的。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2015 Jul 15;9:88. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2015.00088. eCollection 2015.
4
Sub-optimality in motor planning is not improved by explicit observation of motor uncertainty.运动规划中的次优性不能通过对运动不确定性的显式观察来改善。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 16;9(1):14850. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50901-x.
5
Spillover effects of competition outcome on future risky cooperation.竞争结果对未来风险合作的溢出效应。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 4;13(1):5535. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32523-6.
6
Sub-optimality in motor planning is retained throughout 9 days practice of 2250 trials.在 2250 次试验的 9 天练习过程中,运动规划中的次优性得以保留。
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 21;6:37181. doi: 10.1038/srep37181.
7
Modulation of risk/reward decision making by dopaminergic transmission within the basolateral amygdala.基底外侧杏仁核内多巴胺能传递对风险/回报决策的调节作用。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 Jan;233(1):121-36. doi: 10.1007/s00213-015-4094-8. Epub 2015 Oct 3.
8
Effects of salience and reward information during saccadic decisions under risk.风险条件下扫视决策过程中显著性和奖励信息的影响。
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2009 Nov;26(11):B1-13. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.26.0000B1.
9
Human decision making anticipates future performance in motor learning.人类决策可预测运动学习中的未来表现。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Feb 28;16(2):e1007632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007632. eCollection 2020 Feb.
10
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Modulates Risk-Attitude in Motor Decision-Making.经颅直流电刺激背外侧前额叶皮层可调节运动决策中的风险态度。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Sep 6;13:297. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00297. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimizing motor decision-making through competition with opponents.通过与对手竞争来优化运动决策。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 22;10(1):950. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56659-6.
2
Sub-optimality in motor planning is not improved by explicit observation of motor uncertainty.运动规划中的次优性不能通过对运动不确定性的显式观察来改善。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 16;9(1):14850. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50901-x.
3
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Modulates Risk-Attitude in Motor Decision-Making.经颅直流电刺激背外侧前额叶皮层可调节运动决策中的风险态度。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Sep 6;13:297. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00297. eCollection 2019.
4
Risk aversion in the adjustment of speed-accuracy tradeoff depending on time constraints.根据时间限制调整速度-准确性权衡时的风险规避。
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 13;9(1):11732. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48052-0.
5
Predicting actions from subtle preparatory movements.从细微的预备动作中预测动作。
Cognition. 2017 Nov;168:65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.014. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
6
Sub-optimality in motor planning is retained throughout 9 days practice of 2250 trials.在 2250 次试验的 9 天练习过程中,运动规划中的次优性得以保留。
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 21;6:37181. doi: 10.1038/srep37181.
7
Functional Plasticity in Somatosensory Cortex Supports Motor Learning by Observing.体感皮层的功能可塑性通过观察来支持运动学习。
Curr Biol. 2016 Apr 4;26(7):921-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.01.064. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
8
Motor planning under temporal uncertainty is suboptimal when the gain function is asymmetric.当增益函数不对称时,在时间不确定性下的运动规划是次优的。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2015 Jul 15;9:88. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2015.00088. eCollection 2015.
9
Prospective errors determine motor learning.前瞻性错误决定运动学习。
Nat Commun. 2015 Jan 30;6:5925. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6925.
10
What would be Usain Bolt's 100-meter sprint world record without Tyson Gay? Unintentional interpersonal synchronization between the two sprinters.如果没有泰森·盖伊(Tyson Gay),博尔特(Usain Bolt)的 100 米短跑世界纪录将会是怎样的?这两位短跑选手之间存在非蓄意的人际同步。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Feb;41(1):36-41. doi: 10.1037/a0038640. Epub 2015 Jan 5.